Experimental Endometriosis: Review of the Literature Through a Century and the Iranian Experience.

In: Practical medicine · 2012 · vol. 21(11) , pp. 536–543 · W2902625720
article OA: green CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This review examines prominent articles on experimental endometriosis, detailing animal models and techniques used to study the disease, with a specific focus on Iranian literature.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This paper reviews a century of experimental endometriosis research, tracing how animal models evolved from early attempts to support Sampson’s retrograde menstruation theory to contemporary use of experimental endometriosis for studying pathogenesis and potential treatments. It summarizes the variety of animal species and experimental techniques used across the literature. The review highlights a major limitation: experimental models are discussed as a large body of work, but the authors note that ethical considerations have limited direct testing of novel treatments in subjects, and they emphasize the historical shift in prevailing mechanisms rather than providing new experimental outcomes. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it surveys and contextualizes animal-model methodologies and historical development of experimental endometriosis, including attention to Iranian literature.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Although endometriosis is not a newly discovered disease, it has still remained enigmatic. Understanding the pathophysiology of this disease is still one of the challenges of gynecology and reproductive medicine. Therefore, the subject of endometriosis treatment faces many questions to be answered. Even though this is not considered to be a rare disease, testing novel treatments on subjects is definitely contrary to medical ethics. This is where importance of animal studies is emphasized. History of animal studies on endometriosis dates back to the time when the young John Sampson presented his theory of retrograde flow of menstruation to the gynecologic society of his time to explain the mechanism of endometriosis. However, most of the medical society of that time favored metaplasia as the main mechanism over the new theory. In order to prove Sampson's theory, animal models were used to induce endometriosis, and that was the first study of experimental endometriosis. Nowadays, although no one uses animals to evaluate Sampson theory of endometriosis, however, experimental endometriosis is widely used to study many different aspects of the disease from pathogenesis to possible options for treatments. Also, since then, various animals and different techniques have been proposed and so there is a huge body of literature on experimental endometriosis. Contrary to many countries, Iranian medical societies have neglected animal models for endometriosis until recently. This review article aims to go through the prominent articles on the subject and introduce different animals and methods to its readers and have a special look at Iranian literature on experimental endometriosis.
Full text 2,535 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Experimental Endometriosis: Review of the Literature Through a Century and the Iranian Experience Loading... Files Article version publishedVersion Publication type Article | Artikkeli Fulltext Permanent address Link to the original publication Identifiers Collections Open item in UEF Cris Journal Title Journal ISSN Volume Title Citation Alborzi, S. Azimirad, A. Azimirad, M. (2018). Experimental Endometriosis: Review of the Literature Through a Century and the Iranian Experience. Archives of iranian medicine, 21(11), 536-543. http://www.aimjournal.ir/Article/aim-1846Title in other language Authors Editors Organizational Units Publisher Academy of Medical Sciences of the I.R. Iran Archives of iranian medicine, ISSN: 1029-2977 Additional information Copyright © Authors Licenced under CC BY 4.0 (more information) Date Abstract Although endometriosis is not a newly discovered disease, it has still remained enigmatic. Understanding the pathophysiology of this disease is still one of the challenges of gynecology and reproductive medicine. Therefore, the subject of endometriosis treatment faces many questions to be answered. Even though this is not considered to be a rare disease, testing novel treatments on subjects is definitely contrary to medical ethics. This is where importance of animal studies is emphasized. History of animal studies on endometriosis dates back to the time when the young John Sampson presented his theory of retrograde flow of menstruation to the gynecologic society of his time to explain the mechanism of endometriosis. However, most of the medical society of that time favored metaplasia as the main mechanism over the new theory. In order to prove Sampson’s theory, animal models were used to induce endometriosis, and that was the first study of experimental endometriosis. Nowadays, although no one uses animals to evaluate Sampson theory of endometriosis, however, experimental endometriosis is widely used to study many different aspects of the disease from pathogenesis to possible options for treatments. Also, since then, various animals and different techniques have been proposed and so there is a huge body of literature on experimental endometriosis. Contrary to many countries, Iranian medical societies have neglected animal models for endometriosis until recently. This review article aims to go through the prominent articles on the subject and introduce different animals and methods to its readers and have a special look at Iranian literature on experimental endometriosis.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (4)

Cited by (4)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK