Evaluating Evo 2 for plant variant effect prediction

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The genomic foundation model Evo 2 enables zero-shot variant effect prediction. Here, we evaluate its performance using Arabidopsis thaliana reproductive barrier genes with experimentally confirmed gain- and loss-of-function variants, and show that Evo 2 distinguishes functionally impactful variants. Together with a sign-reversal amplitude metric that recovers a variant missed by standard scoring, these results highlight the potential of Evo 2 for causal variant prioritization in plant GWAS and QTL mapping.
Full text 1,104 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The genomic foundation model Evo 2 enables zero-shot variant effect prediction. Here, we evaluate its performance using Arabidopsis thaliana reproductive barrier genes with experimentally confirmed gain- and loss-of-function variants, and show that Evo 2 distinguishes functionally impactful variants. Together with a sign-reversal amplitude metric that recovers a variant missed by standard scoring, these results highlight the potential of Evo 2 for causal variant prioritization in plant GWAS and QTL mapping. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funder Information Declared Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, https://ror.org/048rj2z13, 22H05174, 21H05030, 24K01692, 23K17987, 23K14207 Suntory Foundation for Life Sciences, https://ror.org/02pkrz957, Suntory Rising Stars Encouragement Program in Life Sciences Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00