Retraction: Endometriosis and pregnancy: The illusion of recovery
PLOS One Editors retracted this article due to concerns about compromised peer review, though authors did not agree with the retraction and there was no evidence of author involvement in the compromised review.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This PLOS One Editors retraction addresses the article “Endometriosis and pregnancy: The illusion of recovery,” retracting it because it was identified as part of a set of submissions with concerns about compromised peer review. The editors state they have no evidence of author involvement in those peer review concerns. The retraction also notes that not all authors agreed with the retraction. This paper is centrally about endometriosis—specifically it is a retraction covering a study titled “Endometriosis and pregnancy: The illusion of recovery.”
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
786 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (1)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-12T06:13:51.797165+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pmc
- last seen: 2026-05-13T20:22:03.195721+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-06-12T06:09:51.019110+00:00