The role of HE4 and CA125 in differentiation between malignant and non-malignant endometrial pathologies
article
OA: gold
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess the role of HE4 and CA125 in differentiation between malignant and non-malignant endometrial pathologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 87 patients with endometrial pathologies was conducted. Tumor markers were assessed two weeks before surgical intervention in each subject. The final diagnosis was established on the basis of the histopathological examination of the endometrium. RESULTS: Serum HE4 levels were significantly higher in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) as compared to non-malignant endometrial pathologies (p < 0.001), patients with stage I EC as compared to non-malignant endometrial pathologies (p < 0.001), and patients with stage Ia EC as compared to non-malignant endometrial pathologies (p = 0.003). Serum CA125 levels were not significantly different as far as these groups of patients were concerned. Both tumor markers were significantly higher in patients with stage II-III as compared to stage I EC and non-malignant endometrial pathologies (p < 0.001 for both markers). Sensitivity and specificity of HE4 at the cut-off level of 70 pmol/L for detecting endometrial malignancies were 73.08% and 85.71%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of CA125 at the cut-off level of 35 U/mL were 29.41% and 94.29%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for HE4 was 0.875, suggesting that this marker reliably differentiates malignant from non-malignant endometrial pathologies (p < 0.001). AUC for CA125 was 0.552, suggesting that this marker does not reliably differentiate between malignant and non-malignant endometrial pathologies (p = 0.414). CONCLUSION: HE4, in contrast to CA125, might be a useful tool for detecting malignant endometrial pathologies.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
Cited by (1)
References (26)
- Risk of endometrial polyps in women with endometriosis: a meta-analysis via openalex
- doi:10.1172/jci110380 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.04.002 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s13046-015-0208-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.cca.2014.11.013 via openalex
- doi:10.1373/clinchem.2010.157073 via openalex
- doi:10.1006/gyno.2002.6664 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s13277-012-0583-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.109 via openalex
- W163983425 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s13277-010-0049-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s13053-015-0025-2 via openalex
- doi:10.17772/gp/2070 via openalex
- doi:10.1095/biolreprod45.2.350 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.yobg.2011.06.054 via openalex
- doi:10.3390/ijms14036026 via openalex
- doi:10.1155/2015/437468 via openalex
- doi:10.3892/ol.2012.654 via openalex
- W2177316499 via openalex
- doi:10.4238/2015.march.27.2 via openalex
- W2417821092 via openalex
- W3151241602 via openalex
- doi:10.1515/cclm-2011-0757 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1090-798x(09)79138-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.10.025 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.05.038 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:58:56.137231+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK