Incidence of opioid-managed pelvic pain after hysteroscopic sterilization versus laparoscopic sterilization, US 2005-2012
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This study compared opioid-managed pelvic pain incidence within 12 months after hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization and found no significant difference between the two procedures.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Compare incidence of opioid-managed pelvic pain within 12 months after hysteroscopic and laparoscopic sterilization. METHODS: Using administrative claims, we identified women aged 18-49 years without recent history of childbirth who underwent hysteroscopic or laparoscopic sterilization between 2005 and 2012. We defined the outcome as ≥2 diagnoses for pelvic pain and ≥2 prescription fills for opioids. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HR) using Cox models and propensity score methods (matching and inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighting [IPTW]). RESULTS: We identified 71,875 eligible women (hysteroscopic n = 26,927 [37.5%], laparoscopic n = 44,948 [62.5%]). Of those, 236 (0.88%) hysteroscopic patients and 420 (0.93%) laparoscopic patients experienced the outcome (crude HR = 0.97, 95%CI: [0.83, 1.14]). Adjusted analyses also yielded near-null results (matched HR = 1.08, 95%CI [0.90, 1.31]; IPTW HR = 0.97, 95%CI [0.80, 1.18]). While most sensitivity analyses generated results close to the null, hazard ratios estimated using propensity score matching ranged from 0.65 to 1.53. CONCLUSIONS: Among women without recent history of childbirth, we did not find compelling evidence of a clinically meaningful increase in the incidence of pelvic pain requiring opioids during the year after hysteroscopic sterilization. However, effects observed in sensitivity analyses may merit further investigation.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (2)
- Occurrence of Chronic Pelvic Pain, Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, and Hysterectomy Post-procedure among Women Who Have Undergone Female Sterilization Procedures: A Retrospective Claims Analysis of Commercially Insured Women in the US 2017
- Long-term outcomes after elective sterilization procedures — a comparative retrospective cohort study of Medicaid patients 2017
References (21)
- W126183193 via openalex
- W1918955311 via openalex
- W1964047869 via openalex
- W1997705701 via openalex
- W2007631872 via openalex
- W2030856467 via openalex
- W2033639617 via openalex
- W2042119314 via openalex
- W2056194861 via openalex
- W2116312562 via openalex
- W2132761689 via openalex
- W2150285448 via openalex
- W2150291618 via openalex
- W2169105290 via openalex
- W2186987403 via openalex
- W3125459412 via openalex
- W3208310322 via openalex
- W6605147086 via openalex
- W6660956422 via openalex
- W6687415949 via openalex
- W6802869691 via openalex
Cited by (2)
- Occurrence of Chronic Pelvic Pain, Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, and Hysterectomy Post-procedure among Women Who Have Undergone Female Sterilization Procedures: A Retrospective Claims Analysis of Commercially Insured Women in the US 2017
- Long-term outcomes after elective sterilization procedures — a comparative retrospective cohort study of Medicaid patients 2017
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK