Impact of chronic pelvic pain and painful bladder syndrome on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index on women with deep endometriosis: a cross-sectional study
In women with deep endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain and painful bladder syndrome significantly worsen subjective sleep quality, sleep disturbances, and sleep duration.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This cross-sectional study evaluated how chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and painful bladder syndrome (PBS) affect overall sleep quality and specific sleep dimensions in 140 women with deep endometriosis (DE), using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) alongside the O’Leary–Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptoms and Problem Index. Only 13% of women with DE reported good sleep; women with DE and no/mild pain had a higher proportion of good sleepers, while most with moderate/severe pain and most with PBS were poor sleepers. Regression analyses showed that adding CPP worsened subjective sleep quality (more than threefold), increased sleep disturbances (nearly sixfold), and reduced sleep duration (practically sevenfold), and PBS specifically increased sleep disturbances by nearly fivefold. The paper does not state a main limitation in the provided text beyond its cross-sectional design, and it does not publicly release data due to institutional policy. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it quantifies how CPP and painful bladder syndrome impact PSQI-measured sleep quality in women with deep endometriosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
5,950 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusions
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-07-28T06:14:09.330459+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-07-28T06:13:05.984087+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine