A Socio-Epistemic Theory of Attachment: Part III. A Relevance-Based Taxonomy for the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) Coding System
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
In the third and last part of this article, we consider a possible extension of the socio-epistemic theory of attachment- related differences, and we apply the theory to other previously underexplored aspects of the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) coding system. Building on our earlier proposal that attachment patterns reflect differences in epistemic trust, we examine how this framework can illuminate three further key areas of AAI classification: (1) the AAI subclassifications (2) the unresolved/disorganized (U/d) classification; and (3) additional features typical of speakers who are assigned the secure/autonomous AAI classification, including mentalizing. By integrating Relevance Theory, we argue that these dimensions of variation reflect epistemic styles, or systematic differences in how individuals evaluate and share knowledge within interpersonal exchanges. This approach refines our understanding of the AAI coding system and further supports a possible theoretical shift towards conceptualizing attachment differences as fundamental variations in socio-epistemic processes. Keywords: attachment theory, Adult Attachment Interview, mentalizing, trauma, pragmatics, Relevance theory
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00