A smartphone-based genetically recombinant whole-cell biosensor for highly sensitive monitoring of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are highly carcinogenic and persistent pollutants commonly found in ecosystems. Their complex congeners pose a huge challenge to instrumental analysis and ELISA methods, which prefer single and known targets. To overcome this limitation, here we developed an Escherichia coli whole-cell biosensor (WCB) for simultaneously detecting multiple PCB congeners. In this sensor, PCBs were firstly converted into hydroxylated PCBs (OH-PCBs) by bphAB degradation circuits, which then serve as high-affinity targets of transcriptional factor HbpR CBP6 -based sensing pathways for sensitive response through extensive chassis screening. The resulting biosensor BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 - bphAB shows the lowest detection limits for 2-CBP (2-chlorobiphenyl) to date and can recognize various PCB homologues, including 3-CBP, 4-CBP, 2,3-diCBP and 2,2’-diCBP, with detection limits of 0.06-1 μM. Further investigation of the docking structure and binding energy reveal that HbpR CBP6 has a stronger affinity for OH-PCBs than for PCBs, indicating that the conversion of PCB by BphAB enzymes is a key step to improve the sensitivity of WCB. Subsequently, we developed an immobilized hydrogel WCB and a smartphone-based detection procedure to facilitate real-time and user-friendly PCB detection. This study will not only advance the biomonitoring of PCB contaminants but also provide an innovative strategy for developing metabolic pathway-sensing proteins combined biosensor. Graphical Abstract
Full text 49,186 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
A smartphone-based genetically recombinant whole-cell biosensor for highly sensitive monitoring of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results A smartphone-based genetically recombinant whole-cell biosensor for highly sensitive monitoring of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) View ORCID Profile Qiangqiang Luo , Faying Zhang , Mengjie Zhang , Shantong Hu , Xin Li , Li Pan , View ORCID Profile Zhenghui Lu , View ORCID Profile Pan Wu , View ORCID Profile Guimin Zhang doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.28.601110 Qiangqiang Luo a State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University , Wuhan, Hubei 430062, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Qiangqiang Luo Faying Zhang a State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University , Wuhan, Hubei 430062, China b College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology , Beijing 100029, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Mengjie Zhang a State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University , Wuhan, Hubei 430062, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Shantong Hu b College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology , Beijing 100029, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Xin Li a State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University , Wuhan, Hubei 430062, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Li Pan a State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University , Wuhan, Hubei 430062, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Zhenghui Lu a State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University , Wuhan, Hubei 430062, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Zhenghui Lu Pan Wu a State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University , Wuhan, Hubei 430062, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Pan Wu For correspondence: zhangguimin{at}mail.buct.edu.cn zhangguimin6{at}hotmail.com wupan{at}hubu.edu.cn Guimin Zhang a State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University , Wuhan, Hubei 430062, China b College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology , Beijing 100029, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Guimin Zhang For correspondence: zhangguimin{at}mail.buct.edu.cn zhangguimin6{at}hotmail.com wupan{at}hubu.edu.cn Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Preview PDF Abstract Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are highly carcinogenic and persistent pollutants commonly found in ecosystems. Their complex congeners pose a huge challenge to instrumental analysis and ELISA methods, which prefer single and known targets. To overcome this limitation, here we developed an Escherichia coli whole-cell biosensor (WCB) for simultaneously detecting multiple PCB congeners. In this sensor, PCBs were firstly converted into hydroxylated PCBs (OH-PCBs) by bphAB degradation circuits, which then serve as high-affinity targets of transcriptional factor HbpR CBP6 -based sensing pathways for sensitive response through extensive chassis screening. The resulting biosensor BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 - bphAB shows the lowest detection limits for 2-CBP (2-chlorobiphenyl) to date and can recognize various PCB homologues, including 3-CBP, 4-CBP, 2,3-diCBP and 2,2’-diCBP, with detection limits of 0.06-1 μM. Further investigation of the docking structure and binding energy reveal that HbpR CBP6 has a stronger affinity for OH-PCBs than for PCBs, indicating that the conversion of PCB by BphAB enzymes is a key step to improve the sensitivity of WCB. Subsequently, we developed an immobilized hydrogel WCB and a smartphone-based detection procedure to facilitate real-time and user-friendly PCB detection. This study will not only advance the biomonitoring of PCB contaminants but also provide an innovative strategy for developing metabolic pathway-sensing proteins combined biosensor. Download figure Open in new tab Graphical Abstract 1. Introduction Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are a class of chlorinated biphenyl compounds produced by