Erratum: Is intracrinology of endometriosis relevant in clinical practice? A systematic review on estrogen metabolism

An omission to the funding section of the original article was made in error. The following sentence has been added: “Open access funding was provided by the University of Geneva”. The original version of this article has been updated. Summary Keywords endometriosis, estrogen, metabolism, pelvic pain, endometrium Citation Frontiers Production Office (2023) Erratum: Is intracrinology of endometriosis relevant in clinical practice? A systematic review on estrogen metabolism. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1177346. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1177346 Received 01 March 2023 Accepted 01 March 2023 Published 10 March 2023 Approved by Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland Volume 14 - 2023 Updates Copyright © 2023 Frontiers Production Office. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. *Correspondence: Frontiers Production Office, [email protected] This article was submitted to Reproduction, a section of the journal Frontiers in Endocrinology Disclaimer All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.