Association Between Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Exposure Duration and Breast Cancer Incidence
This study found that levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) use is associated with increased breast cancer risk, particularly during the initial years of exposure.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective cohort study used Korean National Health Insurance Claims data (2013–2022) to examine whether the duration of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) use is associated with breast cancer incidence among 2,094,029 women aged 30–49 who had initial diagnoses of endometriosis, uterine leiomyomas, or abnormal uterine bleeding (2014–2017), with propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards models. Among 61,010 women included in the matched cohort, breast cancer incidence was higher in LNG-IUS users (223 vs 154 cases per 100,000 person-years), and LNG-IUS exposure was associated with increased breast cancer risk (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.192–1.585). Time-stratified analyses suggested particularly elevated risk during the initial years of use, with early-use hazard ratios highest for those with less than 3 years exposure, while later periods showed lower or attenuated estimates. The study is based on claims data and includes only women with those specified baseline diagnoses, which may limit generalizability. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it analyzes LNG-IUS exposure duration and breast cancer incidence in a cohort of women whose initial diagnoses include endometriosis, alongside leiomyomas and abnormal uterine bleeding.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,683 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Objective
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-18T06:15:08.409253+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-06-18T06:12:04.812000+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-18T06:36:33.011116+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine