Alternative probe chemistries for single-molecule analysis of long non-coding RNA

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Single-molecule microscopy has been widely used to study the structure and dynamics of RNA, but extension to larger systems such as long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) has proven challenging. Methods such as single-molecule kinetic analysis of RNA transient structure (SiM-KARTS), where the binding of a short, complementary oligonucleotide probe is used to determine accessibility of a specific region of the RNA, are promising. However, adapting SiM-KARTS to systems as complex as lncRNA requires careful optimization of experimental variables that have not been thoroughly explored. In this work, SiM-KARTS, thermal denaturation experiments, and circular dichroism spectroscopy were used to analyze the binding behaviors of probes with alternative backbone chemistries, specifically DNA with locked nucleic acid (LNA) residues incorporated and morpholinos. A segment of lncRNA that enabled control over the accessibility of the target sequence was used as a model. We show that optimizing probe backbone chemistry can allow for a more precise distinction between different structures of the target RNA, and for fine-tuning of probe binding stability without the structural impacts that other variables such as ionic concentration may have. Specifically, we demonstrate that LNA probes exhibit a high degree of structural sensitivity in both their binding and unbinding kinetics. We further show that when binding and unbinding rates are considered holistically, LNA probes allow traces arising from different target RNA structures to be individually classified with a high degree of accuracy. These results provide design principles for the application of SiM-KARTS to target RNAs of increased complexity such as lncRNA.
Full text 1,879 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Single-molecule microscopy has been widely used to study the structure and dynamics of RNA, but extension to larger systems such as long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) has proven challenging. Methods such as single-molecule kinetic analysis of RNA transient structure (SiM-KARTS), where the binding of a short, complementary oligonucleotide probe is used to determine accessibility of a specific region of the RNA, are promising. However, adapting SiM-KARTS to systems as complex as lncRNA requires careful optimization of experimental variables that have not been thoroughly explored. In this work, SiM-KARTS, thermal denaturation experiments, and circular dichroism spectroscopy were used to analyze the binding behaviors of probes with alternative backbone chemistries, specifically DNA with locked nucleic acid (LNA) residues incorporated and morpholinos. A segment of lncRNA that enabled control over the accessibility of the target sequence was used as a model. We show that optimizing probe backbone chemistry can allow for a more precise distinction between different structures of the target RNA, and for fine-tuning of probe binding stability without the structural impacts that other variables such as ionic concentration may have. Specifically, we demonstrate that LNA probes exhibit a high degree of structural sensitivity in both their binding and unbinding kinetics. We further show that when binding and unbinding rates are considered holistically, LNA probes allow traces arising from different target RNA structures to be individually classified with a high degree of accuracy. These results provide design principles for the application of SiM-KARTS to target RNAs of increased complexity such as lncRNA. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Figures and tables condensed, minor clarifying edits made to text

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00