Circulating microRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers in endometriosis diagnosis – a systematic review
This systematic review of 32 studies found that while numerous circulating microRNAs are dysregulated in endometriosis, only a few, like miR-17-5p, were consistently reported across multiple investigations.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This systematic review aimed to summarize human studies evaluating differential expression of circulating microRNAs in patients with endometriosis using blood-based assays (whole blood, plasma, or serum), comparing against asymptomatic participants or those with negative laparoscopy. Searches in PubMed (up to November 17, 2022) identified 292 articles, with 32 included, and the review reports that across studies only limited overlap existed, with a total of 20 microRNAs dysregulated in endometriosis in at least two studies. The most frequently reported dysregulated microRNAs were miR-17-5p (six studies), followed by miR-451a and let-7b-5p (four studies each), with several others reported in three studies. A major limitation stated is that no meta-analysis was possible, limiting quantitative synthesis across heterogeneous studies. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it systematically reviews circulating microRNA biomarker studies for non-invasive endometriosis diagnosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00