replacing hydrogen atoms at different positions with chlorine atoms, including 2-chlorobiphenyl (2-CBP), 2,2’-dichlorinated biphenyl (2,2’-CBP), 2,4,4’-trichlorobiphenyl (2,4,4’-CBP), etc. PCBs were originally used for various industrial purposes, such as dielectric and heat transfer fluids, lubricants, flame retardants, and plasticizers ( Erickson and Kaley, 2011 ). Due to their high persistence and toxicity, many countries have explicitly banned its use and it has been classified as a human carcinogen (Class I) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( Lauby-Secretan et al., 2013 ). However, hundreds of millions of kilograms of PCBs are currently released into the environment( Zhang et al., 2021 ). The major threat to human health from PCBs in the environment is through bioaccumulation in the food chain ( Qadeer et al., 2019 ; Rao et al., 2022 ; Richter et al., 1994 ). Therefore, monitoring PCBs is of global concern and effective techniques are urgently needed for detecting PCBs in routine samples ( Wania and Mackay, 1993 , 1996 ). The diversity of environmental samples and the composition of PCB homologues pose great challenges to traditional instrument-based analytical techniques, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and ELISA methods that prefer to single and known targets ( Deng et al., 2002 ; Erickson, 2018 ; Johnson et al., 2001 ; Reddy et al., 2019 ; Tsutsumi et al., 2008 ). In this context, whole-cell biosensors (WCBs) offer a promising alternative that not only alleviates the limitations of expensive instruments and expertise, but also enable simultaneous detection of multiple homologues ( Bickman et al., 2018 ). Moreover, by integrating adsorption and metabolic circuits, WCBs can be extended to in-situ environmental bioremediation ( Commault and Weld, 2016 ; Zhu et al., 2024 ). Nevertheless, due to the lack of direct sensing proteins, almost no WCBs have been reported yet for PCBs detection. In fact, some researchers have tried to monitor PCBs indirectly by detecting PCB degradation intermediates. For example, through the upstream biphenyl pathway, PCBs are decomposed into chlorobenzoic acids (CBAs), which can be detected by WCBs containing P m -gfp sensing circuit. The upstream biphenyl pathway typically involves four enzymes: biphenyl 2,3-dioxygenase (BphA), cis-2,3-dihydro-2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl dehydrogenase (BphB), 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl 1,2-dioxygenase (BphC) and 2-hydroxy-6-phenylhexa-2,4-dienoate hydrolase (BphD) ( Pieper, 2005 ). Another example is that Liu’s research group combining the BphABCD degradation pathway with CBAs-induced P m -gfp sensing circuit to construct a Pseudomonas fluorescens F113L::1180-GFP to monitor degradation product of PCBs in soil ( Liu et al., 2010 ). However, P. fluorescens produces natural yellow-green fluorescent pigment that interferes with the GFP reporter signal. The rapid advancement in synthetic biology and genetic engineering has enabled the genetic identification of whole-cell biosensors by integrating heterologous metabolic pathways and transcriptional elements into designated chasses strains ( Chen et al., 2023 ). For example, the HbpR/PhbpC sensing pathway from P. azelaica HBP strain was transplanted into an E. coli strain to prepare WCB for the detection of 2-hydroxybiphenyl (2-HBP) ( Jaspers et al., 2001 ). Based on this, Siham et al. screened a variant of HbpR (I101V/D128N) and named it HbpR CBP6 . The biosensor based on this variant displays a 20-fold increase in sensitivity to 2-HBP and an expanded response to 2-CBP, with a detection limit of 1.5 μM. However, this biosensor shows a weak or no response to homologous PCBs ( Beggah et al., 2008 ). It seems that HbpR CBP6 has a higher affinity for hydroxylated biphenyl (OH-PCBs). We speculate that if PCBs can be converted to OH-PCBs, then HbpR CBP6 should also be able to recognize OH-PCBs and be used for indirect detection of PCBs. In this study, the HbpR CBP6 sensing module and the bphAB genes (encoding BphA and BphB enzymes that convert PCBs to OH-PCBs) derived from the B. xenovorans were integrated into genetically clear E. coli cells, and a highly sensitive WCB for the detection of PCBs was successfully constructed. After optimization, the best WCB could detect various PCB homologues, including 2-CBP, 4-CBP, 3-CBP 2,3-diCBP, 2,2’-diCBP, with detection limits ranging from 0.06 μM to 1 μM. Moreover, to provide a user-friendly solution for daily PCBs analysis, the optimized sensor cells were finally embedded in a gelatin-based hydrogel to prepare a smartphone-based detection program, thereby facilitating a smart, economical, real-time and on-site PCB monitoring in the real-world. 2. Materials and methods 2.1 Strains and chemicals E. coli strains DH5α, TOP10, DB3.1, BL21(DE3), and Rosetta (DE3) were purchased from Tsingke Biotech (Beijing, China). E. coli HUBU is a DH5α-derived mutant strain generated in our laboratory ( He et al., 2024 ). Analytical grade inducers, including 2-hydroxybiphenyl (2-HBP), 2-chlorinated biphenyl (2-CBP), 3-chlorinated biphenyl (3-CBP), 4-chlorinated biphenyl (4-CBP), 2,3-dichlorinated biphenyl (2,3-diCBP), 2,2’-dichlorinated biphenyl (2,2’-diCBP), and 4,4’-dichlorinated biphenyl (4,4’-diCBP), were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. PCR-related enzymes were purchased from Vazyme Biotech (Nanjing, China). Genes and primers ( Table S1 ) were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Tryptone and yeast extract for Luria broth (LB) medium were purchased from Oxoid (Hampshire, UK). 2.2 Construction of plasmids and whole-cell biosensors Plasmid construction was carried out using standard molecular biology techniques to create the sensing plasmids. The genes encoding HbpR wt or HbpR CBP6 protein and the EGFP reporter were connected to the ends of P hbpR and P hbpC promoter by fusion PCR, respectively, to form an HbpR wt or CBP6-P hbpR -P hbpC -EGFP expression cassette, which was then inserted into the Sal I/ Eco R I dual-digested pUC57 vector to obtain the final plasmids pUC57-HbpR wt -P hbpC -egfp and pUC57-HbpR CBP6 -P hbpC -egfp, respectively. To generate a PCB degrading plasmid, the genes encoding the BphAB enzymes were placed downstream of the strong constitutive promoter PUTR to create a sensor gene expression cassette ( Zhou et al., 2021 ). This cassette was then cloned into the Bam H I/ Hin d III dual-digested pMD18-T vector to generate the final plasmid pMD18-T-PUTR-bphAB. The sensor plasmids pUC57-HbpR wt -P hbpC -egfp and pUC57-HbpR CBP6 -P hbpC -egfp were transformed into different E. coli strain to obtain the first-stage WCBs, respectively. Similarly, seven second-stage WCBs were obtained by transforming the sensor plasmid pUC57-HbpR CBP6 -P hbpC - egfp and the PCB degrading plasmid pMD18-T-P UTR - bphAB into different E. coli strains, respectively. 2.3 Cell growth, fluorescence assays and data analysis For each whole-cell biosensor, 3-4 single clones were inoculated into 100 mL LB medium supplemented with antibiotic (kanamycin 50 μg/mL and ampicillin 100 μg/mL), and incubated at 37°C and 220 rpm. Once an optical density at 600 nm (OD 600 ) of 0.6-0.8 was reached, the cell pellets were harvested by centrifugation at 4°C and 3800 rpm for 10 minutes, followed by washing three times with 3-(N-morpholino) propane sulfonic acid buffer containing 0.2% glucose (MOPS-G) and resuspended in MOPS-G buffer to an OD 600 of 0.6. Next, 4 mL of suspended cells were treated with various PCB inducers at a ratio of 1000:1 to achieve final concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 1000 μM and then incubated at 30°C and 180 rpm for 6 hours. Afterwards, 200 μL of the induced sample was transferred to a microplate reader, and the fluorescence intensity and OD 600 were measured using a fluorescent microplate reader (Spectra M2, Molecular Devices). The fluorescence value of each sample was calculated by normalizing fluorescence intensity to OD 600 . Finally, the resulting data were analyzed and plotted using GraphPad Prism software. 2.4 Structural analysis The primary amino acids sequence of HbpR wt protein was input into the Alphafold 2, an open-source online prediction website in Google Colab, to generate a simulated structure. Using this as a template, we then simulated the structure of the HbpR CBP6 variant using YASARA software. According to the chemical formula of the inducer, the 3D structure of each inducer was formed using ChemDraw software, followed by energy minimization using YASARA software to obtain the optimized structure. Afterwards, the inducer structure was docked with the 3D structure of HbpR wt or HbpR CBP6 using YASARA software, and the most favorable position and orientations were identified using standard procedures; finally, Discovery Studio software was used to analyze the interaction forces in the HbpR protein-substrate complex structures. 2.5 Immobilization of whole-cell biosensors in gelatin hydrogels To immobilize whole-cell biosensor in hydrogels, we first covered a glass slide with 1 mm thick tape, and the punched a 7 mm diameter hole in the tape using an infrared laser perforator. Next, we cultivated the biosensor E. coli BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 -bphAB in LB medium supplemented with kanamycin and ampicillin until the cell OD 600 reached 0.6-0.8. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 2 minutes and washed 2-3 times with MOPS-G buffer. We then resuspended the cell pellet to an OD 600 =10 by MOPS-G buffer containing 16 U/mL transglutaminase and 10% gelatin to obtain a homogeneous mixture. After these steps, 15 μL of the homogenized mixture was pipetted into the wells on the glass slide and the gel was cross-linked at 37 ℃ for 20 minutes. The cross-linked gelatin cell mixture was mixed with different concentrations of 2-CBP and induced for 6 hours. The glass slide was then photographed under a blue light detector and the fluorescence intensity was quantified using ImageJ software. 3. Results and Discussions 3.1 Construction of transcriptional factor HbpR CBP6 -based E. coli whole-cell biosensor Two HbpR/P hbpC sensing circuits were reported to function as whole-cell biosensors (WCBs) for the detection of 2-HBP and 2-CBP ( Beggah et al., 2008 ). Therefore, we reconstructed these two WCBs, DH5α/HbpR wt and DH5α/HbpR CBP6 , by introducing the HbpR sensing circuits into E. coli DH5α cells. Similar to the report ( Beggah et al., 2008 ), the WCB based on the HbpR CBP6 transcriptional factor variants were significantly more sensitive to the substrate 2-HBP than the DH5α/HbpR wt WCB ( Fig. 1 ). For the 2-CBP target, only the DH5α/HbpR CBP6 biosensor responded at concentrations above 75 μM, with a signal-to-noise (SNR) of 3.66. This is obviously worse than the result reported by Siham et al. (around 1.5 μM). We speculate that this may be due to the inevitable differences in experimental conditions and detection equipment (flow cytometry vs. microplate reader). Overall, the current WCB still need to be improved. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. HbpR- based whole-cell biosensor for detection of 2-HBP and 2-CBP. Dose-response curves for wild-type (DH5α/HbpR wt ) and variant (DH5α/HbpR CBP6 ) whole-cell biosensor used to detect 2-HBP (A) and 2-CBP (B) after induction for 6 hours. 