Sperm retrieval, fertilization, and pregnancy outcome in repeated testicular sperm aspiration.
Repeated testicular sperm aspiration up to six times yielded sufficient motile sperm for ICSI and maintained fertilization and pregnancy rates without complications.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective study evaluated sperm retrieval outcomes and pregnancy results after up to six repeated testicular sperm aspiration procedures in men with obstructive (22 men; 50 aspirations) or nonobstructive azoospermia (34 men; 91 aspirations), with outcomes including sperm sufficiency for ICSI, cryopreservation, fertilization rates, and pregnancy outcomes. The authors found no major differences in sperm recovery or pregnancy outcome across repeated cycles, and in the nonobstructive group they obtained testicular aspirates containing motile spermatozoa with preserved fertilizing capacity in up to six procedures. No postoperative complications were reported. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
7,116 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusions
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (27)
- doi:10.1007/bf01131497 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0140-6736(92)92425-f via crossref
- doi:10.1071/rd9950281 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/12.9.1974 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019249 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56754-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135969 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92792-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136142 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/14.1.118 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/12.7.1488 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/12.1.80 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/12.8.1688 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/13.12.3390 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/13.10.2805 via crossref
- doi:10.1071/rd9950263 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019004 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/14.7.1785 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/13.5.1266 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/13.11.3075 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/14.1.131 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65473-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/13.3.646 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/14.5.1274 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00154-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/12.11.2422 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/13.11.3081 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-05-22T01:00:13.353217+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-07T06:07:27.085738+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-07T06:39:35.550527+00:00