The role of the junctional zone in the diagnosis and treatment of adenomyosis

In: Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases · 2026 · vol. 75(2) , pp. 54–63 · doi:10.17816/jowd692632 · W7163803450
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12

This study evaluated junctional zone parameters for adenomyosis diagnosis and found them to be of limited diagnostic significance but useful for monitoring treatment response, with thickness and uniformity decreasing after therapy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12 · read from full text

This prospective cross-sectional, single-center study evaluated the diagnostic significance of uterine junctional zone parameters in 344 women (287 diagnosed with adenomyosis and 57 controls) using expert ultrasound (color Doppler, elastography, and volume reconstruction) and a proprietary comprehensive ultrasound scoring method, with junctional zone assessment performed for all participants. The authors found that junctional zone assessment differed between adenomyosis groups and controls, but reported that overall diagnostic significance was small due to visualization variability in some patients; however, thickness and uniformity could be used as part of a complex diagnostic approach. In a subset of 156 patients, junctional zone size decreased after treatment at 6 months, particularly with combined resveratrol plus dienogest (p=0.03). The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index, but its focus is centrally about adenomyosis junctional zone parameters and their monitoring during therapy. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — it tests junctional zone thickness/uniformity for diagnosis and tracks junctional zone dynamics during treatment.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Timely diagnosis of adenomyosis remains important due to the high incidence of the disease among women of reproductive age. Interest in using myometrial transition zone parameters in diagnostic algorithms has persisted since the first data on it as a marker for adenomyosis emerged. However, the role and clinical significance of the junctional zone in patients with adenomyosis currently remain a subject of scientific debate due to the inconsistency of the available data. Furthermore, the literature lacks information on its dynamics and changes under the influence of various therapies. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic significance of the junctional zone parameters in adenomyosis and their changes during the treatment of the disease. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional, single-center study was conducted. All patients underwent ultrasound examination using an expert-class GE Voluson E10 (GE Healthcare, USA) with IC5-9-D and RIC6-12-D probes, color Doppler mapping, elastography, and volume reconstruction. To diagnose adenomyosis, we used the results of a comprehensive ultrasound examination using a patented proprietary scoring method. All patients underwent a junctional zone assessment. Results: 344 women were examined: 287 with a diagnosis of adenomyosis, of whom 273 had complaints and 14 were without complaints, and 57 patients in the control group. Significant differences were found in the assessment of the junctional zone in the main groups and the control group (p = 0.37). In 156 patients, the junctional zone was assessed before and 6 months after treatment of adenomyosis using several regimens: resveratrol 100 mg daily, dienogest 2 mg daily, and resveratrol 100 mg + dienogest 2 mg daily. During treatment, the average size of the junctional zone decreased, especially after combined treatment (p = 0.03). Conclusion: The significance of the assessment of the junctional zone in the diagnosis of adenomyosis is currently small, due to the peculiarities of its visualization in some patients, however, the assessment of the thickness and uniformity of the junctional zone can be successfully used in the complex diagnosis of the disease. Furthermore, dynamic assessment of these parameters is a useful tool for monitoring treatment effectiveness, particularly during maintenance therapy.
Full text 9,034 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background: Timely diagnosis of adenomyosis remains important due to the high incidence of the disease among women of reproductive age. Interest in using myometrial transition zone parameters in diagnostic algorithms has persisted since the first data on it as a marker for adenomyosis emerged. However, the role and clinical significance of the junctional zone in patients with adenomyosis currently remain a subject of scientific debate due to the inconsistency of the available data. Furthermore, the literature lacks information on its dynamics and changes under the influence of various therapies. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic significance of the junctional zone parameters in adenomyosis and their changes during the treatment of the disease.

Methods

A prospective cross-sectional, single-center study was conducted. All patients underwent ultrasound examination using an expert-class GE Voluson E10 (GE Healthcare, USA) with IC5-9-D and RIC6-12-D probes, color Doppler mapping, elastography, and volume reconstruction. To diagnose adenomyosis, we used the results of a comprehensive ultrasound examination using a patented proprietary scoring method. All patients underwent a junctional zone assessment.

Results

344 women were examined: 287 with a diagnosis of adenomyosis, of whom 273 had complaints and 14 were without complaints, and 57 patients in the control group. Significant differences were found in the assessment of the junctional zone in the main groups and the control group (p = 0.37). In 156 patients, the junctional zone was assessed before and 6 months after treatment of adenomyosis using several regimens: resveratrol 100 mg daily, dienogest 2 mg daily, and resveratrol 100 mg + dienogest 2 mg daily. During treatment, the average size of the junctional zone decreased, especially after combined treatment (p = 0.03).

Conclusion

The significance of the assessment of the junctional zone in the diagnosis of adenomyosis is currently small, due to the peculiarities of its visualization in some patients, however, the assessment of the thickness and uniformity of the junctional zone can be successfully used in the complex diagnosis of the disease. Furthermore, dynamic assessment of these parameters is a useful tool for monitoring treatment effectiveness, particularly during maintenance therapy. Full Text About the authors Stanislava V. Nagorneva The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott Author for correspondence. Email: [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0402-5304 SPIN-code: 5109-7613 MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine) Russian Federation, 3 Mendeleevskaya Line, Saint Petersburg, 199034Maria A. Shalina The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott Email: [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5921-3217 SPIN-code: 6673-2660 MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine) Russian Federation, 3 Mendeleevskaya Line, Saint Petersburg, 199034Maria I. Yarmolinskaya The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott Email: [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6551-4147 SPIN-code: 3686-3605 MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation Russian Federation, 3 Mendeleevskaya Line, Saint Petersburg, 199034References - Demidov VN. Extragenital endometriosis ultrasound diagnostics. Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics. 2010;(3):102–111. EDN: NCZEVT - Yarmolinskaya MI, Ailamazyan EK. Genital endometriosis. Various aspects of the problem. St. Petersburg: Eco-Vector; 2017: 615. (In Russ.) EDN: XYSZVJ - Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):284–98. doi: 10.1002/uog.14806 - Harmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw RA, et al. Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60(1):118–131. doi: 10.1002/uog.24786 EDN: OGHKJK - Kepkep K, Tuncay YA, Göynümer G, Tutal E. Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings are most accurate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:341–345. doi: 10.1002/uog.3985 - Benagiano G, Brosens I. Adenomyosis and endometriosis have a common origin. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. 2011;61(2):146–152. doi: 10.1007/s13224-011-0030-y EDN: BOOYKY - Hricak H, Alpers C, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;141(6):1119–28. doi: 10.2214/ajr.141.6.1119 - Exacoustos C, Brienza L, Di Giovanni A, et al. Adenomyosis: three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;37(4):471–479. doi: 10.1002/uog.8900 - Exacoustos C, Luciano D, Corbett B, et al The uterine junctional zone: a 3-dimensional ultrasound study of patients with endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(3):248.e1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.006 - Rasmussen CK, Hansen ES, Ernst E, Dueholm M. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography for diagnosis of adenomyosis of the inner myometrium. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(5):750–760. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.033 - Yarmolinskaya MI, Shalina MA, Nagorneva SV. New possibilities of ultrasound diagnostics and modern strategy of drug therapy for adenomyosis. Farmateka. 2022;29(6):101–108. doi: 10.18565/pharmateca.2022.6.101-107 EDN: CVBLKM - Tomassetti C, Johnson NP, Petrozza J, et al. International working group of AAGL, ESGE, ESHRE and WES. An international terminology for endometriosis, 2021. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(11):1849–1859. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.032 EDN: SNDUQU - Yarmolinskaya MI, Shalina MA, Nagorneva SV. Modern approaches to classification of adenomyosis. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2023;72(1):97–108. doi: 10.17816/JOWD121307. EDN: NZZPMZ - Patent RUS № RU2764106/ 13.01.2022. Nagorneva SV, Shalina MA, Yarmolinskaya MI, et al. Method of diagnosis of adenomyosis. Available from: https://patenton.ru/patent/RU2764106C1?ysclid=moctdb49zd267073198 (In Russ.) EDN: BCYRSL - Fusi L, Cloke B, Brosens JJ. The uterine junctional zone. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(4):479–91. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.02.001 - Chan RW, Schwab KE, Gargett CE. Clonogenicity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. BiolReprod. 2004;70(6):1738–1750. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.024109 - Maheshwari A, Gurunath S, Fatima F, Bhattacharya S. Adenomyosis and subfertility: a systematic review of prevalence, diagnosis, treatment and fertility outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(4):374–92. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms006 - Mogilnaja GM, Simovonik AN. The junctional zone of the uterus and its predictors in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Crimean Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine. 2018;(1):55–66. EDN: UUXGVK - Meylaerts LJ, Wijnen L, Grieten M, et al. Junctional zone thickness in young nulliparous women according to menstrual cycle and hormonal contraception use. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34(2):212–220. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.10.013 - Shen X, Duan H, Wang S, et al. Expression of Cannabinoid Receptors in Myometrium and its Correlation With Dysmenorrhea in Adenomyosis. Reprod Sci. 2019;26(12):1618–1625. doi: 10.1177/1933719119833483 EDN: GLRLID - Zhang Y, Yu P, Sun FJ, et al. Expression of oxytocin receptors in the uterine junctional zone in women with adenomyosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(4):412–8. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12595 - Vannuccini S, Luisi S, Tosti C, et al. Role of medical therapy in the management of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):398–405. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.013 EDN: YGYSUP - Strowitzki T, Marr J, Gerlinger C, et al. Dienogest is as effective as leuprolide acetate in treating the painful symptoms of endometriosis: a 24-week, randomized, multicentre, open-label trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(3):633–41. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep469 - Yarmolinskaya MI, Shalina MA, Beganova AK, Seyidova CI. Prospects for the combined use of trans-resveratrol and indole-3-carbinol in endometriosis. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022;(4):14–24. doi: 10.18565/aig.2022.4.14-24 EDN: IEOGPS

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (20)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-07-29T06:03:29.314569+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-31T06:42:51.797318+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK