Endometrial compaction is associated with increased clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in unstimulated natural cycle frozen embryo transfers: a prospective cohort study.

OA: closed

Abstract

PurposeTo investigate the association between endometrial compaction and pregnancy rates in unstimulated natural cycle frozen embryo transfers.DesignA single-center prospective cohort study. Endometrial thickness by transvaginal ultrasound and blood progesterone levels on the day of ovulation and the day of embryo transfer were evaluated in patients undergoing natural cycle frozen embryo transfer. Compaction was defined as > 5% decrease in endometrial thickness between ovulation day and day of transfer. Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in cycles with and without compaction were compared.ResultsSeventy-one women were included, of which 44% had endometrial compaction, with similar rates when subdividing the patients by day of transfer (day 3 or day 5). Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were higher in the compaction group compared to the non-compaction group (0.58 vs. 0.16, P < 0.001; 0.52 vs. 0.13, P  10% and > 15% revealed similar pregnancy rates as > 5%, with no added benefit to higher degrees of compaction.ConclusionsAbout half the patients in our study undergoing unstimulated natural cycle frozen embryo transfer experienced compaction of the endometrium, occurring as early as day 3 post-ovulation. This was significantly correlated with increased clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates.
Full text 10,952 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the association between endometrial compaction and pregnancy rates in unstimulated natural cycle frozen embryo transfers. Design A single-center prospective cohort study. Endometrial thickness by transvaginal ultrasound and blood progesterone levels on the day of ovulation and the day of embryo transfer were evaluated in patients undergoing natural cycle frozen embryo transfer. Compaction was defined as > 5% decrease in endometrial thickness between ovulation day and day of transfer. Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in cycles with and without compaction were compared.

Results

Seventy-one women were included, of which 44% had endometrial compaction, with similar rates when subdividing the patients by day of transfer (day 3 or day 5). Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were higher in the compaction group compared to the non-compaction group (0.58 vs. 0.16, P < 0.001; 0.52 vs. 0.13, P 10% and > 15% revealed similar pregnancy rates as > 5%, with no added benefit to higher degrees of compaction.

