Endometriosis: assessment on O-RADS and risk of malignant transformation

review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-06

This review explores the imaging features of endometriomas and malignant transformation, surveillance strategies, and research gaps to better understand endometriosis malignancy risk and guide future surveillance.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06 · read from full text

This review describes how endometriosis-related ovarian lesions (especially endometriomas) are imaged and how their appearance and the presence of features suggestive of malignant transformation can be risk-stratified using systems such as O-RADS, alongside other staging/extent tools (rASRM, #ENZIAN, dPEI). It outlines current surveillance recommendations, noting that O-RADS guidelines call for follow-up of endometriomas for up to 2 years with further follow-up determined by clinical factors, and it highlights that there are no malignancy-focused consensus imaging surveillance guidelines for deep endometriosis. The key caveat is the stated gap in literature and the lack of standardized, malignancy-directed imaging surveillance strategies for deep disease. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it reviews imaging assessment of endometriomas using O-RADS and discusses risk and surveillance gaps for malignant transformation in endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 19,056 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Endometriosis is a common disease, affecting approximately 10% of women of reproductive age. Several intersecting guidelines and consensus statements provide information on imaging diagnosis and surveillance strategies for endometriomas. SRU consensus panel recommendations provide information on initial detection of endometriosis on routine pelvic imaging. Revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) classification, the #ENZIAN classification, and the deep pelvic endometriosis index (dPEI) aim to assess the overall extent of disease and assist in presurgical planning. The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) aims to risk stratify lesions evaluated with US or MR based on their imaging morphology, from typical benign lesions to atypical presentations and malignant transformation. Emerging data shows increased risk of ovarian cancer in patients with endometriosis, especially following menopause and in those patients with long standing endometriosis. (Chen et al. in Front Oncol. 14:1329133, 2024;Streuli et al. in Climacteric. 20:138–143, 2017;Secosan et al. in Diagnostics (Basel). 10:134, 2020;Inceboz in Womens Health (Lond Engl). 11:711–715, 2015;Cassani et al. in Maturitas. 190, 2024;Gemmell et al. in Hum Reprod Update. 23:481–500, 2017;Giannella et al. in Cancers (Basel). 13:4026, 2021;) Current O-RADS guidelines mandate follow-up of endometriomas up to 2 years with further follow-up based on clinical factors. No consensus guidelines exist for imaging surveillance of patients with deep endometriosis from a malignancy standpoint. This review explores the imaging appearance of endometriomas, imaging features of malignant transformation, surveillance strategies and gaps in current literature, and attempts to better understand the risk of malignancy and to encourage further research for long-term imaging surveillance of endometriosis patients. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

Chen B, Zhao L, Yang R, Xu T. New insights about endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: pathogenesis, risk factors, prediction and diagnosis and treatment. Front Oncol. 2024;14: 1329133. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1329133 Streuli I, Gaitzsch H, Wenger J-M, Petignat P. Endometriosis after menopause: physiopathology and management of an uncommon condition. Climacteric. 2017;20: 138–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2017.1284781 Secosan C, Balulescu L, Brasoveanu S, Balint O, Pirtea P, Dorin G, et al. Endometriosis in menopause-renewed attention on a controversial disease. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10: 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10030134 Inceboz U. Endometriosis after menopause. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2015;11: 711–715. https://doi.org/10.2217/whe.15.59 Cassani C, Tedeschi S, Cucinella L, Morteo V, Camnasio CA, Tiranini L, et al. Menopause and endometriosis. Maturitas. 2024;190: 108129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108129 Gemmell LC, Webster KE, Kirtley S, Vincent K, Zondervan KT, Becker CM. The management of menopause in women with a history of endometriosis: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23: 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmx011 Giannella L, Marconi C, Di Giuseppe J, Delli Carpini G, Fichera M, Grelloni C, et al. Malignant transformation of postmenopausal endometriosis: A systematic review of the literature. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13: 4026. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13164026 Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382: 1244–1256. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1810764 Young SW, Jha P, Chamié L, Rodgers S, Kho RM, Horrow MM, et al. Society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus on routine pelvic US for endometriosis. Radiology. 2024;311. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.232191 Mowers EL, Lim CS, Skinner B, Mahnert N, Kamdar N, Morgan DM, et al. Prevalence of endometriosis during abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy for chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127: 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000001422 Sadłocha M, Toczek J, Major K, Staniczek J, Stojko R. Endometriosis: Molecular pathophysiology and recent treatment strategies—comprehensive literature review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024;17: 827. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070827 Tomassetti C, Johnson NP, Petrozza J, Abrao MS, Einarsson JI, Horne AW, et al. An international terminology for endometriosis, 2021. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28: 1849–1859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.032 Thomassin-Naggara I, Lamrabet S, Crestani A, Bekhouche A, Wahab CA, Kermarrec E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging classification of deep pelvic endometriosis: description and impact on surgical management. Hum Reprod. 2020;35: 1589–1600. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa103 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril. 1997;67: 817–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81391-x Keckstein J, Saridogan E, Ulrich UA, Sillem M, Oppelt P, Schweppe KW, et al. The #Enzian classification: A comprehensive non‐invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100: 1165–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14099 Barnard ME, Farland LV, Yan B, Wang J, Trabert B, Doherty JA, et al. Endometriosis typology and ovarian cancer risk. JAMA. 2024;332: 482–489. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.9210 Melin A, Sparén P, Bergqvist A. The risk of cancer and the role of parity among women with endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008;63: 156–157. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000305201.52162.49 Sadowski EA, Thomassin-Naggara I, Rockall A, Maturen KE, Forstner R, Jha P, et al. O-RADS MRI Risk Stratification System: Guide for Assessing Adnexal Lesions from the ACR O-RADS Committee. Radiology. 2022;303: 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.204371 Strachowski LM, Jha P, Phillips CH, Blanchette Porter MM, Froyman W, Glanc P, et al. O-RADS US v2022: An update from the American college of radiology’s ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system US committee. Radiology. 2023;308. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230685 Thomassin-Naggara I, Poncelet E, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Guerra A, Fournier LS, Stojanovic S, et al. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) Score for Risk Stratification of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3: e1919896. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19896 Jha P, Gupta A, Baran TM, Maturen KE, Patel-Lippmann K, Zafar HM, et al. Diagnostic performance of the ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound risk score in women in the United States. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5: e2216370. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16370 Patel-Lippmann KK, Gupta A, Martin MF, Phillips CH, Maturen KE, Jha P, et al. The roles of ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system US and ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system MRI in the evaluation of adnexal lesions. Radiology. 2024;312. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233332 Timmerman S, Valentin L, Ceusters J, Testa AC, Landolfo C, Sladkevicius P, et al. External validation of the ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) lexicon and the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis 2-step strategy to stratify ovarian tumors into O-RADS risk groups. