Comparing intra-uterine injection of mononuclear cells and platelet-rich plasma on the pregnancy rate of women with recurrent implantation failure: An RCT
This randomized trial compared intrauterine injections of activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells versus platelet-rich plasma for recurrent implantation failure, finding both treatments significantly improved pregnancy rates over controls without significant differences between the two interventions.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This randomized clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of intrauterine injections of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in improving pregnancy rates among women with recurrent implantation failure. The study included 96 participants who were divided into control, PBMC, and PRP groups, with treatments administered two days before embryo transfer to modulate endometrial receptivity through cytokine regulation and growth factor stimulation. Although the researchers aimed to compare biochemical and clinical pregnancy outcomes, the provided text indicates that no significant differences were observed between the groups for the measured variables. Relevance to endometriosis: The paper explicitly lists endometriosis as an exclusion criterion, meaning the study population was specifically selected to be free of this condition.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
18,982 characters
· extracted from
pmc-nxml
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Section
Coi Statement
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-04T09:26:46.659050+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:47:53.823720+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T02:00:01.467718+00:00