Conclusions

About half the patients in our study undergoing unstimulated natural cycle frozen embryo transfer experienced compaction of the endometrium, occurring as early as day 3 post-ovulation. This was significantly correlated with increased clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Bergin K, Eliner Y, Duvall DW, Roger S, Elguero S, Penzias AS, Sakkas D, Vaughan DA. The use of propensity score matching to assess the benefit of the endometrial receptivity analysis in frozen embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:396–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.031. Bu, Z., Yang, X., Song, L., Kang, B., Sun, Y., 2019. The impact of endometrial thickness change after progesterone administration on pregnancy outcome in patients transferred with single frozen-thawed blastocyst. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0545-0 Casper RF. Frozen embryo transfer: evidence-based markers for successful endometrial preparation. Fertil Steril. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.008. Casper RF, Yanushpolsky EH. Optimal endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer cycles: window of implantation and progesterone support. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:867–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.006. Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens JJ, Coomarasamy A. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:202–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmy044. Fleischer AC, Pittaway DE, Beard LA, Thieme GA, Bundy AL, James AE, Wentz AC. Sonographic depiction of endometrial changes occurring with ovulation induction. J Ultrasound Med. 1984;3:341–6. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1984.3.8.341. Franasiak JM, Scott RT. Reproductive tract microbiome in assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1364–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.012. Gonen Y, Casper RF. Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer. 1990. Haahr T, Jensen JS, Thomsen L, Duus L, Rygaard K, Humaidan P. Abnormal vaginal microbiota may be associated with poor reproductive outcomes: a prospective study in IVF patients. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:795–803. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew026. Haas J, Smith R, Zilberberg E, Nayot D, Meriano J, Barzilay E, Casper RF. Endometrial compaction (decreased thickness) in response to progesterone results in optimal pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:503-509.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.001. Hu M, Li J, Zhang Y, Li X, Brännström M, Shao LR, Billig H. Endometrial progesterone receptor isoforms in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Am J Transl Res. 2018;10:2696–705. Huang, J., Lin, J., Cai, R., Lu, X., Song, N., Gao, H., Kuang, Y., 2020. Significance of endometrial thickness change after human chorionic gonadotrophin triggering in modified natural cycles for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Ann Transl Med 8. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1459 ıaz-Gimeno PD, Horcajadas JA, Mart ınez-Conejero JA, Esteban FJ, Alam P, Pellicer A, Simon C. GENETICS A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:50–60.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.063. Jokubkiene L, Sladkevicius P, Rovas L, Valentin L. Assessment of changes in endometrial and subendometrial volume and vascularity during the normal menstrual cycle using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:672–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2742. Liu KE, Hartman M, Hartman A, Luo Z-C, Mahutte N. The impact of a thin endometrial lining on fresh and frozen-thaw IVF outcomes: an analysis of over 40 000 embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1883–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey281. Mackens S, Santos-Ribeiro S, van de Vijver A, Racca A, Van Landuyt L, Tournaye H, Blockeel C. Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:2234–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex285. Martins WP, Raine-Fenning NJ, Leite SP, Ferriani RA, Nastri CO. A standardized measurement technique may improve the reliability of measurements of endometrial thickness and volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:107–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/UOG.9016. Moreno I, Codoñer FM, Vilella F, Valbuena D, Martinez-Blanch JF, Jimenez-Almazán J, Alonso R, Alamá P, Remohí J, Pellicer A, Ramon D, Simon C. Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:684–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075. Moreno I, Franasiak JM. Endometrial microbiota—new player in town. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:32–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.034. Munné S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli JL, Child T, Nakhuda G, Shamma FN, Silverberg K, Kalista T, Handyside AH, Katz-Jaffe M, Wells D, Gordon T, Stock-Myer S, Willman S, Acacio B, Lavery S, Carby A, Boostanfar R, Forman R, Sedler M, Jackson A, Jordan K, Schoolcraft W, McReynolds S, Schnell V, Loy R, Chantilis S, Ku L, Frattarelli J, Morales A, Craig HR, Perloe M, Witz C, Wang WH, Wilcox J, Norian J, Thompson SM, Chen S, Garrisi J, Walmsley R, Mendola R, Pang S, Sakkas D, Rooney K, Sneeringer R, Glassner M, Wilton L, Martic M, Coleman P, Shepley S, Mounce G, Griffiths T, Feinberg RF, Blauer K, Reggio B, Rhinehart R, Ziegler W, Ahmed H, Kratka S, Rosenbluth E, Ivani K, Thyer A, Minter T, Miller C, Gysler M, Saunders P, Casper R, Conway D, Hughes M, Large M, Blazek J, Fragouli E, Alfarawati S. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:1071-1079.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2019.07.1346. Patel, B.G., Rudnicki, M., Yu, J., Shu, Y., Taylor, R.N., 2017. Progesterone resistance in endometriosis: origins, consequences and interventions. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13156 Racowsky C, Vernon M, Mayer J, David Ball G, Behr B, Pomeroy KO, Wininger D, Gibbons W, Conaghan J, Stern JE. Standardization of grading embryo morphology. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:437–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9443-2. Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Kendall NR, Johnson IR. Defining endometrial growth during the menstrual cycle with three-dimensional ultrasound. BJOG. 2004;111:944–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00214.x. Riestenberg C, Quinn M, Akopians A, Danzer H, Surrey M, Ghadir S, Kroener L. Endometrial compaction does not predict live birth rate in single euploid frozen embryo transfer cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:407–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02043-7. Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Díaz-Gimeno P, Gómez E, Fernández-Sánchez M, Carranza F, Carrera J, Vilella F, Pellicer A, Simón C. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:818–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2013.05.004. Tabibzadeh S. Proliferative activity of lymphoid cells in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;70:437–43. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-70-2-437. Usadi RS, Groll JM, Lessey BA, Lininger RA, Zaino RJ, Fritz MA, Young SL. Endometrial development and function in experimentally induced luteal phase deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4058–64. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-0460. Ye J, Zhang J, Gao H, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Cai R, Kuang Y. Effect of endometrial thickness change in response to progesterone administration on pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: Analysis of 4465 Cycles. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.546232. Z, Y., J, L., GS, C., SA, S., X, L., SS, L., AC, P., ES, S., RD, S., 2012. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol. Cytogenet. 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-5-24 Zilberberg E, Smith R, Nayot D, Haas J, Meriano J, Barzilay E, Casper RF. Endometrial compaction before frozen euploid embryo transfer improves ongoing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2020;113:990–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.030. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions A. H., M. Y., and S. A. designed the study. All authors contributed to data collection, M. Y., A. H., and S.A. drafted the first version of the manuscript. M. Y., A. H., and S. A. contributed to data analysis and interpretation. All authors revised the manuscript and approved the final submitted version. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary Information Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Youngster, M., Mor, M., Kedem, A. et al. Endometrial compaction is associated with increased clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in unstimulated natural cycle frozen embryo transfers: a prospective cohort study. J Assist Reprod Genet 39, 1909–1916 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02544-7 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02544-7

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-16T09:21:09.727480+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-17T06:25:09.426038+00:00