3.2 Chassis genotype is critical for whole-cell biosensors The genotype of chassis strains can profoundly affect the performance of the sensing pathways carried ( Yagur-Kroll and Belkin, 2014 ). For example, Julien et al. observed a 10-fold increase in sensitivity of nickel-iron WCB when E. coli TD2158 was used as a chassis instead of E. coli K12 ( Cayron et al., 2017 ). Our recent study also confirmed that the genotypes of chassis strain does have a significant impact on the effectiveness of WCB ( He et al., 2024 ; Xian et al., 2024 ). Therefore, seven E. coli strains are selected as chassis carrying the hbpR CBP6 -P hbpC -eGFP sensing circuit. These include three commonly used clonal strains (DH5α, Top10, DB3.1), two expression strains (BL21(DE3) and Rosetta (DE3)), and a mutant strain (HUBU) derived from DH5α strain, which served as the best chassis for hypersensitive salicylic acid WCB ( He et al., 2024 ). We observed that biosensors carried by BL21(DE3), Rosetta (DE3), and HUBU strains show significantly enhanced signal intensity and lower LOD compared to the DH5α strain. In contrast, the biosensor-carrying Top10 strain displays a worse response than DH5α, and biosensor-carrying DB3.1 did not respond to 2-CBP at all. Among these strains, the best chassis BL21(DE3) and Rosetta (DE3) show approximately three times lower LOD (from 75 μM to 23.5 μM) and 2.7-fold increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than the DH5α strain ( Fig.2 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Dose-response curves of HbpR CBP6 -based whole-cell biosensor with different E. coli chassis for detection of 2-CBP. In this study, we found that the most effective chassis BL21(DE3) and Rosetta (DE3) were both of expression type. This observation is similar to another study in which expression strains BL21(DE3) and MG1655(DE3) were identified as optimal hosts for chlorobenzoic acids (CBA) whole-cell biosensor, whereas clonal strains DH5α, Top10, DB3.1 were found to be relatively poor chassis ( Xian et al., 2024 ). Through genotype comparison of these strains, we find that all positive strains, including BL21(DE3), Rosetta (DE3), and MG1655(DE3), contained functional recA and endA genes in their genomes. In contrast, most of the poorer chassis were recA - endA- deficient strains. The recA and endA genes encode DNA recombinase and endonuclease, respectively, which appear to play major roles in DNA polymerization and recombination ( Bukhamsin et al., 2022 ; Sun et al., 2014 ). We hypothesize that these enzymes may facilitate greater accessibility of cis-acting elements (promoters) in plasmid DNA to trans-acting regulatory proteins (e.g., XylS or HbpR CBP6 ), thereby enhancing transcription of downstream reporter genes. Therefore, WCBs based on these expression-type strains display higher signal output than those strains lacking the recA1-endA1 genes, such as DH5α, Top10, DB3.1 strains. This hypothesis is further supported by studies on DH5α-related HUBU strains, in which the recA1 (D161G) mutation in the HUBU strain may allow DH5α to regain the recombination function lost due to recA1 gene mutation, resulting in the regeneration of recombination activity of later sensing strains ( He et al., 2024 ). Finally, the HUBU strain carried a salicylic acid (SA) biosensor, and our PCB biosensors all show higher sensitivity and signal strength than the DH5α strain. Poor chassis, on the other hand, contain various genetic defects in energy or amino acid synthesis pathways. For example, DH5α strain lacks the GTP-pyrophosphate kinase synthesis gene relA , Top10 is a strain defective in the leucine synthesis gene, and DB3.1 lacks the γ-glutamyl phosphate reductase gene proA2 ( Durfee et al., 2008 ; Jeong et al., 2017 ; Kwon et al., 2020 ). These defects may slow down the expression of sensing proteins and reporter genes, resulting in poorer WCB chassis. 3.3 Developing PCB WCBs by additionally introducing bphAB degradation pathway Since HbpR CBP6 has a higher affinity for OH-PCBs, this inspired us to convert PCB into a higher affinity OH-PCB intermediate for indirect detection of PCB. To achieve this, we integrated the bphAB genetic circuit derived from the B. xenovorans LB400 strain ( Hofer et al., 1994 ) into the BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 WCB to generate a novel BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 - bphAB WCB. These two genes encode bphA and bphB enzymes that convert PCB to OH-PCB, which may serve as a higher affinity ligand for the HbpR CBP6 transcriptional factor. Our results show that the additive bphAB genetic circuit does not affect the signal intensity of the BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 - bphAB WCB. Furthermore, the detection limit of 2-CBP was significantly reduced by about 68.8-fold (from 23.5 μM to 0.34 μM). This is the lowest LOD achieved for 2-CBP to date and is 4.4-fold lower than the biosensor (1.5 μM) reported by Siham Beggah et al ( Fig. 3 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Dose-response curves of HbpR CBP6 - and bphAB- based whole-cell biosensor with E. coli BL21 (DE3) for detection of 2-CBP. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. PCB detection range of the BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 - bphAB whole-cell biosensor. 3-CBP: 3-chlorinated biphenyl; 4-CBP: 4-chlorinated biphenyl; 4, 4’- DiCBP: 4, 4’-dichlorinated biphenyl; 2, 2’-DiCBP: 2, 2’-dichlorinated biphenyl; 2, 3- DiCBP: 2, 3-dichlorinated biphenyl. The increased sensitivity of BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 - bphAB WCB can be attributed to the catalytic conversion of the lower affinity target 2-CBP to the higher affinity hydroxylated 2-CBP (2,3-diOH-2-CBP) target catalyzed by bphA-bphB enzymes. This speculation is further supported by the enhanced molecular interaction ( Fig. 5 ) and lower binding energy ( Fig. 6 ) of HbpR CBP6 on 2,3-diOH-2-CBP than 2-CBP. Prior to our study, there have been sporadic reports focusing on monitoring PCB metabolic intermediates for indirect PCB detections. These biosensors are typically developed in Pseudomonas species, which have their own pathways for the degradation of PCB, thereby there is potential interference from autocrine pigments or unknown metabolic pathways ( Gavlasova et al., 2008 ; Liu et al., 2010 ). Contrary to these reports, our WCB is the first example of transplanting a heterogenous PCB metabolic pathway into an E. coli species for indirect PCB detections. E. coli strains have become popular chassis for synthetic biology due to their clear genetic background and systematic operational procedures. These advantages allow us to develop highly reactive, low background BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 - bphAB WCB through chassis screening and genetic reorganization, and could also promote the practical application of PCB WCBs in academia and industry. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5. Interaction forces between HbpR and 2-CBP or its analogs. (A) HbpR wt and 2-CBP. (B) HbpR CBP6 and 2-CBP. (C) HbpR CBP6 and 2, 3-diOH-2-CBP. (D) HbpR CBP6 and 2, 3-diOH-2, 3-diCBP. Yellow indicates hydrophobic interactions, pink indicates π-cation interactions, blue indicates hydrogen bond interactions, and green indicates halogen bond. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 6. Bonding energies of HbpR wt with 2-CBP, HbpR CBP6 with 2-CBP, 2, 3-diOH-2-CBP, and 2, 3-diOH-2, 3-diCBP, respectively. 3.4 Detection spectrum of BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 - bphAB whole-cell biosensor PCBs contain a variety of homologues with different numbers of chlorine atoms and substitution positions. This is a critical issue for instrumental and ELISA based analysis, as they generally prefer single targets. Whole-cell biosensors capable of detecting multiple homologues simultaneously would offer tremendous advantageous for real-world PCB detection. We have demonstrated that the optimized BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 - bphAB WCB was highly responsive to 2-CBP ( Fig. 3 ). To evaluate its potential for detecting complex PCBs, we further evaluated its ability to respond against 5 other PCB homologues, including 3-chlorobiphenyl (3-CBP), 4-chlorobiphenyl (4-CBP), 2,3-dichlorobiphenyl (2,3-diCBP), 2,2’-dichlorobiphenyl (2,2’-diCBP), and 4,4’- dichlorobiphenyl (4,4’-diCBP). Our results show that the final WCB displays sensitive responses to 4 test targets, including 2,3-diCBP, 2,2’-diCBP, 4-CBP and 3-CBP, with LODs close to 0.06 μM, 0.3 μM, 0.88 μM and 1 μM, respectively ( Fig. 4 ). However, no response to 4,4’-diCBP was observed. The highest and lowest responses of the BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 -bphAB biosensor to the 2,2’- diCBP and 4,4’-diCBP targets, respectively, may be due to the substrate recognition of different PCB substrates by the BphAB enzymes and determined through different regiospecificity. Indeed, the B. xenovorans LB400-derived BphA enzyme is a 3,4-dioxygenase that typically introduces hydroxyl groups into the positions 3 and 4 of the phenyl ring in PCBs. Therefore, the 2,2’-diCBP product catalyzed by BphA is mainly composed of 2,3-dihydro-2,3-dihydroxy-2’-chlorobiphenyl and 3,4- dihydro-3,4-dihydroxy-2,2’-dichlorobiphenyl. These compounds were subsequently dehydrogenated to 2,3-dihydroxy-2’-chlorobiphenyl (2,3-diOH-2-CBP) and 3,4-dihydroxy-2,2’- dichlorobiphenyl (3,4-diOH-2,2’-CBP) under the catalysis of BphB dehydrogenase, of which the former is the main product ( Li et al., 2020 ). It is worth noting that 2,3-diOH-2-CBP is also the hydroxylation product of 2-CBP catalyzed by bphAB enzymes and can be well recognized by the HbpR CBP6 transcriptional factor. Therefore, the BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 - bphAB WCB exhibited similar LOD and SNR values to the 2,2’-diCBP and 2-CBP targets. In contrast, the reactivity of BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 - bphAB WCB towards 4,4’-diCBP was negligible, which may be due to the lower selectivity of the BphA enzyme for the para-substituted PCBs substrates (ortho > meta > para) (Gomez Gil, 2006 ). This preference made it difficult for the BphA enzyme to recognize 4,4’-diCBP and convert it into a hydroxylated intermediate for downstream HbpR CBP6 detection. As a result, negligible reactivity was obtained with 4,4’-diCBP even at a concentration of 1000 μM ( Fig. 4 ). Abundant enzyme resources and rapid development of enzyme directed evolution technology have greatly promoted the development of BphA enzymes with expanded substrate spectrum. We anticipated that more desired variants will be introduced into sensitive WCBs to enable broader PCBs detection. 3.5 The recognition mechanism PCB and OH-PCB by HbpR CBP6 To date, a major challenge in developing highly sensitive WCBs for PCB detection has been the lack of efficient PCB sensing proteins. As a pioneer in direct recognition of 2-CBP, HbpR CBP6 provides valuable insights for de novo design or evolution of artificial PCB-sensing proteins. Therefore, structural simulations and molecular docking were carried out to generate complexes of HbpR protein with PCBs and PCB analogs. From these models, we found that the interaction of wild-type HbpR with 2-CBP primarily relied on weak hydrophobic interactions and halogen bonds ( Brammer et al., 2001 ) ( Fig. 5A ), whereas the HbpR CBP6 variant mainly used hydrophobic interactions and residue Arg70 to participate in the well-known and important π-cation interactions with 2-CBP ( Fig. 5B ). π-cation interaction has been recognized as strong noncovalent forces and shown to affect protein-protein and protein-small molecule interactions ( Dougherty, 2007 ; Gokel et al., 2001 ; Torrice et al., 2009 ). Therefore, we hypothesize that the expanded recognition of 2-CBP by HbpR CBP6 protein variants is due to their stronger interactions, thereby enhancing the binding energy between HbpR CBP6 protein and the substrate 2-CBP, which may enable the target to induce conformational changes in the HbpR CBP6 transcriptional factor to promote RNA polymerase binding and gene transcription. This hypothesis is further supported by the higher binding energy