OC29: Cost‐effectiveness of magnetic resonance image‐guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for the treatment of uterine fibroids
article
OA: bronze
CC0
AI-generated summary
This cost-effectiveness analysis determined that magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound is a cost-effective uterine fibroid treatment option, yielding slightly fewer quality-adjusted life years than uterine artery embolization but at a lower lifetime cost than myomectomy.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is an FDA-approved treatment option for women with uterine fibroids. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of MRgFUS vs. alternative treatment options from an ultrasound perspective. Techniques of decision analysis and data from secondary sources were used to develop and estimate an economic model of the management of uterine fibroids among premenopausal women. Patients in the model are assumed to receive first-line treatment with MRgFUS, myomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE), hysterectomy, or pain medication only. Additional rounds of treatment (up to three) for treatment failure or recurrent fibroids were also incorporated in the model. The model predicts total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for each strategy over a lifetime horizon. Data on treatment efficacy and safety were obtained from published and unpublished trial data. Cost data (2005 US$ ) were estimated from a large administrative database and supplemented with expert opinion. Analyses incorporated both direct and indirect (lost productivity) costs. UAE was associated with the most QALYs (17.39), followed by MRgFUS (17.36), myomectomy (17.05), hysterectomy (17.18) and pain management (16.70). Pain management was the least costly strategy ($ 9200 per patient), followed by hysterectomy ($ 19 800), MRgFUS ($ 27 300), UAE ($ 28 900), and myomectomy ($ 35 100). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (cost per QALY gained) were $ 21 800 for hysterectomy, $ 41 400 for MRgFUS and $ 54 200 for UAE; myomectomy was both more costly and less effective than MRgFUS and UAE. Sensitivity analyses indicated that results are sensitive to MRgFUS recurrence rates and treatment costs, as well as assumptions about the quality-of-life decrement following hysterectomy. We conclude that MRgFUS is a cost-effective option for the treatment of uterine fibroids at the oft-cited $ 50 000 per QALY gained threshold.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK