The use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during percutaneous coronary intervention does not reduce all cause in-hospital mortality but doubles the cost with higher utilization in privately insured patients
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Background The effect of using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on short-term mortality is not well established. The goal of this study was to evaluate any association between the use of IVUS during PCI on mortality vs no ICUC in a large inpatient database. Method We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for available ICD-10 codes from 2016-2020 for IVUS and PCIs. Results A total of 10,059,56 PCIs were performed. 206,910 underwent IVUS-guided PCI vs 9,852,359 without IVUS use. Mortality did not differ between the two groups with 2.52% mortality in the IVUS arm vs 2.59% in no IVUS cohort, p=0.4. The mean age of patients with ICUS use was 65.5 vs 70.1 years without IVUS. Total in-hospital cost in the IVUS group was double that without IVUS (141,920$ vs 71,568$). Furthermore, IVUS utilization was significantly higher in patients with private HMO patients (28.3% vs 17.2%). Conclusion In-patient all-cause mortality using IVUS during PCI was similar to those patients without IVUS utilization but doubled the cost with higher utilization in privately insured patients
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00