What is the success of ultrasonography of benign adnexal masses?
other
OA: closed
public-domain-us
Abstract
AIM: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasonographic discrimination of benign adnexal masses.
METHODS: This was a prospective study, evaluating 245 consecutive cases using real-time gray-scale ultrasonography in a tertiary education hospital.
RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy was high for simple cysts and solid masses as κ-values of 0.824 and 0.816 and accuracy was moderate for endometriomas, dermoid cysts and cystadenomas as κ-values of 0.758, 0.689 and 0.627, respectively, and low for hemorrhagic cysts as a κ-value of 0.587. A logistic regression model was developed using ultrasonographic characteristics of the adnexal masses. Irregularity at lining of the inner wall, presence of solid component, papillary projections and echogenicity were shown to have a strong impact on the diagnosis of benign masses.
CONCLUSION: Although ultrasonography is a useful technique for the diagnosis of benign adnexal masses, it is limited in diagnostic accuracy. Pattern recognition is the most favored method for ultrasonographic diagnosis. Logistic regression analysis can contribute to diagnostic accuracy.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-07-18T06:13:54.626559+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:47.062786+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-07-18T06:52:13.688204+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine