Abstract
Endometriosis involves the growth of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity, with its
manifestation in the rectus abdominis muscle being exceptionally rare and primarily observed in women
with a history of abdominal surgeries. In this report, we present the case of a 42-year-old female with a
medical history of two cesarean sections who presented with cyclical abdominal pain and a palpable mass in
the right lower quadrant. An MRI scan of the pelvis revealed a lesion on the right lower quadrant of the
abdominal wall, proximate to the previous Pfannenstiel incision. A percutaneous US-guided biopsy of the
abdominal lesion was performed, and histopathology demonstrated the presence of endometrial glands and
stroma, confirming the diagnosis of rectus abdominis endometriosis. She was submitted to a local wide
excision with adequate margins of normal surrounding tissue and has remained free of recurrence for two
years.
Categories:
Pathology, Obstetrics/Gynecology
Keywords
cesarean section, surgical margins, surgical excision, caesarian section, rectus abdominis muscle,
endometriosis
Introduction
Endometriosis, characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, is a complex
gynecological condition affecting approximately 5%-10% of women globally
[1,2]
. Ectopic endometrial
tissue, while most commonly found within the pelvic cavity (on the ovaries, fallopian tubes, and peritoneum)
can, in rarer instances, be present in extrapelvic locations such as the abdominal wall, lung, or even the
brain.
[1,3]
. Notably, the prevalence of abdominal wall endometriosis is reported to be between 0.03% and
1% among women who have undergone cesarean sections or other types of abdominal surgery
[4]
. Despite its
rarity, the impact of abdominal wall endometriosis on patients can be profound, often resulting in
significant pain and discomfort, which may be cyclical in nature, coinciding with the menstrual cycle. The
diagnosis of rectus abdominis endometriosis poses significant challenges, as its symptoms can overlap with
those of other abdominal pathologies, necessitating a thorough differential diagnosis process and often
requiring a multidisciplinary approach. This report presents the case of a 42-year-old woman presenting
with cyclical abdominal pain and a palpable abdominal wall mass who was diagnosed with rectus abdominis
endometriosis. The case aims to highlight the distinct clinicopathological characteristics and to increase
clinical awareness and diagnostic suspicion of endometriosis in this uncommon location, particularly in
women with a history of abdominal surgeries.
Case Presentation
A 42-year-old woman was referred to our department due to a history of abdominal pain that intensified
during menstruation over the past four years. Her medical history included two cesarean sections, performed
12 and 10 years ago, and the surgical excision of an in situ melanoma in the genital region seven years ago.
She had no reported history of pelvic endometriosis. A physical examination of the abdomen revealed a
firm, painless, palpable mass in the lower right quadrant. Laboratory values, including tumor marker cancer
antigen 125 (CA-125), were within normal limits (17.4, normal range: 0-35 U/mL).
A transvaginal ultrasound showed no abnormal findings. However, an abdominal ultrasound identified a
focal hypoechoic lesion within the rectus abdominis muscle. Further evaluation by MRI scan of the pelvis
revealed a lesion measuring 20 mm in its largest dimension, located on the right lateral aspect of the lower-
anterior abdominal wall, in proximity to the Pfannenstiel incision. On T1-weighted fat-saturated images,
the lesion exhibited avid contrast enhancement, whereas on T2-weighted images, its signal was slightly
hyperintense compared to the left rectus abdominis muscle (Figure
1
). Notably, the posterior edge of the
lesion was closely adjacent to loops of the small intestine without intruding upon them.
1
2
3
4
5
6
2
2
Open Access Case
Report
DOI:
10.7759/cureus.55462
How to cite this article
Kalfoutzou A, Restemi A, Mylonakis A, et al. (March 03, 2024) Rectus Abdominis Endometriosis Following Cesarean Section: A Case Report.
Cureus 16(3): e55462.
DOI 10.7759/cureus.55462
FIGURE
1: An MRI scan of the abdomen with intravenous contrast
Panel A: T1 post-contrast fat-saturated weighted image depicts a lesion with avid enhancement in the right rectus
abdominis muscle (white arrow). Panel B: A T2-weighted image reveals a lesion with higher signal intensity in the
right rectus abdominis muscle compared to the left (white arrow).
A percutaneous US-guided biopsy of the palpable lesion was performed. Histopathological examination
revealed the presence of endometrial-type glands and stroma embedded within the muscular tissue (Figure
2
). Additionally, foci of hemosiderin-laden foci, fibrosis, and atrophy were observed in the adjacent muscular
tissue. Immunohistochemical staining showed that the glandular cells were positive for cytokeratin 7 (CK7)
and paired-box gene 8 (PAX8), while the stromal cells exhibited positive staining for CD10 (Figure
3
).
Collectively, these findings were suggestive of ectopic endometrial tissue strictly confined within the rectus
abdominis muscle without extension to adjacent tissues.
FIGURE
2: Panel A: Histopathological examination (hematoxylin-eosin
stain, 20x magnification) exhibits endometrial glands (white arrow) and
stroma (black arrow) embedded within muscle fibers (visible on the left
side of the image). Panel B: In the immunohistochemical analysis (20x
magnification), positive PAX8 staining is observed in both the glandular
component and the surrounding stroma.
PAX8: paired-box gene 8
2024 Kalfoutzou et al. Cureus 16(3): e55462. DOI 10.7759/cureus.55462
2
of
6
FIGURE
3: Immunohistochemical staining, 20x magnification
Panel A: The glandular component exhibits positive staining for CK7. Panel B: The stromal component shows
positive staining for CD10.
CK7: cytokeratin 7
Subsequently, the patient underwent local excision of the lesion en bloc with part of the surrounding rectus
abdominis muscle without entering the peritoneal cavity. Macroscopic examination of the surgical specimen
revealed a whitish lesion measuring 25 mm in size. The lesion was removed with a minimum margin of 12
mm of surrounding normal tissue on all sides. The lesion demonstrated characteristic features of
endometriosis, including endometrial glands and stroma, accompanied by both recent and old hemorrhagic
activity. Hemosiderin-laden macrophages, as well as focal atrophy, were observed in the surrounding muscle
tissue. Immunohistochemical analysis showed positive staining for CK7 in the glandular cells and positive
staining for CD10 in the stromal cells. Both glandular and stromal cells expressed PAX8, estrogen, and
progesterone receptors, confirming the diagnosis of rectus abdominis endometriosis.
The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged the following day. She has been
under consistent gynecological follow-up for two years since the surgery, including monitoring with CA-125
measurements, abdominal MRI scans, and gynecological ultrasounds, with no evidence of disease
recurrence. The patient is scheduled for biannual follow-up visits for a total of five years.
Discussion
Endometriosis is defined by the presence of functional ectopic endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity
[5,6]
. This condition primarily affects women of childbearing age, with a peak incidence around the age of
35, and is a major cause of infertility among women in this age group
[5]
. Endometriosis can manifest within
the pelvic cavity, affecting the ovaries, fallopian tubes, Douglas pouch, cervix, vagina, bladder, rectum, and
peritoneal surface, or extend to extrapelvic organs such as the skin, kidneys, lungs, extremities, liver,
stomach, or brain
[2,4,6-8]
. An exceedingly rare form is rectus abdominis endometriosis, where the
endometrial tissue lies within the rectus abdominis muscle
[3,4]
. This particular type of endometriosis
predominantly affects women who have undergone prior abdominal surgical procedures, such as cesarean
sections, with the onset usually ranging from three months to 10 years after the surgery
[4,8,9]
. The
prevalence of rectus abdominis endometriosis, especially following a cesarean section, is reported to range
from 0.03% to 0.45%
[8]
. Approximately 25% of these cases have a history of pelvic endometriosis
[6,10,11]
.
Our patient presented symptoms six years after a cesarean section, and there was no history of pelvic
endometriosis.
Various theories have been suggested to explain the etiology of endometriosis. The transplantation theory,
widely recognized, hypothesizes that endometriosis develops from the retrograde transport of viable
endometrial tissue during menstruation
[6,7,9,12,13]
. The coelomic metaplasia theory proposes that
endometriosis stems from the transformation of peritoneal cells
[6,9,12,13]
. The induction theory,
alternatively, suggests that the spread of shed endometrial tissue leads to endometriosis
[7,10,12]
. Moreover,
the embryonic rest theory proposes that endometriosis is triggered by the activation of Müllerian origin cells
[10]
. Notably, abdominal wall endometriosis has been linked to iatrogenic dissemination following surgical
procedures in the abdomen
[7]
. Furthermore, the potential for lymphatic and vascular spread has been
considered in the pathogenesis of extrapelvic endometriosis
[7,10,12-14]
.
The clinical presentation of rectus abdominis endometriosis varies widely, ranging from asymptomatic to
severe, incapacitating acute abdominal pain
[11,15]
. The most common symptoms include abdominal pain
that intensifies during menstruation, dysmenorrhea, irregular menses, dyspareunia, or infertility
[2,8]
. Non-
cyclical abdominal pain can also be a symptom of this condition in one-third of patients
[14]
. A palpable
nodule may be detected during a clinical examination, typically located adjacent to a surgical scar
[16]
. In
2024 Kalfoutzou et al. Cureus 16(3): e55462. DOI 10.7759/cureus.55462
3
of
6
rare instances, a diagnosis is made incidentally during a surgical procedure performed for a different
medical issue
[17]
.
Laboratory tests typically do not yield diagnostic results, although CA-125 levels are frequently found to be
mildly elevated
[2,3]
. Ongoing studies are evaluating the potential of markers like C-reactive protein (CRP),
anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), follistatin, CA 19-9, CA 15-3, and vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF), among others, as indicators for the detection of endometriosis; yet, to date, none have shown
considerable specificity
[3,11]
. In our case, all laboratory tests, including CA-125, were within normal ranges.
Imaging modalities, including ultrasonography, CT scans, and MRI scans, can aid in distinguishing rectus
abdominis endometriosis from adjacent tissues
[15]
. Common ultrasonographic findings include well-
defined, hypoechoic masses that may be solid, cystic, or have mixed components and frequently exhibit high
vascularity on Doppler imaging
[2,6,9,16]
. On a CT scan, the lesions generally appear isointense to muscle
tissue and exhibit heterogeneous, significant contrast enhancement
[16]
. An MRI scan of the abdomen and
pelvis is the preferred imaging modality, often showing cystic structures that display high signal intensity on
T1-weighted images and variable intensities on T2-weighted images, depending on the amount of glandular
tissue and the age of hemorrhagic products (9,15,16). However, it is important to note that there are no
imaging findings pathognomonic for diagnosing rectus abdominis endometriosis
[1,2,6,16]
.
Differential diagnosis includes a variety of benign and malignant lesions of the abdominal wall, such as
suture granuloma, lymphadenopathy, abscess, inguinal or incisional hernia, lipoma, hematoma,
subcutaneous and sebaceous cysts, primary or metastatic cancer, lymphoma, sarcoma, and desmoid tumor
[2,10-12,17-19]
.
A definitive diagnosis is established through histopathological analysis of tissue samples, typically acquired
via a US-guided biopsy
[6,16,18]
. In certain instances, the diagnosis is established postoperatively following
an excisional biopsy
[18]
. Histopathological examination typically shows the presence of endometrial glands
and stroma embedded in the skeletal muscle fibers of the rectus abdominis muscle
[10,14]
. The glands are
encased by columnar epithelial cells, while the stroma consists of small, spindle-shaped cells with minimal
cytoplasm
[9]
. Occasional foci of hemosiderin-laden macrophages can also be observed within the striated
muscle
[20]
. Immunohistochemistry typically indicates positive staining for estrogen and progesterone
receptors in both stromal and glandular cells, as well as positive staining for PAX8 and CK7 in glandular
cells and positive CD10 staining in endometrial stroma
[6,21]
.
The primary treatment for this condition is wide local excision, which necessitates the removal of at least 10
mm of normal tissue surrounding the lesion to reduce the risk of recurrence
[2,7,9,17]
. In rare instances,
asymptomatic cases may be monitored without immediate intervention
[15]
. Historically, pharmacological
treatments such as oral contraceptives, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs, progesterone, or
danazol have been used with limited effectiveness as primary treatments
[3,7,9,16]
. However, these agents
may serve as an alternative for patients who cannot undergo surgery or as adjuvant therapy to mitigate the
risk of recurrence
[7,9,16]
. There has been a report of successful treatment of rectus abdominis
endometriosis using sclerotherapy with ultrasound-guided ethanol injection
[18]
. Additionally, high-
intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation has been experimented with and has shown promising results
[22]
. In our case, surgical intervention was decided due to the patient’s escalating abdominal pain, which led
to the complete resolution of symptoms.
The prognosis is typically favorable, with a recurrence rate of up to 4.3%
[9,11]
. Instances of malignant
transformation have been documented, occurring in roughly 0.3% to 1% of cases
[9,11]
. Regular
gynecological follow-up is crucial to detect any potential recurrence of endometriosis in the local area. This
involves clinical assessment, CA-125 measurements, as well as consistent gynecological ultrasounds and
abdominal imaging
[10,11]
.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the 25th case of endometriosis strictly confined within the rectus
abdominis muscle reported in the literature since 1984
[3,6,7,23-26]
. The patient's history of cesarean
sections, the cyclical nature of her pain in sync with menstrual cycles, and the detection of a palpable nodule
during clinical examination are hallmark features of rectus abdominis endometriosis. This case underscores
the importance of considering rectus abdominis endometriosis in differential diagnosis, particularly in
patients with similar clinical profiles, to ensure timely and appropriate management.
Conclusions
The diagnosis of rectus abdominis endometriosis requires a high index of suspicion, especially in women
with a history of abdominal surgeries presenting with cyclical abdominal pain. Surgical excision, ensuring
wide margins of normal tissue, emerges as the cornerstone of treatment, offering the most definitive means
of symptom relief and minimizing the risk of recurrence. Ongoing and thorough follow-up of patients is
imperative in ensuring early recurrence detection and in maintaining and potentially enhancing the
patient's overall quality of life.
2024 Kalfoutzou et al. Cureus 16(3): e55462. DOI 10.7759/cureus.55462
4
of
6
Additional Information
Author Contributions
All authors have reviewed the final version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the
work.
Concept and design:
Adam Mylonakis, Areti Kalfoutzou, Nikolaos Chaleplidis
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:
Adam Mylonakis, Areti Kalfoutzou, Asimina Restemi,
Dimitrios Matsaridis, Andria Peraki, Konstantinos Papadimitropoulos, Margaritis Tsantopoulos
Drafting of the manuscript:
Adam Mylonakis, Areti Kalfoutzou, Asimina Restemi, Andria Peraki,
Konstantinos Papadimitropoulos, Nikolaos Chaleplidis
Supervision:
Adam Mylonakis, Areti Kalfoutzou, Dimitrios Matsaridis, Nikolaos Chaleplidis, Margaritis
Tsantopoulos
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:
Areti Kalfoutzou, Dimitrios
Matsaridis, Nikolaos Chaleplidis, Margaritis Tsantopoulos
Disclosures
Human subjects:
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Review
Board, 251 Air Force General Hospital issued approval 155/20-11-2023.
Conflicts of interest:
In compliance
with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info:
All
authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships:
All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or
within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships:
All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could
appear to have influenced the submitted work.
References
1
.
Calò PG, Ambu R, Medas F, Longheu A, Pisano G, Nicolosi A:
Rectus abdominis muscle endometriosis report
of two cases and review of the literature
. Ann Ital Chir. 2012,
2
.
Cozzolino M, Magnolfi S, Corioni S, Moncini D, Mattei A:
Abdominal wall endometriosis on the right port
site after laparoscopy: case report and literature review
. Ochsner J. 2015, 15:251-5.
3
.
Giannella L, La Marca A, Ternelli G, Menozzi G:
Rectus abdominis muscle endometriosis: case report and
review of the literature
. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010, 36:902-6.
10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01236.x
4
.
Sucandy I, Indeck MC:
Abdominal wall endometriosis: a gynecologic condition commonly presented to
general surgeons
. Am Surg. 2013, 79:E69-70.
5
.
Vitral GS, Salgado HC, Rangel JM:
Use of radioguided surgery in abdominal wall endometriosis: an
innovative approach
. World J Nucl Med. 2018, 17:204-6.
10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_47_17
6
.
Karaman H, Bulut F, Özaşlamacı A:
Endometriosis externa within the rectus abdominis muscle
. Ulus Cerrahi
Derg. 2014, 30:165-8.
10.5152/UCD.2014.2035
7
.
Evruke IM, Babaturk A, Akbas G:
A rare occurrence of endometriosis externa individually within the rectus
abdominis muscle
. Cureus. 2023, 15:e33662.
10.7759/cureus.33662
8
.
Dordević M, Jovanović B, Mitrović S, Dordević G, Radovanović D, Sazdanović P:
Rectus abdominis muscle
endometriosis after cesarean section--case report
. Acta Clin Croat. 2009, 48:439-43.
9
.
Wasserman P, Kurra C, Taylor K, Wells B, Sharma A, Leon A:
Catamenial rectus abdominis pain associated
with scar endometriosis status-post low transverse cesarean section
. Cureus. 2018, 10:e3778.
10.7759/cureus.3778
10
.
Kocakusak A, Arpinar E, Arikan S, Demirbag N, Tarlaci A, Kabaca C:
Abdominal wall endometriosis: a
diagnostic dilemma for surgeons
. Med Princ Pract. 2005, 14:434-7.
10.1159/000088118
11
.
Ioannis TK, Sofia P:
Abdominal wall endometriosis after cesarean section
. HJOG. 2017, 16:25-30.
12
.
Slaiki S, Jamor J:
Endometriosis of the rectus abdominis muscles: a rare case of dual location
. J Surg Case
Rep. 2020, 2020:rjaa360.
10.1093/jscr/rjaa360
13
.
Marci R, Lo Monte G, Soave I, Bianchi A, Patella A, Wenger JM:
Rectus abdominis muscle endometriotic
mass in a woman affected by multiple sclerosis
. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013, 39:462-5.
10.1111/j.1447-
0756.2012.01933.x
14
.
Ibrahim MG, Delarue E, Abesadze E, Haas M, Sehouli J, Chiantera V, Mechsner S:
Abdominal wall
endometriosis: myofibroblasts as a possible evidence of metaplasia: a case report
. Gynecol Obstet Invest.
2017, 82:96-101.
10.1159/000452101
15
.
Coeman V, Sciot R, Van Breuseghem I:
Case report. Rectus abdominis endometriosis: a report of two cases
.
Br J Radiol. 2005, 78:68-71.
10.1259/bjr/28183033
16
.
Roberge RJ, Kantor WJ, Scorza L:
Rectus abdominis endometrioma
. Am J Emerg Med. 1999, 17:675-7.
10.1016/s0735-6757(99)90157-2
17
.
Granese R, Cucinella G, Barresi V, Navarra G, Candiani M, Triolo O:
Isolated endometriosis on the rectus
abdominis muscle in women without a history of abdominal surgery: a rare and intriguing finding
. J Minim
Invasive Gynecol. 2009, 16:798-801.
10.1016/j.jmig.2009.08.005
18
.
Bozkurt M, Çil AS, Bozkurt DK:
Intramuscular abdominal wall endometriosis treated by ultrasound-guided
2024 Kalfoutzou et al. Cureus 16(3): e55462. DOI 10.7759/cureus.55462
5
of
6
ethanol injection
. Clin Med Res. 2014, 12:160-5.
10.3121/cmr.2013.1183
19
.
Gourgiotis S, Veloudis G, Pallas N, Lagos P, Salemis NS, Villias C:
Abdominal wall endometriosis: report of
two cases
. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2008, 49:553-5.
20
.
Coccia ME, Rizzello F, Nannini S, Cozzolino M, Capezzuoli T, Castiglione F:
Ultrasound-guided excision of
rectus abdominis muscle endometriosis
. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015, 41:149-52.
10.1111/jog.12502
21
.
Arakawa T, Fukuda S, Hirata T, et al.:
PAX8: a highly sensitive marker for the glands in extragenital
endometriosis
. Reprod Sci. 2020, 27:1580-6.
10.1007/s43032-020-00186-7
22
.
Yang Q, Zhang X:
Efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for rectus abdominis
endometriosis: a 7-year follow-up clinical study
. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023, 13:1417-25.
10.21037/qims-22-695
23
.
Saliba C, Jaafoury H, El Hajj M, Nicolas G, Haidar Ahmad H:
Abdominal wall endometriosis: a case report
.
Cureus. 2019, 11:e4061.
10.7759/cureus.4061
24
.
Thanasa A, Thanasa E, Kamaretsos E, Gerokostas EE, Thanasas I:
Extrapelvic endometriosis located
individually in the rectus abdominis muscle: a rare cause of chronic pelvic pain (a case report)
. Pan Afr Med
J. 2022, 42:242.
10.11604/pamj.2022.42.242.36325
25
.
Mishin I, Mishina A, Zaharia S, Zastavnitsky G:
Rectus abdominis endometrioma after caesarean section
.
Case Rep Surg. 2016, 2016:4312753.
10.1155/2016/4312753
26
.
Goker A, Sarsmaz K, Pekindil G, Kandiloglu AR, Kuscu NK:
Rectus abdominis muscle endometriosis
. J Coll
Physicians Surg Pak. 2014, 24:944-6.
2024 Kalfoutzou et al. Cureus 16(3): e55462. DOI 10.7759/cureus.55462
6
of
6
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.