Using Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid for Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis Laboratory Diagnosis
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) for MycobacteriumTuberculosis (MTB) infection using laboratory methods. Methods: : A retrospective study was conducted in patients diagnosed with active pulmonary tuberculosis (APTB) and lacking sputum quality/quantity. BALF collected during the operation processes of Electric bronchoscopy were tested using Ziehl-Neelsen staining acid-fast bacilli smear microscopy (Z-N-AFB-SM), GeneXpert MTB/RIF(Xpert),loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), or culturing with BACTEC™ Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube™ 960 (MGIT). Chi-square test was used for statistic analysis. Results: : 331 suspected APTB patients were enrolled in this study. 224 of them were sputum-scarce. 89 were sputum-sufficient andnegative in both Z-N-AFB-SM and MGIT 960 testing. Of the sputum sufficient patients, BALF-testing confirmed APTB diagnosis in 20.2% (18/89) via Z-N-AFB-SM, and 53.0% (35/89) via MGIT. The total positive rates of BALF testing via four aforementioned methods were 18.2% (57/313), 66.4% (168/253), 61.0% (83/136) and 48.2% (140/290) respectively. The positive rate of MTB discovered in BALF collected by well-trained respiratory physicians are significantly higher than those collected by anesthetists (χ2=22.48, P <0.01). Total adverse events incidence of BAL was 1.9% (6/313). Conclusion: BALF has a similar sensitivity and specificity for APTB laboratory diagnosis. It can be used as a complementary diagnostic method for APTB when sputum availability is poor. The proficiency of BALF collection is an important factor affecting the detection results.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00