Discharge Dependence of the Linear Growth Rate of Alternate Bars

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Alternate bars are ubiquitous bedforms in alluvial rivers, and excessive bar-height growth can disrupt river ecosystems and increase flood risk. Predicting bar-height variability requires quantifying the dependence of bar growth rate on water discharge, yet this has rarely been achieved because conventional flume measurements interrupt the flow, preventing continuous capture of bar evolution. Here we conducted laboratory experiments under four discharges and four channel slopes (16 conditions) and continuously mapped bed topography using Stream Tomography, a nonintrusive, flow-through measurement technique. Bar height exhibits sigmoidal growth and is well described by the general solution of the Landau equation, allowing robust estimation of the linear growth rate and equilibrium amplitude for each condition. The inferred dimensionless growth rate decreases monotonically with increasing discharge, but its sensitivity to discharge is up to three times weaker than predicted by linear stability theory. This discrepancy becomes more pronounced at lower discharge, indicating limitations of linearization and the influence of interactions among multiple bar modes. Numerical flow simulations over the measured bed topography further reveal that, at low discharge, a large bar height-to-depth ratio enhances flow deflection around bar crests, concentrates sediment transport in scour zones, and slows bar migration. These processes stabilize scour locations and promote bar-height growth. Together, these results provide benchmark constraints for bar stability theories and improve predictions of bar-height variability under changing discharge regimes.
Full text 2,695 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Alternate bars are ubiquitous bedforms in alluvial rivers, and excessive bar-height growth can disrupt river ecosystems and increase flood risk. Predicting bar-height variability requires quantifying the dependence of bar growth rate on water discharge, yet this has rarely been achieved because conventional flume measurements interrupt the flow, preventing continuous capture of bar evolution. Here we conducted laboratory experiments under four discharges and four channel slopes (16 conditions) and continuously mapped bed topography using Stream Tomography, a nonintrusive, flow-through measurement technique. Bar height exhibits sigmoidal growth and is well described by the general solution of the Landau equation, allowing robust estimation of the linear growth rate and equilibrium amplitude for each condition. The inferred dimensionless growth rate decreases monotonically with increasing discharge, but its sensitivity to discharge is up to three times weaker than predicted by linear stability theory. This discrepancy becomes more pronounced at lower discharge, indicating limitations of linearization and the influence of interactions among multiple bar modes. Numerical flow simulations over the measured bed topography further reveal that, at low discharge, a large bar height-to-depth ratio enhances flow deflection around bar crests, concentrates sediment transport in scour zones, and slows bar migration. These processes stabilize scour locations and promote bar-height growth. Together, these results provide benchmark constraints for bar stability theories and improve predictions of bar-height variability under changing discharge regimes. Supplementary Material File (1064710_0_merged_1770277568.pdf) - Download - 3.89 MB Information & Authors Information Version history Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Keywords

Authors Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 104views 74downloads Citations Download citation Shohei Seki, Daichi Moteki, Hiroyasu Yasuda. Discharge Dependence of the Linear Growth Rate of Alternate Bars. Authorea. 11 February 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.177083777.78331598/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.177083777.78331598/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00