Gynaecological care of women with chronic pelvic pain: Patient perspectives and care preferences
Women with chronic pelvic pain report delayed diagnosis and clinician dismissals, emphasizing the need for trauma-informed care and improved communication during gynaecological appointments.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (24)
- A cognitive behavioural based assessment of women with chronic pelvic pain via crossref
- A comparative study of women with chronic pelvic pain, chronic nonpelvic pain and those with no history of pain attending general practitioners via crossref
- An interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program effectively treats impairment in sexual function, depression, alexithymia, and pain in women with chronic pelvic pain via crossref
- Attributes and Barriers to Care of Pelvic Pain in University Women via crossref
- Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women via crossref
- History of abuse and its relationship to pain experience and depression in women with chronic pelvic pain via crossref
- Predictors of outcome in a cohort of women with chronic pelvic pain – A follow‐up study via crossref
- Prevalence of Chronic Pelvic Pain AmongWomen: An Updated Review via crossref
- The development and delivery of a female chronic pelvic pain management programme: a specialised interdisciplinary approach via crossref
- Trauma and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Women With Chronic Pelvic Pain via crossref
- doi:10.1300/j229v07n03_04 via crossref
- doi:10.2307/798843 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01072-3 via crossref
- doi:10.7205/milmed-d-16-00393 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002956 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31822c994d via crossref
- doi:10.1001/archfami.9.5.451 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/ser0000315 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e318249ff74 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/milmed/usy361 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/a0037564 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/jts.21778 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000004326 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0883-9417(93)90043-v via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-07-01T06:30:54.479486+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-07-29T06:27:48.050232+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-07-29T06:27:23.422427+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-07-29T07:08:50.896093+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine