Letrozole and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0

Abstract

BackgroundRecently, letrozole has been used to prevent moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in assisted reproductive technology cycles due to its estrogen-reducing and androgen-increasing effects on the ovaries, affecting granulosa cells, and reducing vascular endothelial growth factor production.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the impact of letrozole consumption in preventing OHSS in infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization.Materials and methodsIn this cross-sectional study, among 1743 medical records of infertile women who were scheduled for oocyte retrieval at Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd, Iran. Data of 343 women with polycystic ovarian syndrome diagnosis and at risk of OHSS was extracted from March 2022-2023. The stimulation was carried out using a flexible gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. Women were divided into 2 groups based on whether they received letrozole or not. In the letrozole group, 2.5 mg letrozole twice daily was continued from the trigger day, while in the control group, women did not receive letrozole. The parameters of OHSS severity, hospitalization rates, and the need for albumin prescription were analyzed.Results89 women in the letrozole and 254 women in the control group were examined. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of age and body mass index; however, anti-Mullerian hormone was significantly higher than control group (7.53 ± 4.61 vs. 5.47 ± 3.63, p < 0.001). The parameters of OHSS severity, hospitalization rates, and the need for albumin prescription showed no significant differences between the groups.ConclusionRecent study indicates that incorporating letrozole into the treatment of GnRH antagonists and cabergoline does not reduce the OHSS severity.
Full text 13,828 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 2 sections · click to expand

Section

Elham Nikfarjam: drafting of the manuscript, concept, and design, Maryam Eftekhar: had full access to all the data in the study and took responsibility for concept and design, the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Hanieh Fatehi and Sahereh Arabian: acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data. All authors: drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

Coi Statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-23T09:30:01.253652+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T02:00:01.467718+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0