The impact of embolization endpoints on the efficacy of uterine artery embolization for adenomyosis

article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This study found that the delayed embolization endpoint in uterine artery embolization for adenomyosis resulted in greater symptom relief compared to the standard endpoint, with no significant differences in other clinical outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess how embolization endpoints affect the efficacy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for adenomyosis. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients treated with UAE from 2014-2018 received the standard embolization endpoint (SEE), while those from 2019-2022 received the delayed embolization endpoint (DEE). Clinical outcomes, including embolic microsphere volume, uterine volume, CA125 levels, hemoglobin, menstrual flow, dysmenorrhea, and postoperative complications, were compared between the groups. RESULTS: At six months post-procedure, all patients showed significant improvement in clinical indicators (p < 0.01). Group DEE used significantly more embolic microspheres than Group SEE (p < 0.01) and achieved greater reductions in CA125, menstrual volume, and dysmenorrhea (p  0.05). CONCLUSIONS: UAE is a safe and effective treatment for adenomyosis. Compared to the standard approach, the delayed embolization endpoint provides superior symptom relief and warrants broader clinical adoption.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Outcome instruments

VAS-pain

Condition tags

dysmenorrheaadenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (29)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:16:12.914779+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK