Psychological Science is Not Race Neutral
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
In their analysis, Roberts and colleagues (2020) argue that the editors, authors, and participants throughout subfields of psychological science are overwhelmingly White. In this comment, we consider some of the drivers and consequences of this racial inequality. Drawing on race scholarship from in and outside the field, we highlight three phenomena that create and maintain racial inequality in psychology: (1) racial ignorance, (2) threats to belonging, and (3) racial progress narratives. We close by exploring steps that journals and authors can take to reduce racial inequality in our field, ending with an appeal to consider the experience of scholars of color in race scholarship and in psychological science more broadly.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-20T11:00:21.680559+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0