Histological audit of acute appendicitis

Other OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-29 ⓘ

A histological audit of 100 acute appendicitis specimens identified reporting discrepancies, proposing five standardized categories to improve uniformity and clarity in pathological descriptions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

One hundred retrospective appendectomy specimens were examined in an attempt to study the degree of uniformity and clarity of reporting of this common surgical specimen. There was full agreement in 73 cases and some degree of discrepancy in 27 cases. It is suggested that greater clarity in reporting can be achieved with five reporting categories: (i) established acute inflammation; (ii) no evidence of acute inflammation ("normal"); (iii) features suggestive of early inflammation; (iv) peri-appendicitis; (v) other features, such as granulomata, Enterobius vermicularis, tumours, etc.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Appendicitis Appendix Medical Audit Pathology Department, Hospital Acute Disease Adolescent Adult Aged Appendicitis Appendix Child Child, Preschool England Female Humans Infant Male Middle Aged Pathology Department, Hospital Retrospective Studies

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:03:11.681822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-11T06:28:45.473802+00:00