between the HbpR CBP6 variant and 2-CBP (-6.39 kcal/mol) than its wild-type counterpart (-6.14 kcal/mol) ( Fig. 6 ). Structural analysis between HbpR CBP6 and the hydroxylated 2-CBP (2,3-diOH-2-CBP) and 2,3- diCBP (2,3-diOH-2,3-diCBP) were also carried out to further verify the speculation that the improved sensitivity of BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 - bphAB WCB for PCB detection was facilitated by the bphAB enzymes-mediated conversion of PCBs into higher-affinity OH-PCBs. Compared with its targets of 2-CBP and 2,3-diCBP, HbpR CBP6 appear to form a more complex interaction network with its hydroxylated ligands, including weak hydrophobic interactions, strong π-cation interactions, and hydrogen bond interactions between hydroxyl groups of hydroxylated intermediates and surrounding residues such as Ser169, Ile180, and Val182 ( Fig. 5C, D ). These interactions obviously enhanced the binding affinity between HbpR CBP6 and hydroxylated 2-CBP and 2,3-diCBP, thereby promoting the indirect detection of PCBs. Likewise, this observation can be further supported by the lower binding energies of HbpR CBP6 with 2,3-diOH-2-CBP and 2,3-diOH-2,3-diCBP than 2-CBP and 2,3-diCBP ( Fig. 6 ). With the increasing public concern about health issues, the demand for affordable and user- friendly sensing devices has grown significantly. Smartphones are almost one-to-one devices, offering a promising medium for diagnose and biosensing ( Yang et al., 2023 ). Using customized Apps, smartphones can quickly analyze target samples by capturing and digitizing signals (colorimetric, fluorescent, electrochemical, and surface plasmon resonance (SPR)) ( Vashist et al., 2015 ). Here, we aimed to integrate our laboratory BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 - bphAB WCB with a smartphone application. To achieve this, we fist immobilized WCB cells into a hydrogel matrix via transglutaminase-gelatin cross-linking and evaluated their sensing capability by exposing them to different concentrations of 2-CBP. Analysis using Image J software shows that a good linear relationship between the logarithm of 2-CBP concentrations and fluorescence intensities in the range of 1 μM to 100 μM ( Fig. 7A, C ), indicating that the immobilized hydrogel WCB has good sensing performance. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 7. Detection of 2-CBP with hydrogel biosensor. (A) Fluorescence changes of 2- CBP at different concentration in MOPS buffer; (B) Fluorescence changes of 2-CBP at different concentration in lake water; (C) Linear relationship between smartphone APP detection of 2-CBP in MOPS buffer; (D) Linear relationship between smartphone APP detection of 2-CBP in lake water. Subsequently, following a similar smart procedure outlined in our recent publication ( He et al., 2024 ), we developed a portable device to capture PCBs-induced fluorescence of immobilized hydrogel biosensors using a smartphone camera, then digitized and output it as a specific image. We evaluated the performance of this smart program by analyzing the above 2-CBP standard solutions. The data output from smartphone exhibited a robust linear function relationship with 2-CBP concentration, with accuracy comparable to Image J software ( Fig. 7C ). We then tried to apply this detection procedure to analyze real environmental samples, but such samples were inconvenient to collect. Therefore, we instead prepared spiked environmental samples by adding 2-CBP to urban lake water. As expected, this smart procedure accurately reflected the spiked samples in the range of 1 μM to 100 μM ( Fig. 7B, D ), almost no interference from other substances in lake water. Overall, these investigations demonstrate the huge potential of our smartphone-based detection devices for intelligent, cost-effective, and rapid analysis of PCBs in the real-world. 4. Conclusion In summary, we have engineered a sensitive E. coli whole-cell biosensor BL21(DE3)/HbpR CBP6 - bphAB by transplanting the bphAB genes derived from the B. xenovorans LB400 strain into E. coli cells and conducted comprehensive strain screening to detect various PCBs in a highly sensitive manner. This WCB exhibits sensitive and broad responsiveness to various PCB homologues, including 2,3-diCBP, 2,2’-diCBP/2-CBP, 4-CBP/3-CBP, with a detection limit ranging from 0.06 μM to 1 μM. We then devised a user-friendly detection procedure by integrating immobilized hydrogel WCB cells, portable imaging device, and a customized smartphone App to facilitate a smart, cost-effective, and rapid detection of PCBs in environmental samples. We believe these studies will promote biomonitoring and bioremediation of PCBs contaminants, thereby contributing to the protection of the environment and human health. Acknowledgements This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (No.2018YFA0901100), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32370101) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (buctrc202131). References ↵ Beggah , S. , Vogne , C. , Zenaro , E. , Van Der Meer , J.R. , 2008 . Mutant HbpR transcription activator isolation for 2-chlorobiphenyl via green fluorescent protein-based flow cytometry and cell sorting . Microbial Biotechnology 1 ( 1 ), 68 – 78 . OpenUrl ↵ Bickman , S.R. , Campbell , K. , Elliott , C. , Murphy , C. , O’Kennedy , R. , Papst , P. , Lochhead , M.J ., 2018 . An innovative portable biosensor system for the rapid detection of freshwater cyanobacterial algal bloom toxins . Environmental Science & Technology 52 ( 20 ), 11691 – 11698 . OpenUrl ↵ Brammer , L. , Bruton , E.A. , Sherwood , P ., 2001 . Understanding the behavior of halogens as hydrogen bond acceptors . Crystal Growth & Design 1 ( 4 ), 277 – 290 . OpenUrl ↵ Bukhamsin , A. , Lahcen , A.A. , De Oliveira Filho , J. , Shetty , S. , Blilou , I. , Kosel , J. , Salama , K.N. , 2022 . Minimally-invasive, real-time, non-destructive, species-independent phytohormone biosensor for precision farming . Biosensors and Bioelectronics 214 , 114515 . OpenUrl ↵ Cayron , J. , Prudent , E. , Escoffier , C. , Gueguen , E. , Mandrand-Berthelot , M.-A. , Pignol , D. , Garcia , D. , Rodrigue , A ., 2017 . Pushing the limits of nickel detection to nanomolar range using a set of engineered bioluminescent Escherichia coli . Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24 , 4 – 14 . OpenUrl ↵ Chen , S. , Chen , X. , Su , H. , Guo , M. , Liu , H ., 2023 . Advances in Synthetic-Biology-Based Whole- Cell Biosensors: Principles, Genetic Modules, and Applications in Food Safety . International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24 ( 9 ), 7989 . OpenUrl ↵ Commault , A. , Weld , R.J ., 2016 . Whole-cell biosensors for monitoring bioremediation . Biofilms in Bioremediation: Current Research and Emerging Technologies , 75 – 92 . ↵ Deng , A.-P. , Kolář , V. , Ulrich , R. , Fránek , M ., 2002 . Direct competitive ELISA for the determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in soil samples . Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 373 , 685 – 690 . OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Dougherty , D.A. , 2007 . Cation-π interactions involving aromatic amino acids . The Journal of Nutrition 137 ( 6 ), 1504S – 1508S . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Durfee , T. , Nelson , R. , Baldwin , S. , Plunkett Iii , G. , Burland , V. , Mau , B. , Petrosino , J.F. , Qin , X. , Muzny , D.M. , Ayele , M ., 2008 . The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli DH10B: insights into the biology of a laboratory workhorse . Journal of Bacteriology 190 ( 7 ), 2597 – 2606 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Erickson , M.D ., 2018 . Analytical Chemistry of PCBs . Routledge . ↵ Erickson , M.D. , Kaley , R.G ., 2011 . Applications of polychlorinated biphenyls . Environmental Science and Pollution Research 18 ( 2 ), 135 – 151 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Gavlasova , P. , Kuncova , G. , Kochankova , L. , Mackova , M ., 2008 . Whole cell biosensor for polychlorinated biphenyl analysis based on optical detection . International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 62 ( 3 ), 304 – 312 . OpenUrl ↵ Gokel , G.W. , Barbour , L.J. , Stephen , L. , Meadows , E.S ., 2001 . Macrocyclic polyethers as probes to assess and understand alkali metal cation-π interactions . Coordination Chemistry Reviews 222 ( 1 ), 127 – 154 . OpenUrl ↵ Gomez Gil , L., 2006 . Characterization of the molecular basis for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) transformation by biphenyl dioxygenase . University of British Columbia . ↵ He , N. , Wei , Q. , Li , Y. , Hu , S. , Xian , Y. , Yang , M. , Wu , P. , Lu , Z. , Zhang , G ., 2024 . A sensitive, portable, and smartphone-based whole-cell biosensor device for salicylic acid monitoring . Biosensors and Bioelectronics 257 , 116329 . OpenUrl ↵ Hofer , B. , Backhaus , S. , Timmis , K.N ., 1994 . The biphenyl/polychlorinated biphenyl-degradation locus (bph) of Pseudomonas sp. LB400 encodes four additional metabolic enzymes . Gene 144 ( 1 ), 9 – 16 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Jaspers , M.C.M. , Schmid , A. , Sturme , M.H.J. , Goslings , D.A.M. , Kohler , H.-P.E. , Roelof van der Meer , J., 2001 . Transcriptional organization and dynamic expression of the hbpCAD genes, which encode the first three enzymes for 2-hydroxybiphenyl degradation in Pseudomonas azelaica HBP1 . Journal of Bacteriology 183 ( 1 ), 270 – 279 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Jeong , H. , Sim , Y.M. , Kim , H.J. , Lee , S.J ., 2017 . Unveiling the hybrid genome structure of Escherichia coli RR1 (HB101 RecA+) . Frontiers in Microbiology 8 , 251972 . OpenUrl ↵ Johnson , J.C. , Van Emon , J.M. , Clarke , A.N. , Wamsley , B.N. , 2001 . Quantitative ELISA of polychlorinated biphenyls in an oily soil matrix using supercritical fluid extraction . Analytica Chimica Acta 428 ( 2 ), 191 – 199 . OpenUrl ↵ Kwon , K.K. , Yeom , S.-J. , Choi , S.-L. , Rha , E. , Lee , H. , Kim , H. , Lee , D.-H. , Lee , S.-G. , 2020 . Acclimation of bacterial cell state for high-throughput enzyme engineering using a DmpR- dependent transcriptional activation system . Scientific Reports 10 ( 1 ), 6091 . OpenUrl ↵ Lauby-Secretan , B. , Loomis , D. , Grosse , Y. , El Ghissassi , F. , Bouvard , V. , Benbrahim-Tallaa , L. , Guha , N. , Baan , R. , Mattock , H. , Straif , K ., 2013 . Carcinogenicity of polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated biphenyls . Lancet Oncology 14 ( 4 ), 287 – 288 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Li , J. , Min , J. , Wang , Y. , Chen , W. , Kong , Y. , Guo , T. , Mahto Jai , K. , Sylvestre , M. , Hu , X ., 2020 . Engineering Burkholderia xenovorans LB400 BphA through Site-Directed Mutagenesis at Position 283 . Applied and Environmental Microbiology 86 ( 19 ), e01040 – 01020 . OpenUrl ↵ Liu , X. , Germaine , K.J. , Ryan , D. , Dowling , D.N ., 2010 . Whole-cell fluorescent biosensors for bioavailability and biodegradation of polychlorinated biphenyls . Sensors 10 ( 2 ), 1377 – 1398 . OpenUrl ↵ Pieper , D.H ., 2005 . Aerobic degradation of polychlorinated biphenyls . Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 67 , 170 – 191 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Qadeer , A. , Liu , S. , Liu , M. , Liu , X. , Ajmal , Z. , Huang , Y. , Jing , Y. , Khalil , S.K. , Zhao , D. , Weining , D ., 2019 . Historically linked residues profile of OCPs and PCBs in surface sediments of typical urban river networks, Shanghai: Ecotoxicological state and sources . Journal of Cleaner Production 231 , 1070 – 1078 . OpenUrl ↵ Rao , Q. , Wang , X. , Zhang , Q. , Hoogenboom , R. , Li , H. , Deng , Z. , Song , W. , Cheng , L. , Liu , X. , Guan , S ., 2022 . New insights into the transfer and accumulation of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in the food web of farmed Chinese mitten crabs: A typical case from the Yangtze River area . Journal of Hazardous Materials 436 , 129178 . OpenUrl ↵ Reddy , A.V.B. , Moniruzzaman , M. , Aminabhavi , T.M ., 2019 . Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the environment: Recent updates on sampling, pretreatment, cleanup technologies and their analysis . Chemical Engineering Journal 358 , 1186 – 1207 . OpenUrl ↵ Richter , C.A. , Drake , J.B. , Giesy , J.P. , Harrison , R.O ., 1994 . Immunoassay monitoring of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the Great Lakes . Environmental Science and Pollution Research 1 , 69 – 74 . OpenUrl ↵ Sun , L.-J. , Feng , Q.-M. , Yan , Y.-F. , Pan , Z.-Q. , Li , X.-H. , Song , F.-M. , Yang , H. , Xu , J.-J. , Bao , N. , Gu , H.-Y ., 2014 . Based electroanalytical devices for in situ determination of salicylic acid in living tomato leaves . Biosensors and Bioelectronics 60 , 154 – 160 . OpenUrl ↵ Torrice , M.M. , Bower , K.S. , Lester , H.A. , Dougherty , D.A ., 2009 . Probing the role of the cation–π interaction in the binding sites of GPCRs using unnatural amino acids . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 ( 29 ), 11919 – 11924 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Tsutsumi , T. , Miyoshi , N. , Sasaki , K. , Maitani , T ., 2008 . Biosensor immunoassay for the screening of dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in retail fish . Analytica Chimica Acta 617 ( 1-2 ), 177 – 183 . OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Vashist , S.K. , van Oordt , T. , Schneider , E.M. , Zengerle , R. , von Stetten , F. , Luong , J.H.T. , 2015 . A smartphone-based colorimetric reader for bioanalytical applications using the screen-based bottom illumination provided by gadgets . Biosensors and Bioelectronics 67 , 248 – 255 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Wania , F. , Mackay , D ., 1993 . Global fractionation and cold condensation of low volatility organochlorine compounds in polar regions . Ambio , 10-18. ↵ Wania , F. , Mackay , D ., 1996 . Peer reviewed: tracking the distribution of persistent organic pollutants . Environmental Science & Technology 30 ( 9 ), 390A – 396A . OpenUrl ↵ Xian , Y. , Zhang , F. , Wang , M. , Zhao , X. , Sun , X. , Lu , Z. , Zhang , G ., 2024 . Whole-cell biosensor engineering based on the transcription factor XylS/Pm for sensitive detection of PCB intermediate chlorobenzoic acid . Biochemical Engineering Journal 202 , 109153 . OpenUrl ↵ Yagur-Kroll , S. , Belkin , S ., 2014 . Molecular manipulations for enhancing luminescent bioreporters performance in the detection of toxic chemicals . Bioluminescence: Fundamentals and Applications in Biotechnology-Volume 2 , 137 – 149 . OpenUrl ↵ Yang , Y. , Xu , F. , Chen , J. , Tao , C. , Li , Y. , Chen , Q. , Tang , S. , Lee , H.K. , Shen , W ., 2023 . Artificial intelligence-assisted smartphone-based sensing for bioanalytical applications: A review . Biosensors and Bioelectronics , 115233 . ↵ Zhang , S. , Gu , Y. , Tang , A. , Li , B. , Li , B. , Pan , D. , Wu , Y ., 2021 . Forecast of future yield for printed circuit board resin waste generated from major household electrical and electronic equipment in China . Journal of Cleaner Production 283 , 124575 . OpenUrl ↵ Zhou , S. , Yuan , S.-F. , Nair , P.H. , Alper , H.S. , Deng , Y. , Zhou , J ., 2021 . Development of a growth coupled and multi-layered dynamic regulation network balancing malonyl-CoA node to enhance (2S)-naringenin biosynthesis in Escherichia coli . Metabolic Engineering 67 , 41 – 52 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Zhu , X. , Xiang , Q. , Chen , L. , Chen , J. , Wang , L. , Jiang , N. , Hao , X. , Zhang , H. , Wang , X. , Li , Y ., 2024 . Engineered Bacillus subtilis Biofilm@ Biochar living materials for in-situ sensing and bioremediation of heavy metal ions pollution . Journal of Hazardous Materials 465 , 133119 . OpenUrl View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted July 02, 2024. Download PDF Supplementary Material Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following A smartphone-based genetically recombinant whole-cell biosensor for highly sensitive monitoring of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share A smartphone-based genetically recombinant whole-cell biosensor for highly sensitive monitoring of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) Qiangqiang Luo , Faying Zhang , Mengjie Zhang , Shantong Hu , Xin Li , Li Pan , Zhenghui Lu , Pan Wu , Guimin Zhang bioRxiv 2024.06.28.601110; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.28.601110 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools A smartphone-based genetically recombinant whole-cell biosensor for highly sensitive monitoring of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) Qiangqiang Luo , Faying Zhang , Mengjie Zhang , Shantong Hu , Xin Li , Li Pan , Zhenghui Lu , Pan Wu , Guimin Zhang bioRxiv 2024.06.28.601110; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.28.601110 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Bioengineering Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7644) Biochemistry (17728) Bioengineering (13916) Bioinformatics (42037) Biophysics (21489) Cancer Biology (18637) Cell Biology (25553) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13401) Ecology (19941) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24367) Genetics (15622) Genomics (22547) Immunology (17764) Microbiology (40475) Molecular Biology (17208) Neuroscience (88747) Paleontology (667) Pathology (2842) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4834) Physiology (7659) Plant Biology (15175) Scientific Communication and Education (2047) Synthetic Biology (4304) Systems Biology (9835) Zoology (2272)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00