Comparative study of different laser systems

In: Fertility and Sterility · 1994 · vol. 61(4) , pp. 581–591 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56629-1 · PMID:8150095 · W200604186
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-10

This paper compares the efficacy and safety of various laser systems for a specific dermatological condition, reporting findings on their comparative outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo review lasers, laser physics, laser-tissue interaction, delivery systems, and their clinical applications relevant to gynecology.SettingsGynecological Service at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and MGH Laser Center.InterventionsNone.DesignLaser literature review and personal experiences of the authors were used to prepare this manuscript.ConclusionsLasers have been used in gynecologic practice for cutting and coagulating purposes. Photodynamic therapy has been used clinically for malignant conditions and is being investigated for dysplastic lesions of the lower genital tract and for endometrial ablation. Laser welding has potential, but further work is required in this field before it finds a clinical application. The main lasers used in gynecology are CO2, neodymium-yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG), and potassium tatanyl-phosphate-doubled Nd:YAG. Pulsed Ho:YAG laser looks promising, as does diode lasers. Holmium-yttrium aluminum garnet and diode lasers will be soon available commercially. Improvements in delivery systems have increased user friendliness, and more developments in this area are anticipated, for example, a fiber-optic delivery system for CO2 lasers. We believe that enhanced understanding of laser technology will provide unique applications for development in gynecology.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (56)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-01T06:38:12.426807+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK