Social networks and influencers as the main source of 'scientific' information on endometriosis: a medical class hara-kiri?

Human Reproduction · 2024 · vol. 39(4) , pp. 856–857 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deae036 · PMID:38423532
other OA: bronze public-domain-us
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This paper investigates social networks and influencers as primary sources of endometriosis information, questioning the medical community's role in disseminating accurate knowledge.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-22T06:15:23.361955+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-22T06:13:41.365644+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine