Power morcellation for women undergoing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy - safety of procedure and clinical experience from 426 cases
This study analyzed 426 laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies with power morcellation and found an unexpected malignancy rate of 0.9%, primarily endometrial carcinomas.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective study analyzed clinical data from 426 consecutive women who underwent laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with power morcellation for presumed benign indications between 2011 and 2015, including symptomatic uterine fibromas, abnormal uterine bleeding, and suspicion of uterine adenomyosis, while excluding cases with premalignant or malignant preoperative findings in the cervix and uterine corpus. Unexpected malignancies were identified in 4 patients (0.9%), consisting of one ovarian cancer and three endometrial carcinomas, and all required abdominal reoperations; histology of the removed cervix and adnexa showed no abnormalities. The authors conclude that unintended endometrial carcinoma incidence after morcellation was relatively small, with a stated caveat emphasizing careful preoperative counseling to rule out malignancy. Relevance to endometriosis and adenomyosis: the cohort included women with suspicion of uterine adenomyosis (8.9%), making it directly relevant to adenomyosis while evaluating cancer safety after power morcellation in a broader gynecologic context.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,666 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Material and methods
Results
Conclusions
Keywords
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-22T06:15:23.361955+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:20:54.390225+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine