Elevated basal FSH levels, if it is under 15 IU/L, will not reflect poor ART outcomes
Observational
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This study of 191 ART cycles found that basal FSH levels below 15 IU/L do not predict poor outcomes, as pregnancy rates remained comparable to those with lower FSH despite reduced oocyte retrieval.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
PURPOSE: For this study, the impact of basal FSH levels on ART outcomes was assessed.
METHODS: From June 2003 to May 2006, 191 ART cycles were performed in our hospital. All cases were treated with GnRH-a long protocol. The patients were classified according to their basal FSH level as follows: group A: FSH <10 IU/l, group B: 10 <or= FSH <15 IU/l, and group C: 15 IU/l <or= FSH. ART outcomes were compared among the three groups.
RESULTS: The number of retrieved oocytes in group A was significantly higher than in group B, but fertilized oocytes and the pregnancy rates were comparable. The pregnancy rate in group C was not significantly lower than those found in either group A or B, but the trend was lower.
CONCLUSION: Oocytes retrieved from the patients who showed basal FSH levels below 15 IU/l were found to possess significant pregnancy potential.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:05:01.267406+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-15T06:24:24.424788+00:00