Comparison between standard and reverse laparoscopic techniques for rectovaginal endometriosis

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 30 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-21

This study compared standard and reverse laparoscopic techniques for rectovaginal endometriosis, finding the reverse technique significantly reduced major postoperative complications.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-21 · read from full text

This retrospective tertiary-center study compared surgical outcomes of standard versus reverse laparoscopic techniques in 75 women with rectovaginal endometriosis requiring both vaginal resection and rectal surgery (35 standard, 40 reverse). Across groups, there were no statistically significant differences in operating time, blood loss, conversion rate, major intraoperative complications, length of hospital stay, or minor postoperative complications, and postoperative rectovaginal fistula rates were the same. However, major postoperative complications were lower with the reverse technique (5%) than with the standard technique (22.9%; p = 0.02). The key limitation is the retrospective, nonrandomized design, which may introduce selection and other bias. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it directly compares laparoscopic approaches for rectovaginal endometriosis with reported perioperative complication outcomes.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BackgroundThis study was designed to compare the surgical outcomes of standard and reverse laparoscopic techniques for the treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in a teaching and research hospital (tertiary center), which included 75 women subjected to laparoscopic treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis that required both vaginal resection and rectal surgery. Standard and reverse laparoscopic techniques were compared in 35 and 40 women, respectively. Student's t test, Mann-Whitney test, and Fisher's exact test were performed to compare groups when needed; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in operating time, blood loss, conversion rate, major intraoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and minor postoperative complications between the two techniques. The rate of major postoperative complications for the standard technique was 22.9%, whereas only 5% for the reverse technique (p = 0.02). The rate of postoperative rectovaginal fistula was the same for both techniques.ConclusionsMajor postoperative complications were reduced by using the reverse technique.
Full text 7,684 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background This study was designed to compare the surgical outcomes of standard and reverse laparoscopic techniques for the treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted in a teaching and research hospital (tertiary center), which included 75 women subjected to laparoscopic treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis that required both vaginal resection and rectal surgery. Standard and reverse laparoscopic techniques were compared in 35 and 40 women, respectively. Student’s t test, Mann–Whitney test, and Fisher’s exact test were performed to compare groups when needed; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in operating time, blood loss, conversion rate, major intraoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and minor postoperative complications between the two techniques. The rate of major postoperative complications for the standard technique was 22.9%, whereas only 5% for the reverse technique (p = 0.02). The rate of postoperative rectovaginal fistula was the same for both techniques.

