Circulating microRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers in endometriosis diagnosis – a systematic review

review OA: gold CC0
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This systematic review of 32 studies found that while numerous circulating microRNAs are dysregulated in endometriosis, only a few, like miR-17-5p, were consistently reported across multiple investigations.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This systematic review aimed to summarize human studies evaluating differential expression of circulating microRNAs in patients with endometriosis using blood-based assays (whole blood, plasma, or serum), comparing against asymptomatic participants or those with negative laparoscopy. Searches in PubMed (up to November 17, 2022) identified 292 articles, with 32 included, and the review reports that across studies only limited overlap existed, with a total of 20 microRNAs dysregulated in endometriosis in at least two studies. The most frequently reported dysregulated microRNAs were miR-17-5p (six studies), followed by miR-451a and let-7b-5p (four studies each), with several others reported in three studies. A major limitation stated is that no meta-analysis was possible, limiting quantitative synthesis across heterogeneous studies. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it systematically reviews circulating microRNA biomarker studies for non-invasive endometriosis diagnosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Any ASRM stage [19] of en-dometriosis, any menstrual stage and any technique for miRNA expression analysis were allowed. Participant or population Patients with endometriosis.Intervention Assesment of circulating biomarkers.Comparator Asymptomatic patients or negative laparoscopy for endometriosis.Study designs to be included Prospective, retrospective or case-control studies.Eligibility criteria 1) article available in English; 2) humans as study subjects; 3) miRNA analysis performed in whole blood, plasma or serum; 4) prospective, retrospective or case-control studies; 5) published in a peer-reviewed journal.Information sources Pubmed + cross-referencing.Main outcome(s) Some but limited overlap was found between the 32 articles included, with a total of 20 miR-NAs reported as dysregulated in endometriosis in two or more studies.MiR-17-5p was reported as dysregulated in six studies, followed by miR-451a and let-7b-5p in four studies and miR-20a-5p, miR-143-3p, miR-199a-5p and miR-3613-5p in three studies.Quality assessment / Risk of bias analysis Not applicable. Strategy of data synthesis No meta-analysis was possible.Subgroup analysis Seperate analysis for serum and plasma.Sensitivity analysis Not performed.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK