Preretrieval predictors of pregnancy in IVF
Observational
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
In IVF patients with tubal factor infertility, lower serum estradiol and shorter gonadotropin duration predicted higher pregnancy rates, whereas these factors were associated with decreased pregnancy probability in women with other or mixed diagnoses.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the predictive value of preretrieval parameters of ovarian stimulation in patients undergoing IVF-ET.
METHODS: Women diagnosed with infertility due to tubal factor were compared to women with other and/or multiple diagnoses. Stepwise logistic regression evaluated 389 cycles to identify the best predictors of pregnancy among the following variables: age, primary or secondary infertility, cycle number, type and dose of gonadotropin, duration of gonadotropin administration, serum estradiol level, and number and size of follicles.
RESULTS: In the tubal disease group, probability of pregnancy was greater in cycles with serum estradiol levels below 1100 pg/ml on the day of hCG (odds ratio, 4.7) and with administration of gonadotropins for less than 10 days (odds ratio, 3.7). In contrast, in the other/mixed diagnoses group, a serum estradiol below 1100 pg/ml was associated with a decreased probability of pregnancy (odds ratio, 0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Optimal parameters of ovarian stimulation may vary according to the etiology of infertility. In patients with tubal disease, the beneficial effects of greater stimulation, and thus the greater number of available oocytes, may be offset by adverse effects on the endometrium and on the quality of oocytes and embryos. In contrast, in other diagnostic groups, the advantage of an increased number of oocytes may outweigh the potential adverse effects of prolonged stimulation and higher estradiol levels.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-25T09:32:14.900964+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T22:00:16.042305+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-30T06:30:42.975179+00:00