Conclusions

Major postoperative complications were reduced by using the reverse technique. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Carmona F, Martínez-Zamora A, González X, Ginés A, Buñesch L, Balasch J (2009) Does the learning curve of conservative laparoscopic surgery in women with rectovaginal endometriosis impair the recurrence rate? Fertil Steril 92:868–875 Kristensen J, Kjer JJ (2007) Laparoscopic laser resection of rectovaginal pouch and rectovaginal septum endometriosis: the impact on pelvic pain and quality of life. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86:1467–1471 Vercellini P, Crosignani PG, Somigliana E, Berlanda N, Barbara G, Fedele L (2009) Medical treatment for rectovaginal endometriosis: what is the evidence? Hum Reprod 24:2504–2514 Slack A, Child T, Lindsey I, Kennedy S, Cunningham C, Mortensen N, Koninckx P, McVeigh E (2007) Urological and colorectal complications following surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis. BJOG 114:1278–1282 Maytham G, Dowson H, Levy B, Kent A, Rockall T (2010) Laparoscopic excision of rectovaginal endometriosis: report of a prospective study and review of the literature. Colorectal Dis 12(11):1105–1112 Matsuzaki S, Houlle C, Botchorishvili R, Pouly JL, Mage G, Canis M (2009) Excision of the posterior vaginal fornix is necessary to ensure complete resection of rectovaginal endometriotic nodules of more than 2 cm in size. Fertil Steril 91:1314–1315 Darai E, Thomassin I, Barranger E, Detchev R, Cortez A, Houry S, Bazot M (2005) Feasibility and clinical outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:394–400 Darai E, Ackerman G, Bazot M, Rouzier R, Dubernard G (2007) Laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis: limits and complications. Surg Endosc 21:1572–1577 Benbara A, Fortin A, Martin B, Palazzo L, Le Tohic A, Madelenat P, Yazbeck C (2008) Surgical and functional results of rectosigmoidal resection for severe endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 36:1191–1201 Ferrero S, Anserini P, Abbamonte LH, Ragni N, Camerini G, Remorgida V (2009) Fertility after bowel resection for endometriosis. Fertil Steril 92:41–46 Mohr C, Nezhat FR, Nezhat CH, Seidman DS, Nezhat CR (2005) Fertility considerations in laparoscopic treatment of infiltrative bowel endometriosis. JSLS 9:16–24 Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213 Cornillie FJ, Oosterlynck D, Lauweryns JM, Koninckx PR (1990) Deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis: histology and clinical significance. Fertil Steril 53:978–983 Koninckx PR, Martin DC (1992) Deep endometriosis: a consequence of infiltration or retraction or possibly adenomyosis externa? Fertil Steril 58:924–928 Vercellini P, Frontino G, Pietropaolo G, Gattei U, Daguati R, Crosignani PG (2004) Deep endometriosis: definition, pathogenesis, and clinical management. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11:153–161 Wright JT (2000) The diagnosis and management of infiltrating nodular recto-vaginal endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 12:283–287 Kwok A, Lam A, Ford R (2001) Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: implications, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol Surv 56:168–177 Jacobson TZ, Barlow DH, Garry R, Koninckx P (2001) Laparoscopic surgery for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001300 Chapron C, Jacob S, Dubuisson JB, Vieira M, Liaras E, Fauconnier A (2001) Laparoscopically assisted vaginal management of deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectovaginal septum. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:349–354 Mangler M, Loddenkemper C, Lanowska M, Bartley J, Schneider A, Köhler C (2008) Histopathology-based combined surgical approach to rectovaginal endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 103:59–64 Ruffo G, Scopelliti F, Scioscia M, Ceccaroni M, Mainardi P, Minelli L (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: analysis of 436 cases. Surg Endosc 24:63–67 Koh CH, Janik GM (2002) The surgical management of deep rectovaginal endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:357–364 Redwine DB (1991) Conservative laparoscopic excision of endometriosis by sharp dissection: life table analysis of reoperation and persistent or recurrent disease. Fertil Steril 56:628–634 Fedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G, Bettoni G, Gotsch F (2004) Long-term follow-up after conservative surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:1020–1024 Ford J, English J, Miles WA, Giannopoulos T (2004) Pain, quality of life and complications following the radical resection of rectovaginal endometriosis. BJOG 111:353–356 Burke P, Mealy K, Gillen P, Joyce W, Traynor O, Hyland J (1994) Requirement for bowel preparation in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 81:907–910 Miettinen RP, Laitinen ST, Mäkelä JT, Pääkkönen ME (2000) Bowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution vs. no preparation in elective open colorectal surgery: prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:669–675 Muzii L, Angioli R, Zullo MA, Calcagno M, Panici PB (2003) Bowel preparation for gynecological surgery. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 48:311–315 Santos JC Jr, Batista J, Sirimarco MT, Guimarães AS, Levy CE (1994) Prospective randomized trial of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 81:1673–1676 Platell C, Hall J (1998) What is the role of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing colorectal surgery? Dis Colon Rectum 41:875–882 Possover M, Diebolder H, Plaul K, Schneider A (2000) Laparoscopically assisted vaginal resection of rectovaginal endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 96:304–307 Hollett-Caines J, Vilos GA, Penava DA (2003) Laparoscopic mobilization of the rectosigmoid and excision of the obliterated cul-de-sac. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10:190–194 Disclosures William Kondo, Nicolas Bourdel, Kris Jardon, Stefano Tamburro, Daniele Cavoli, Sachiko Matsuzaki, Revaz Botchorishvili, Benoit Rabischong, Jean L. Pouly, Gérard Mage, Michel Canis have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Kondo, W., Bourdel, N., Jardon, K. et al. Comparison between standard and reverse laparoscopic techniques for rectovaginal endometriosis. Surg Endosc 25, 2711–2717 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1635-z Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1635-z

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisbowel_endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Laparoscopy Rectal Diseases Vaginal Diseases Adult Endometriosis Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Humans Laparoscopy Rectal Diseases Rectal Diseases Retrospective Studies Vaginal Diseases Vaginal Diseases

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (34)

Cited by (30)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-29T06:27:48.050232+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:16:48.482574+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-29T07:08:50.896093+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK