What Can We Count On? Performance of Microplate Cell Counting Assays in 2D Monolayer and 3D ECM-based In Vitro Tumour Models
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Accurate cell counting is essential in tissue engineering and cancer research. The ongoing transition towards advanced 3D in vitro tumour models raises a question about the validity of the standard cell counting protocols, particularly in the systems containing extracellular matrix-based scaffolds. Here, we provide a quantitative analysis of the performance of three popular plate reader-based cell counting/viability assays, such as the Alamar Blue, MTT, CellTiter Glo 3D assays, in 2D monolayer and 3D scaffold-based cultures of U251 human glioblastoma cells, including cell-laden Matrigel plugs, and original tissue engineering constructs based on the decellularised sheep brain scaffolds. We quantitatively characterized the assays’ linearity, precision, biological and technical reproducibility, proportionality, and inter-assay agreement. The study revealed that assays’ performance is highly platform-dependent, with 2D cultures allowing significantly more precise and reliable measurements than in 3D ECM scaffold-based cultures. The numerical results provided in this study can help researchers make informed decisions when working with 3D scaffold-based in vitro tumour models and for other tissue engineering purposes where precise cell counting is essential. ToC
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00