Barriers and opportunities to preventing residential bird-window collisions

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Collisions with windows are a leading source of avian mortality in North America. Window treatment options are commercially available; however, these solutions are rarely used. To investigate knowledge and perceptions of bird-window collisions, willingness to treat windows, and barriers and solutions to treating windows we conducted a survey of residents in Ottawa, Canada. Of 422 survey respondents, 90.7% had previously heard of bird-window collisions, 58.5% had previously observed a collision, 88.0% consider collisions with windows to be an issue in Ottawa, and 87.0% were willing to treat their windows. For all survey respondents, the top barriers reducing willingness to treat windows included the perception that birds infrequently or never collide with windows (parameter estimate ± standard error, PE ± SE = -1.29 ± 0.54, p = 0.02), aesthetics (PE ± SE = -0.77 ± 0.31, p = 0.01), and wanting a clear view from windows (PE ± SE = -0.88 ± 0.25, p < 0.01). For those willing to treat their windows, lack of time was the most identified barrier (38.2%), while for those unwilling to treat their windows, the need for more evidence that bird-window collisions require action was most identified (49.1%). Top potential solutions were provision of free materials, aesthetically pleasing materials, and clear instructions. Our results suggest that Ottawa residents are generally willing to treat their windows at home and we identify key barriers between willingness and implementation. To encourage bird-friendly window treatment at a wider scale, we suggest targeted messaging highlighting the impact of low-rise housing in driving the problem and the solution to bird-window collisions. Our results also highlight the opportunity for advocacy groups to aid residents in overcoming practical barriers to treating their windows.
Full text 2,340 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Collisions with windows are a leading source of avian mortality in North America. Window treatment options are commercially available; however, these solutions are rarely used. To investigate knowledge and perceptions of bird-window collisions, willingness to treat windows, and barriers and solutions to treating windows we conducted a survey of residents in Ottawa, Canada. Of 422 survey respondents, 90.7% had previously heard of bird-window collisions, 58.5% had previously observed a collision, 88.0% consider collisions with windows to be an issue in Ottawa, and 87.0% were willing to treat their windows. For all survey respondents, the top barriers reducing willingness to treat windows included the perception that birds infrequently or never collide with windows (parameter estimate ± standard error, PE ± SE = -1.29 ± 0.54, p = 0.02), aesthetics (PE ± SE = -0.77 ± 0.31, p = 0.01), and wanting a clear view from windows (PE ± SE = -0.88 ± 0.25, p < 0.01). For those willing to treat their windows, lack of time was the most identified barrier (38.2%), while for those unwilling to treat their windows, the need for more evidence that bird-window collisions require action was most identified (49.1%). Top potential solutions were provision of free materials, aesthetically pleasing materials, and clear instructions. Our results suggest that Ottawa residents are generally willing to treat their windows at home and we identify key barriers between willingness and implementation. To encourage bird-friendly window treatment at a wider scale, we suggest targeted messaging highlighting the impact of low-rise housing in driving the problem and the solution to bird-window collisions. Our results also highlight the opportunity for advocacy groups to aid residents in overcoming practical barriers to treating their windows. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X27D19 Subjects Biodiversity, Community-based Research, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Sociology

Keywords

bird-window collisions, participatory survey, window treatments, pro-environmental behaviour, willingness Dates Published: 2025-05-31 09:39 Last Updated: 2026-02-26 03:34 Older Versions License No Creative Commons license Additional Metadata Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00