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9: 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5969 Froyman W, Landolfo C, De Cock B, Wynants L, Sladkevicius P, Testa AC, et al. Risk of complications in patients with conservatively managed ovarian tumours (IOTA5): a 2-year interim analysis of a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20: 448–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30837-4 Levine D, Brown DL, Andreotti RF, Benacerraf B, Benson CB, Brewster WR, et al. Management of asymptomatic ovarian and other adnexal cysts imaged at US Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement. Ultrasound Q. 2010;26: 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3181f09099 Froyman W, Wynants L, Landolfo C, Bourne T, Valentin L, Testa A, et al. Validation of the performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) methods in the diagnosis of early stage ovarian cancer in a non-screening population. Diagnostics (Basel). 2017;7: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics7020032 Practice bulletin no. 174 summary: Evaluation and management of adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128: 1193–1195. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000001763 Smith-Bindman R, Poder L, Johnson E, Miglioretti DL. Risk of malignant ovarian cancer based on ultrasonography findings in a large unselected population. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179: 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5113 Andreotti RF, Timmerman D, Strachowski LM, Froyman W, Benacerraf BR, Bennett GL, et al. O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee. Radiology. 2020;294: 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019191150 Testa AC, Timmerman D, Van Holsbeke C, Zannoni GF, Fransis S, Moerman P, et al. Ovarian cancer arising in endometrioid cysts: ultrasound findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38: 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8970 Brown DL, Doubilet PM, Miller FH, Frates MC, Laing FC, DiSalvo DN, et al. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features. Radiology. 1998;208: 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.208.1.9646799 Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ameye L, Jurkovic D, Van Holsbeke C, et al. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31: 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5365 Robinson KA, Menias CO, Chen L, Schiappacasse G, Shaaban AM, Caserta MP, et al. Understanding malignant transformation of endometriosis: imaging features with pathologic correlation. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45: 1762–1775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01914-7 Matalliotakis M, Matalliotaki C, Trivli A, Zervou MI, Kalogiannidis I, Tzardi M, et al. Keeping an eye on perimenopausal and postmenopausal endometriosis. Diseases. 2019;7: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases7010029 Huang K-J, Li Y-X, Wu C-J, Chang W-C, Wei L-H, Sheu B-C. Sonographic features differentiating early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma from endometrioma with atypical features. J Ovarian Res. 2022;15: 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-022-01019-8 La Vecchia C. Ovarian cancer: epidemiology and risk factors. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2017;26: 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000217 Reinhold C, Rockall A, Sadowski EA, Siegelman ES, Maturen KE, Vargas HA, et al. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Lexicon for MRI: A White Paper of the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data Systems MRI Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021;18: 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.12.022 Corwin MT, Gerscovich EO, Lamba R, Wilson M, McGahan JP. Differentiation of ovarian endometriomas from hemorrhagic cysts at MR imaging: utility of the T2 dark spot sign. Radiology. 2014;271: 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13131394 Togashi K, Nishimura K, Kimura I, Tsuda Y, Yamashita K, Shibata T, et al. Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1991;180: 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.180.1.2052726 Kim HS, Kim TH, Chung HH, Song YS. Risk and prognosis of ovarian cancer in women with endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2014;110: 1878–1890. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.29 Wang C, Liang Z, Liu X, Zhang Q, Li S. The association between endometriosis, tubal ligation, hysterectomy and epithelial ovarian cancer: Meta-analyses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111138 Vigano E, Parazzini ’. P., Stoppelli F, Giambattista S, Vercellini E. Association between endometriosis and cancer: a comprehensive review and a critical analysis of clinical and epidemiological evidence. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101: 331–341. Kobayashi H, Sumimoto K, Moniwa N, Imai M, Takakura K, Kuromaki T, et al. Risk of developing ovarian cancer among women with ovarian endometrioma: a cohort study in Shizuoka, Japan. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17: 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00754.x Mostoufizadeh M, Scully RE. Malignant tumors arising in endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1980;23: 951–963. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003081-198023030-00024 Stern RC, Dash R, Bentley RC, Snyder MJ, Haney AR, Robboy SJ. Malignancy in endometriosis: Frequency and comparison of ovarian and extraovarian types. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001;56: 415–416. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-200107000-00015 Grandi G, Toss A, Cortesi L, Botticelli L, Volpe A, Cagnacci A. The association between endometriomas and ovarian cancer: Preventive effect of inhibiting ovulation and menstruation during reproductive life. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015: 751571. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/751571 Guo S-W. Cancer-associated mutations in endometriosis: shedding light on the pathogenesis and pathophysiology. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26: 423–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmz047 Krawczyk N, Banys-Paluchowski M, Schmidt D, Ulrich U, Fehm T. Endometriosis-associated malignancy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016;76: 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1558239 Kobayashi H, Kajiwara H, Kanayama S, Yamada Y, Furukawa N, Noguchi T, et al. Molecular pathogenesis of endometriosis-associated clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (review). Oncol Rep. 2009;22: 233–240. https://doi.org/10.3892/or_00000429 Yamaguchi K, Mandai M, Toyokuni S, Hamanishi J, Higuchi T, Takakura K. Contents endometriotic cysts, especially high concentration free iron, possible cause carcinogenesis cysts through iron-induced persistent oxidative stress. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14: 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR07-1614 Munksgaard PS, Blaakaer J. The association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer: a review of histological, genetic and molecular alterations. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124: 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.10.001 DePriest PD, Banks ER, Powell DE, van Nagell JR Jr, Gallion HH, Puls LE, et al. Endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary and endometriosis: the association in postmenopausal women. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;47: 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(92)90079-x McDermott S, Oei TN, Iyer VR, Lee SI. MR imaging of malignancies arising in endometriomas and extraovarian endometriosis. Radiographics. 2012;32: 845–863. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.323115736 Zhang X, Li M, Tang Z, Li X, Song T. Differentiation between endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers and non- endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers based on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol. 2021;94: 20201441. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20201441 Kumar S, Munkarah A, Arabi H, Bandyopadhyay S, Semaan A, Hayek K, et al. Prognostic analysis of ovarian cancer associated with endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204: 63.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.017 Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Uehara H, Nishitani H. Malignant transformation of pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging findings and pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2006;26: 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.262055041 Tanaka YO, Okada S, Yagi T, Satoh T, Oki A, Tsunoda H, et al. MRI of endometriotic cysts in association with ovarian carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194: 355–361. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2985 Dhanda S, Thakur M, Kerkar R, Jagmohan P. Diffusion weighted imaging gynecologic tumors: diagnostic pearls potential pitfalls. Radiographics. 2014;34: 1393–1416. Cheung E, Gillks CB. Tumors ovary. : WHO classification female genital Tumors. Lyon, France; 2020. pp. 31–167. Hauptmann S, Friedrich K, Redline R, Avril S. Ovarian borderline tumors in the 2014 WHO classification: evolving concepts and diagnostic criteria. Virchows Arch. 2017;470: 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-2040-8 Tsuboyama T, Sato K, Ota T, Fukui H, Onishi H, Nakamoto A, et al. MRI of borderline epithelial ovarian tumors: Pathologic correlation and diagnostic challenges. Radiographics. 2022;42: 2095–2111. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.220068 Han JW, Kim KA, Chang HY, Kim JW, Park YS, Lee J, et al. Newly categorized seromucinous tumor of the ovary: Magnetic resonance imaging findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019;43: 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000776 Zhao SH, Qiang JW, Zhang GF, Ma FH, Cai SQ, Li HM, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating borderline from malignant epithelial tumours of the ovary: pathological correlation. Eur Radiol. 2014;24: 2292–2299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3236-4 Jia S-Z, Zhang J-J, Yang J-J, Xiang Y, Liang Z, Leng J-H. Risk of synchronous endometrial disorders in women with endometrioid borderline tumors of the ovary. J Ovarian Res. 2018;11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0405-0 Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Harada M. Ovarian adenofibromas and cystadenofibromas: magnetic resonance imaging findings including diffusion-weighted imaging. Acta Radiol. 2013;54: 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2012.120516 Thomassin-Naggara I, Aubert E, Rockall A, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Rouzier R, Daraï E, et al. Adnexal masses: development and preliminary validation of an MR imaging scoring system. Radiology. 2013;267: 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13121161 Chamié LP, VanBuren WM, Xiao L, Pires Franco IV, Feldman MK, Causa Andrieu P, et al. Postmenopausal endometriosis: Clinical insights and imaging considerations. Radiographics. 2024;44: e240046. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.240046 Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions Each author contributed one section of the manuscript. Authors Patel-Lippmann, Phillips, Jha, Burk, and Suarez-Weiss contributed to the figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript. Corresponding authors Ethics declarations Competing interests Priyanka Jha: O-RADS Steering Committee Member and Honorarium from World Class CME Angela Tong: Speaker honorarium from Siemens Healthineers × 1; Research support from Siemens Healthineer in the form of software and hardware. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Suarez-Weiss, K.E., Patel-Lippmann, K., Phillips, C. et al. Endometriosis: assessment on O-RADS and risk of malignant transformation. Abdom Radiol 50, 4865–4877 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04885-0 Received: Revised: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04885-0

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

rASRM Enzian

Condition tags

mesh:D004715endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (71)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-24T00:31:45.591946+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK