The role of HE4 and CA125 in differentiation between malignant and non-malignant endometrial pathologies
Serum HE4 levels were significantly higher in patients with endometrial cancer and reliably differentiated malignant from non-malignant pathologies, unlike CA125.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective study evaluated serum HE4 and CA125 as biomarkers to differentiate malignant from non-malignant endometrial pathologies in 87 patients, with tumor marker levels measured about two weeks before surgical intervention and final diagnoses based on endometrial histopathology. HE4 was significantly higher in endometrial cancer overall and in early stages compared with non-malignant conditions, and its diagnostic performance at a 70 pmol/L cutoff showed sensitivity of 73.08% and specificity of 85.71% with an AUC of 0.875; CA125 did not meaningfully distinguish malignant from non-malignant pathologies (AUC 0.552, p = 0.414). The main limitation explicitly inherent to the study is its retrospective design. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via keyword overlap with gynecologic pathology and malignant/non-malignant differentiation.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,948 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Material and methods
Results
Conclusion
Keywords
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
Cited by (1)
References (26)
- Risk of endometrial polyps in women with endometriosis: a meta-analysis via openalex
- doi:10.1172/jci110380 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.04.002 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s13046-015-0208-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.cca.2014.11.013 via openalex
- doi:10.1373/clinchem.2010.157073 via openalex
- doi:10.1006/gyno.2002.6664 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s13277-012-0583-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.109 via openalex
- W163983425 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s13277-010-0049-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s13053-015-0025-2 via openalex
- doi:10.17772/gp/2070 via openalex
- doi:10.1095/biolreprod45.2.350 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.yobg.2011.06.054 via openalex
- doi:10.3390/ijms14036026 via openalex
- doi:10.1155/2015/437468 via openalex
- doi:10.3892/ol.2012.654 via openalex
- W2177316499 via openalex
- doi:10.4238/2015.march.27.2 via openalex
- W2417821092 via openalex
- W3151241602 via openalex
- doi:10.1515/cclm-2011-0757 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1090-798x(09)79138-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.10.025 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.05.038 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:58:56.137231+00:00