Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for endometriosis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol

other OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a common disease of women of childbearing age. In recent years, the incidence of endometriosis has been on the rise. The main clinical manifestations are pelvic pain and infertility. In recent years, traditional Chinese patent medicine (TCMP) has played an important role in the treatment of endometriosis. So far, there is a lack of comparison among all the current common TCPMs for endometriosis. Consequently, it is indispensable to propose a network meta-analysis (NMA) protocol to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of different TCMPs. METHODS: We will comprehensively and systematically retrieve the relevant Chinese and English databases from their inceptions to the May 2019. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TCMPs for Endometriosis will be included. Two researchers will independently screen literature, extract data and assess the risk of bias of included studies. We will conduct pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian network meta-analyses to assess all the available evidence. Data will be analyzed using STATA and WinBUGS software. RESULTS: This work will compare and rank the relative efficacy of different TCPMs in the treatment of endometriosis in detail. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will provide reliable evidence for the selection of clinical treatment program and guideline development. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019127781.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_paininfertility

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Medicine, Chinese Traditional Medicine, Chinese Traditional Bayes Theorem Female Humans Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Network Meta-Analysis as Topic Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Research Design Systematic Reviews as Topic

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-14T06:08:20.186862+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:22:41.077124+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine