Comparison of Electrocauterization and Cryosurgery for the Treatment of Benign Disease of the Uterine Cervix

Donald R. Ostergard; Duane E. Townsend; Frank M. Hirose

doi:10.1097/00006250-196901000-00010

Comparison of Electrocauterization and Cryosurgery for the Treatment of Benign Disease of the Uterine Cervix

Donald R. Ostergard, Duane E. Townsend, Frank M. Hirose

In: Obstetrics & Gynecology · 1969 · vol. 33(1) , pp. 58–63 · doi:10.1097/00006250-196901000-00010 · PMID:5773872 · W2021510431

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation

View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-27 ⓘ

This paper compares electrocauterization and cryosurgery for treating benign disease of the uterine cervix, without addressing endometriosis or adenomyosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Comparison of Electrocauterization and Cryosurgery for the Treatment of Benign Disease of the Uterine Cervix: PDF Only

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

Cryosurgery of Benign Cervical Lesions as an Out‐Patient Procedure 1978

Cited by (1)

Cryosurgery of Benign Cervical Lesions as an Out‐Patient Procedure 1978

Source provenance

openalex: last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00

License: CC0 · commercial use OK