[Management of endometriomas in France: A survey of practices]

C Honde, Andrea Agostini, A Agostini, Audrey Pivano, A Pivano, L Piechon, B Courbiere, Blandine Courbière, A Netter
Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie · 2023 · vol. 51(9) , pp. 408–414 · doi:10.1016/j.gofs.2023.06.003 · PMID:37353080 · W4381486952
article OA: green CC0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-11 ⓘ

This survey investigated current management practices for endometriomas in France, aiming to understand physician approaches.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text ⓘ

The provided text does not include the content of the research paper; it is a web “Making sure you're not a bot!” protection page explaining that automated scraping is blocked using a Proof-of-Work (Anubis) mechanism. Because the actual study methods, population, results, and limitations are not present, no biomedical findings can be summarized from the provided material. The excerpt therefore does not allow an assessment of what the paper studied regarding endometriomas in France or what it concluded. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — the title indicates it concerns endométriomes (ovarian endometriomas) management practices in France, though the actual paper text was not accessible in the supplied content.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To present an overview of French practices for the management of endometriomas. METHODS: We carried out a nationwide survey of practices concerning the management of endometriomas between October 2021 and January 2022. This study was carried out by means of two questionnaires sent to surgical centers used to treat endometriosis (n=62) and to Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) centers (n=102). RESULTS: At the end of the survey, 39/62 (62.9%) surgical teams from the centers contacted had given a response and 51/102 (50.0%) from ART centers. Laparoscopic cystectomy was the technique most frequently used by almost two thirds of the surgical teams (61%) when there was no known infertility, whereas it was the most common technique for only 14% of the ART teams. On the contrary, ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy was the most frequent technique for more than half of the ART teams (56%) and for only 8% of the surgical teams. In case of recurrence, 49% of surgical teams would choose ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy. Prior to IVF, 73% of ARP teams stated that they 'rarely' treated endometriomas. CONCLUSION: The results of our study show a certain variability in practices between different centers and depending on the presence or absence of infertility for the management of endometriomas in France.
Full text 1,068 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Making sure you're not a bot! Loading... You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone. Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive. Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate. Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (28)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-17T06:13:18.893374+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-17T06:12:12.771314+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK