Comparison of double blastocyst transfer versus sequential transfer on pregnancy outcomes in individuals with frozen embryo transfer and a history of recurrent implantation failure: An RCT
Sequential single cleavage-stage and blastocyst transfer did not significantly improve pregnancy or implantation outcomes compared to double blastocyst transfer in women with recurrent implantation failure.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This randomized clinical trial compared double blastocyst transfer against sequential single cleavage-stage and blastocyst transfer in women under 45 with a history of recurrent implantation failure. The study found no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding chemical pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rates, early miscarriage, multiple gestation, or implantation rates. Although the authors note that some prior literature suggests benefits for sequential transfer, their data indicate comparable efficacy for both strategies in this specific patient population. Relevance to endometriosis: uterine adenomyosis is listed as an exclusion criterion for participants, but the paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
20,097 characters
· extracted from
pmc-nxml
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Section
Coi Statement
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-04T09:26:46.659050+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:50:50.276477+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T02:00:01.467718+00:00