Keywords
chronic nonspecific endometritis, aspiration biopsy, abnormal uterine bleeding
1. Introduction
The endometrium is the internal lining of the womb (uterus), where the embryo implants and
grows during pregnancy. Endometritis is the inflammation of the endometrial lining of the
uterus. In addition to the endometri um, inflammation may involve the myometrium and
occasionally, the parametrium. The exfoliation of the endometrium provides a natural
scavenging effect which prevents endometrial infection from becoming established. Chronic
endometritis, characterized by an infiltrate of lymphocytes and plasma cells (often with an
additional minor component of eosinophils) [1] may follow pregnancy or abortion. Be the result
of an intrauterine device (IUD), be associated with a submucosal leiomyoma, or be accompanied
by mucop urulent cervicitis and/or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) [2, 3]. Patients suffering
from chronic endometritis may have an underlying cancer of cervix or endometrium. Pyometra
is usually met within elderly women and is one of the best -recognized forms of chronic
endometritis. The clinical term, senile endometritis, suggested a chronic infection of the
endometrium, usually low -grade [4]. CE is often asymptomatic or present with non – specific
clinical symptoms, such as pelvic pain, dysfunctional uterine bleeding, dyspareunia, vaginal
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology http://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 355 ~
discharge, vaginitis, recurrent cystitis and mild gastrointestinal
discomfort [5]. Current evidence suggested that chronic
endometritis is associated with infertility and poor reproductive
outcome [6]. Chronic endometritis c an affect up to a third of
infertile women. However, it can be the cause of repeated
implantation failure or recurrent pregnancy loss in many cases.
Chronic deciduitis was reported to be linked to preterm labor
(41%) [7, 8 ]. Chronic endometritis is often c linically silent.
Therefore, it is impossible to accurately determine its true
prevalence in the general population [9]. The prevalence of CE
ranges from 8% to 72% in women of reproductive age [10].
The most frequent causative agents for chronic endometrit is are
Infectious agents: Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, Mycoplasma,
Ureaplasma, Escherichia Coli, Streptococcus spp.,
Staphylococcus spp, Enterococcus faecalis, Yeast, and
Tuberculosis [11]. Specific infections agents causing endometritis
include herpesvirus, whic h may be associated with neonatal
infections [12] cytomegalovirus [13] which can also be an
associated with parental infections as well as spontaneous
abortions; toxoplasma [14] which can also be responsible for
spontaneous abortion; mycoplasma organisms [15] which are
suggested as a cause of infertility; and actinomycetes [16, 17]
frequently seen in women using intrauterine contraceptive
devices. For diagnosis of chronic endometritis - in blood Test
elevations in the peripheral white blood count and erythro cyte
sedimentation rate can be seen.
Histopathological diagnosis using H & E (Hematoxylin &
Eosin) staining is the gold standard for the diagnosis but it is
time-consuming and low diagnostic rate <10% [18, 19]. The
Presence of 1 -5 plasma cells/HPF of discr ete clusters of plasma
cells is generally accepted as the histological diagnostic criterion
for chronic endometritis.
TB endometritis is often focal. The demonstration of a typical
caseous granuloma with giant epithelioid cells is suggestive of
TB. Histopathological screening of patients by dilation and
curettage, though most accurate, is expensive, time -consuming
and involves hospitalization with complications of surgery and
hazards. An endometrial aspiration biopsy can be a useful
alternative to DNC. Asp iration cytology is better than
conventional D&C because in this procedure no cervical dilation
is required, it is cost -effective, it provides adequate tissue
samples, it can be done in an office setting, no anaesthesia is
required and diagnostic accuracy is 90-98%. Variety of devices
can be used for endometrial biopsy aspiration like Novak curette
VABRA curette Pipelle Device or gynosampler. The
histopathological diagnosis is usually available in 3-4 days.
TB endometritis is often focal, and pathological c hanges such as
ulceration, caseous nacreous and tuberculosis.
HPE of the specimens shows typical features of TB infection in
the form of granulomatous caseous lesions. The demonstration
of a typical caseous granuloma with giant epithelioid cells is
suggestive of TB.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with CD138 (syndecan – 1):
This method has higher sensitivity of 56% as compared to 13%
for H&E staining [19], it is more accurate [20].
It reduces the false -negative diagnosis [19] but this method is not
yet recommended in daily practice and not widely used for the
diagnosis of chronic endometritis.
Microbiological culture: Microbial culture (growing bacteria in
the lab) is the conventional method for identification of bacteria
and infection. However, it has been shown that between 20-60%
of bacteria cannot be cultured in the laboratory.
Microbial culture, the most reliable of the three classic methods,
has few limitations like contamination of the microbial culture
with skin or environmental bacteria: Usually remains Po sitive in
75% of histologically confirmed CE Commonly cultured
bacteria are Streptococcus agalactiae: 77.5%, Mycoplasma /
Ureaplasma: 25%, Chlamydia: 13% [11].
Ultrasound: TVS is better than abdominal Ultrasound. Indirect
sonography signs are - increase in endometrial thickness,
asynchronous with the phase of the menstrual cycle, Persistently
thin endometrium (Tuberculosis), Irregularity of the
endometrium, Endometrium with hyperechogenic spots
Intracavitary synechiae, Micropolyps, Fluid or debris
accumulated within the endometrial cavity. Hematometra,
Hypervascular endometrium in the secretory face, Sometimes
Calcification of entire endometrium can be seen [21, 22].
Hysteroscopic diagnosis: Hysteroscopy is a useful diagnostic
Procedure to detect endometriti s. It is usually done in the
follicular phase of the menstrual cycle Hysteroscopy is usually
done in the follicular phase (between D6 and 12) of the
menstrual cycle. Mucosal edema, Focal or diffuse endometrial
hyperemia or Micro Polyps can be seen [23]. Office Hysteroscopy
is having sensitivity 40%, specificity 80% (Bouet et al., 2016),
Accuracy of hysteroscopy was observed in 93.4% [24].
Molecular Diagnosis: Reverse- Reverse transcription -
polymerase chain reaction (RT -PCR) test can be used for the
molecular diagnosis of chronic endometritis.
NAAT- The nucleic -acid amplification tests (NAAT) provide
Results
in a few hours. PCR is a rapid molecular method.
Nowadays various tests are available to assess the health of the
endometrium. CRGH offers a comprehensive assessment of the
endometrium [25]. The quarter includes.
ERA (endometrial Receptivity Assay)
EMMA (Endometrial Microbiome Metagenomic Analysis)
ALICE (Analysis of infectious chronic Endometritis)
NKT (Natural Killer Test) (please refer to the section o n natural
killer cell test and immunotherapy
These tests are very useful in cases of recurrent implantation
failure.
Treatment: Generally, the drug of choice is doxycycline,
administered in doses of 100 mg every 12 hours for 14 days.
Alternatively, the ad ministration of cephalosporins, macrolides,
or quinolones is possible. Partner is advised to undergo the same
antibiotic treatment. If endometritis persists then endometrial
culture should be considered and appropriate antibiotic treatment
should be given. Women with cured endometritis showed a
higher pregnancy rate and live birth rate in comparison with
women with chronic endometritis [26].
In the presence of confirmed tuberculous (isoniazid, ethambutol,
rifampicin, and pyrazin amide for 2 months, followed by
isoniazid and rifampicin for another 4 months) should be given.
Aim of the study
The study aimed to find
1. The correlation of endometritis with various clinical
characteristics of the patients e.g. pelvic pain, dysfunctional
uterine bleeding, dyspareuni a, vaginal discharge, infertility,
recurrent miscarriage and amenorrhea.
2. To determine the various attributing etiological factors and
history e.g. its relation with PID, IUD, Postpartum factor,
Post abortal factors, postmenopausal, tubercular and
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology http://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 356 ~
idiopathic cause.
2. Material and method
The Inclusion Criteria for the study were those women
presenting with complaints of: Abnormal uterine bleeding,
abnormal vaginal discharge, Lower Abdominal pain,
Dysmenorrhoea, Dysparaaunia, Unable to conceive (Infertility ),
Recurrent miscarriage, Amenorrhea and backache.
The exclusion criteria were
A. Pregnant women
B. History and signs were suggestive of acute pelvic infection.
A retrospective study was done of the reports of Diagnosed
cases of chronic endometritis (Endometrial samples were
obtained by an office procedure in which aspiration by piipelle
forceps was done on the Outdoor examination table (without
need for cervical dilatation and anaesthesia and sent for the
histopathological examination (HPE)). The duration of the study
was from January 2016 to September 2020 at a private clinic and
a pathology centre of Shivpuri district. Total 360 reports of
endometrial aspiration were there, 7 reports were labelled as less
than optimal. So Out of 353 cases, 34 cases rep orted as
endometritis 34 histopathological reports were reviewed to
identify the cause of endometritis and its association with
clinical findings. Complete clinical history, age, residence,
parity, literacy, marital status, presenting symptoms and clinical
evaluation, ultrasound findings and all histopathological reports
of endometrial samples were analyzed.
Data were coded and entered into Microsoft Excel worksheet.
All the data was analyzed using IBM SPSS ver. 20 software.
Frequency distribution and cross tabulation was used to prepare
tables, data is expressed as percentage.
3. Result
1. Adequacy of Histopathological Samples
Adequacy of a sample obtained was reported by histopathologist
based on the amount of sample obtained as (a) unsatisfactory,
(b) less than optimal (c) satisfactory.
Graph 1: shows that out of 360 samples, 353 samples (98.05%) were satisfactory, seven cases (1.94%)
were less than optimal, and no case was reported as unsatisfactory.
2. Prevalence of endometritis
Fig 1: Prevalence of Chronic Endometritis- in our study Out of 353 cases 34 cases reported as
endometritis the prevalence of endometritis was 9.6%.
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology http://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 357 ~
3. Socio-demographic characteristics
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics A total of 34 cases were studied. The age of women ranges from 20 to 70 years. The maximum number
of patients was between 25-35 years. Most of the patients were rural (79.41%), most of them were married (97.06%) and (47.06%) cases were
multiparous
Age Group (years) No. of cases Total (%)
55 3 8.82%
Residence
Rural 27 79.41%
Urban 7 20.59%
Marital Status
Married 33 97.06%
Unmarried 1 2.94%
Parity
Nulliparous 6 17.65%
Primiparous 12 35.29%
Multiparous 16 47.06%
4. Principal presenting symptoms
Table 2: Principal presenting symptoms in 34 cases the most common
presenting complaint was (35.29%) abnormal uterine bleeding followed
by (17.65%) abnormal vaginal discharge, lower abdominal pain
(14.71%) and infertility (14.71 %)
Presenting symptom No. of
cases
Percentage
of cases
Abnormal uterine
bleeding
Intermenstrual Bleeding
12 35.29% Menorrhagia
Menometrorrhagia
Lower Abdominal pain 5 14.71%
Amenorrhoea 1 2.94%
Abnormal Vaginal discharge 6 17.65%
Dysmenorrhoea 1 2.94%
Dyspareunia 1 2.94%
Unable to conceive (Infertility) 5 14.71%
Recurrent miscarriage 3 8.82%
Total 34 100
5. Endometrial Findings on trans abdominal and Trans -
vaginal ultrasound scan
Table 3: Endometrial Findings on trans abdominal and Trans-vaginal
ultrasound scan- The most common finding on trans abdominal and
Trans-vaginal ultrasound scan was Thickened and Heterogeneous
endometrium, asynchronous with the phase of the menstrual cycle
(47.05%)
Finding on Ultrasound No. Percentage
Normal Endometrium 9 26.47%
Fluid or debris accumulated within the endometrial 3 8.82%
Persistently thin endometrium 3 8.82%
Thickened and Heterogeneous endometrium,
asynchronous with the phase of the menstrual cycle. 16 47.05%
Endometrium with hyperechogenic spots (Intracavitary
synechiae) 2 5.88%
Sometimes Calcification of entire endometrium 1 2.94%
Total 34 100
6. Histopathological finding and attributing specific Etiological factors
Table 4: Histopathological finding and Associated past history -The most common histopathological finding was chronic nonspecific endometritis.
In 58.82% cases, no significant past history was there, in 14.71% cases the history of instrumentation was there and in 8.82% cases history of IUD
insertion was there. 5.88% cases were postabortal, 2.94% were postpartum, 2.94% were postmenopausal with cervical stenosis and with
hematometra and 5.88% were Tubercular
Histopathological finding Significant history Number Percentage
Chronic nonspecific endometritis
No significant history only clinical finding 20 58.82%
history of instrumentation 5 14.71%
history of IUD insertion 3 8.82%
Post abortal 2 5.88%
Postpartum 1 2.94%
Post menopausal (Cervical stenosis with hematometra) 1 2.94%
Tubercular endometritis (Past History of Tuberculosis, History & clinical symptoms suggestive of Tuberculosis) 2 5.88%
Total 34 100
4. Discussion
Diagnosis of CE represents a challenge for the gynaecologist.
The clinical manifestatio ns of CE such as pelvic pain, vaginal
discharge, dyspareunia and abnormal vaginal bleeding are non –
specific, while about 25% of patients with CE are asymptomatic
[27].
A total of 34 cases were studied. The age of women ranges from
20 to 70 years.
In our study, the chronic endometritis was most common in 25 -
35 years of age which was not consistent with one another study
in which chronic endometritis was most common, 41.1% in 41 -
50 years of age [28].
In our study, most of the patient was multiparous (47.06% )
which was not consistent with one another study in which 80.5%
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology http://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 358 ~
multiparous 9.2% primiparous, and 10.3% nulliparous [28].
In our study chronic endometritis was found in 9.4% cases
which were lower than the study of Adegboyega PA et al. Who
reported 15.6% prevalence of endometritis [1]. And the
prevalence rate of chronic endometritis was consistent with
another study in which the prevalence rate of CE to be
approximately 10% to 11% based on biopsies of patients who
underwent hysterectomies due to benign gynecologic conditions [29].
In our study, the most common presenting complaint was
abnormal uterine bleeding (35.29%). Followed by (17.65%)
abnormal vaginal discharge, lower abdominal pain (14.71%) and
in our study infertility was in (14.71 %) and Recurrent
miscarriage was in 8.82% cases.
The most common symptoms were menstrual disturbances,
present in virtually every patient and pelvic pain or tenderness,
found in 50% of the women.
The abnormal vaginal bleeding was observed in a higher number
of patients th an another study in which Chronic endometritis is
observed in 3 -10% of women who undergo endometrial biopsy
for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) [30] and our study was
consistent with one another study in which abnormal vaginal
bleeding was the most common presenting symptom [28].
In Study of “Dana” overall prevalence rate of chronic
endometritis was 9% The prevalence in (REPL) recurrent early
pregnancy loss was 7% in FD (fetal death) group was 40% and
in combined (REPL) /FD group was 11% The cure rate was
100% after a course of antibiotic.
In the study of Fuminori Kimura [31] prevalence of chronic
endometritis was found to be 2.8 -56.8% infertile women, 14% -
67.5% in women recurrent implantation failure and 9.3% -
67.6% in women with recurrent pregnancy lo ss and found
antibiotic administration is an effective therapeutic option. The
prevalence of chronic endometritis in infertility 2.8% and 24.3%
by different authors [32].
The prevalence of chronic endometritis in RPL (Recurrent
pregnancy loss) was reporte d 43.0%, 52.0%, 8.9% by different
authors [33].
According to a recent prospective study of patients with RIF of
RPL, the CE prevalence rate in the RIF group was 14% (Six of
43) and 27% in the RPL group (14 of 51) [34] in our study there
was no data of RIF (recurrent implantation failure).
The most common finding on Trans abdominal and Trans -
vaginal ultrasound scan was Thickened and Heterogeneous
endometrium, asynchronous with the phase of the menstrual
cycle (47.05%) which was consistent with one another study.
The most common histopathological finding was chronic
nonspecific endometritis.
In 58.82% cases, no significant past history was there, history of
IUD insertion in 8.82% cases which was consistent with one
another study in which IUD insertion history was found in 11%
cases [31].
In our study 14.71% cases the history of instrumentation was
there, in 8.82% cases history of IUD insertion was there. 5.88%
cases were postabortal, 2.94% were postpartum, 2.94% were
postmenopausal with Cervical stenosis and with hematometra
and 5.88% were Tubercular.
In one another study Chronic endometritis could be attributed to
a specific etiologic factor in 84% of the patients: pelvic
inflammatory disease in 25%, intrauterine contraceptive device
in 14%, postpartum factor s in 12% and postabortal factors in
41% [35].
In a large 1978 review, 53 per cent of the cases of chronic non -
granulomatous endometritis were considered to be post -
infectious in origin (postpartum, postabortal, or associated with
intrauterine contraceptive devices or pelvic inflammatory
disease, 26 per cent were the result of stagnation, 4.5 per cent
were associated with carcinoma in situ of the cervix, and 16.5
per cent were idiopathic, although there was a high rate of oral
contraceptive usage among these idiopathic cases [1].
5. Conclusion
Chronic endometritis is a low -grade infection of the
endometrium. Most of the women remain asymptomatic.
Various risk factors like childbirth, miscarriage, caesarian
delivery, STDs; Pelvic procedures like D&C, Endometr ial
biopsy, hysteroscopy, and IUD insertion are the reason for the
uterus lining to be inflamed.
Untreated Chronic endometritis has been linked with fertility
issues, including an inability to conceive, recurrent implantation
failure (RIF) and spontaneous abortion and poor reproductive
outcome. Antibiotic treatment improves implantation rates and
decreases the rate of abortion and the poor reproductive outcome
so it is must to think about endometritis in such type of patient
and to treat it timely.
6. References
1. Adegboyega PA, Adegboyega PA, Pei Y, McLarty J.
Relationship between eosinophils and chronic endometritis.
Hum Pathol 2010;41:33-7.
2. Rotterdam H . Chronic endometritis. A clini copathologic
study. Pathol Annu 1978;13:209-231.
3. Paavonen J, Kiviat N, Sr unham RC, Stevens CE, Kuo CC ,
Stamm WE et al . Prevalence and manifestations of
endometritis among women with cervicitis A, J Obstet
Gynecol 1985;151:645-650.
4. Shaw's textbook of gynaecology; 10 th edition chapter 21
Inflammation of uterus 341-351.
5. Greenwood SM, Moran JJ. Chronic endometritis
morphologic and clinical observation. Obstet Gynecol
1981;58(2):176-184.
6. Kitaya et al . Yasuo T. immunohistochemistry and
clinicopathological characterization of chronic endometritis.
Am J Reprod Immunol 2011;66:410-415.
7. Kim CJ , Romero R , Chaemasithong P , Kim JS. Chronic
inflammation of the placenta: definition, classification,
pathogenesis, and clinical sig nificance. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 2015;213:s53-s63-s69.
8. Edmondson N, Edmondson N, Bocking A, Machin G, Rizek
R, Watson C. et al. The prevalence of chronic deciduitis in
cases of preterm labor without clinical chorio amnionitis.
Pediatr Dev Pathol 2009;12:16-21.
9. Farooki MA. Epidemiology and pathology of chronic
endometritis international surgery 1967;48:566-73.
10. Michels TC. Chronic endometritis. Am Fa m Physician
1995;52:217-22.
11. Cicinelli E, De Ziegler D, Nicoletti R, Colafigli G, Saliani
N et al . Chronic endometritis: Correlation among
hysteroscopic, histologic and bacteriologic findings in a
prospective trial with 2190 consecutive offic e
hysteroscopies. Fertil Steril 2014-2008;89:677-84.
12. Duncan DA, Vamer RE, Mazur MT . Uterine herpes virus
infection with multifocal necro tizing endometritis. Hum
Pathol 1989;20:1021-1024.
13. Frank TS, Himebaugh KS, Wilson MD . Granulomatous
endometritis associated with histologically occult
cytomegalovirus in a h ealthy patient Am J Surg Pathol
1992;16:716.
14. Stray-Pederson B, Lorentzen-Styr AM. Uterine toxoplasma
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology http://www.gynaecologyjournal.com
~ 359 ~
infections and repeated abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol
1977;128:716-721.
15. Taylor-Robinson D, McCormack WM . The genital
mycoplasma. N Engl Med 302:1003-1010, 1063-1067 1980.
16. Duguid HLD, Parratt D, Traynor R . Actinomyces-like
organisms in cervical smears from women using
intrauterine contraceptive devices. BMJ 1980;281:534.
17. Gupta PK . Intrauterine contraceptive devices. Vaginal
cytology, pathologic changes, and clinical implications.
Acta Cytol 1982;26:571.
18. Kasius et al., Authors Jenneke C Kasius, Human M Fatemi,
Claire Bourgain, Daisy MDS Sie -Go, Rene JC Eijkemans,
Bart C Fauser, Paul Devroey, Frank JM Brikemans Fertil
Steril 2011;96(6):145-6. doi 10. 1016.
19. McQueen DB, Bernardi LA, Stephenson MD. Chronic
endometritis in women with recurrent early pregnancy loss
and/or fetal demise. Fertil Steril 2014;101:1026-30.
20. Bayer-Garner IB, Nickell JA, Korourian S. Routine
Syndecan-1 immunohistochemistry aids in the diagnosis of
chronic endometritis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128:1000-
3.
21. Asim Kurjak, Frank A. Chervenak, Donald School
Textbook of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology;
Uterine Lesions: Advances in Ultrasound Diagnosis 840 -
857.
22. Fleischer, Manning, Jeanty, Romero, Sonography in
Obstetrics and Gynecology Principles & Practice; fifth
edition; Arthur C. Fleischer, Jeanne A, Cullinan, Howard
W. Jones, III; Transvaginal Sonograp hy of Endometrial
Disorders; Chapter 43, 867-885.
23. Cicinelli et al ., Cicinelli E, Resta L, Nicoletti R,
Zappimbulso V, Tartagni M, Saliani N. Endometrial
micropolyps at fluid hysteroscopy suggest the existence of
chronic endometritis. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1386-1389.
24. Cicinelli et al ., Cicinelli E, De Ziegler D, Nicoletti R,
Colafigli G, Saliani N, Resta L et al. Chronic endometritis:
correlation among hysteroscopic, histologic, and
bacteriologic findings in a prospective trial with 2190
consecutive office hyste roscopies. Fertil Steril 2008-
2010;89:677-84.
25. CRGH- Endometrial Health Assessments CRGH Fertility
clinic London IVF Clinic https://crgh.co.uk/endometrial -
health-assessments/
26. Cicinelli E, Matteo M, Tinelli R, Lepera A, Alfonso R,
Indraccolo U et al . Prevalence of chronic endometritis in
repeated unexplained implantation failure and the IVF
success rate after antibioti cs therapy. Human Reproduction
2015;30:323-30.
27. Romero R, Espinoza J, Mazor M. Can endometrial
infection/inflammation explain implantation fail ure,
spontaneous abortion, and preterm birth after in vitr o
fertilization? Fertil Steril 2004;82(40):799-804.
28. Kori Hagerty, Matthew Smith, Therese Vocklage Chronic
Endometritis Revisited A review of the Pathology and
clinical Finding. Undergraduate medical student research .
30.07.2008.
29. Polisseni F, Bambirra EA, Camargos AF. Detection of
chronic endometritis by diagnostic hysteroscopy in
asymptomatic infertile patients. Gynecol Obst et Invest
2003;55:205-210. [Pubmed][Google Scholar].
30. Vidyavathi Kannur, Harendra Kumar Lingaiah, Venigalla
Sunita. Date July -December Publisher Medknow
Publications and Media Pvt Ltd. Evaluation of
Endometrium for chronic Endometritis by using syndecan -1
in abnormal uterine Bleeding.
31. Fuminori Kimura Akle Takebayashi, Mitsukai Ishi da,
Akiko Nakamura, Jun Kitazawa Review chronic
endometritis and its effect on reproduction. Journal of
obstetrics and gynaecology research/volume 45, Issue 5
32. Kasius JC, Fatemi HM, Bourgain C, Sie-go DM, Eijkemans
RJ, Fauser BC et al. The impact of chronic endometritis on
reproductive outcome Fertility 2011;96:145-456.
33. Zolghadri. Cicinelli, McQueen, Jaleh Zolghandri et al. The
value of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of chronic
endometritis in patients with unexplained recurrent
spontaneous abortion. E ur J Ob stet Gynecol Reprod Biol
2011-2014.
34. Bouet PE - EI Hachem H, Monceau E, Gariepy G, Kadoch
IJ, Sylvestre C. Chronic endometritis in women with
recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure:
prevalence and role of office hysteroscopy and
immunohistochemistry in diagnosis. Fertil Steril
2016;105:106-110.
35. Dario Cadena MD, Francisco J , Cavanso MD, Cheryl L ,
Leone MD, Herbert B. Taylor, MD Chronic endometritis A
comparative clinicopathologic study. Obstetrics &
gynecology may 1973, 733-738.