The use of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate in contraception and its potential impact on skeletal health
review
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This paper reviews the use of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception and discusses its potential effects on bone mineral density.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
BackgroundIn the fall of 2007, the controversy about the contraceptive use of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and its potential impact on skeletal health reached the media in the province of Quebec, Canada, thereby becoming a matter of concern for the lay public and physicians. In order to discuss this subject openly, the National Institute of Public Health of Quebec (INSPQ) organized a scientific meeting on February 15, 2008, with targeted physicians delegated by their medical associations in the fields of general practice, obstetrics and gynaecology, rheumatology, orthopaedic surgery, physiatry and endocrinology.Study designParticipants reviewed the scientific literature using the study classification method according to the level of evidence, reviewed published guidelines of medical societies and organizations on the subject and reached a consensus position. This manuscript presents a review of the literature and describes the consensus position of the targeted medical associations.ResultsThe consensus position adopted by all the targeted medical associations determined that DMPA was a cost-effective contraceptive option that must be considered in the light of the clinical situation and preference of each woman. Candidates for injectable contraception should be informed that the use of DMPA is associated with a slight decrease in bone mineral density (BMD), which is largely, if not completely, reversible. There should not be an absolute limit to the length of time that the DMPA contraceptive is used, regardless of the woman's age. Monitoring BMD is not recommended among users of DMPA for contraceptive purposes. Finally, the consensus statement declared that, although supplements of calcium and vitamin D are beneficial for skeletal health for women in general, such supplementation should not be recommended solely based on a woman's use of DMPA.ConclusionGiven the scientific evidences, DMPA use remains a valid contraceptive option for women. Its potential impact on BMD must be balanced against the significant individual, familial and social consequences of unintended pregnancy.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (4)
- ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis 2005
- Subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain 2005
- Subcutaneous injection of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate compared with leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain 2006
- Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain 2005
Cited by (3)
References (100)
- Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain via openalex
- ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis via openalex
- Subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain via openalex
- Subcutaneous injection of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate compared with leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00311-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00001648-200209000-00015 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1254 via openalex
- doi:10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.1.129 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0010-7824(91)90106-p via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00275-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/archpedi.158.7.650 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2005.05.011 via openalex
- doi:10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.5.893 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.01.007 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32125-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006250-200606000-00055 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.070 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650100517 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejm199503233321202 via openalex
- doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.1998.00582.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0378-5122(93)90122-x via openalex
- doi:10.1067/mob.2002.122420 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/00016470510030274 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.04.003 via openalex
- W16439720 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/ajcn/80.5.1322 via openalex
- W128531299 via openalex
- W159203288 via openalex
- W213236141 via openalex
- W313451337 via openalex
- W1416341669 via openalex
- doi:10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.4.633 via openalex
- W1907235146 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s001980070050 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30363-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/jcem.81.6.8964870 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/jc.2002-020874 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.010 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2005.12.010 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00294-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s001980170033 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.041 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/ajcn/67.4.693 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0020-7292(01)00583-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s001980170048 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00236-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4242-8_10 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650101125 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/0032472031000147116 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.03.011 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500240074029 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/ajcn/65.6.1738 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0169-6009(91)90092-e via openalex
- doi:10.1007/bf01623940 via openalex
- doi:10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.3.581 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30993-8 via openalex
- doi:10.7202/005207ar via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00571.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.cct.2007.07.007 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00198-005-0029-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0378-5122(01)00296-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s001980050211 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2003.tb10431.x via openalex
- doi:10.1210/jcem.80.9.7673413 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00198-003-1552-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.3.557 via openalex
- doi:10.1503/cmaj.100771 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00369-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1055/s-2007-1003262 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/aje/153.12.1166 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30377-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1042/cs0940405 via openalex
- doi:10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.6.993 via openalex
- W2198271647 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/jc.81.6.2314 via openalex
- W2531635076 via openalex
- W2732353950 via openalex
- W3143205803 via openalex
- doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000057828.04231.16 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.10.005 via openalex
- W4298100012 via openalex
- W6600677336 via openalex
- W6606430310 via openalex
- W6608606253 via openalex
- W6610993489 via openalex
- doi:10.1385/jcd:7:1:51 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114384 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01748-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/jc.80.9.2709 via openalex
- doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000030940.73167.4e via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0049-0172(00)80011-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.11.1761 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006254-200202000-00022 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00041-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.269.24.3130 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(12)91813-x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00042192-200512020-00005 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.08.010 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0020-7292(98)00155-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0378-5122(94)00878-b via openalex
Cited by (3)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:15:24.675520+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-06T06:31:40.515551+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK