Incision scar’s endometriosis case that was treated with false diagnosis
This case report describes a 45-year-old woman with abdominal wall endometriosis in a cesarean scar misdiagnosed as reactive lymphadenopathy.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper reports a 45-year-old woman with a painful, enlarging mass at the site of a Pfannen-Stiel cesarean-section incision 14 years earlier, including imaging features on superficial ultrasonography and subsequent surgical management. The patient had previously been misdiagnosed as reactive lymphadenopathy related to toe fungal and bacterial infections and was treated for an extended period before presenting to the authors’ clinic. The initial clinical diagnosis for the abdominal-wall lesion was incision-scar endometriosis, and pathology of the excised tissue confirmed endometriosis; the authors emphasize that abdominal-wall masses after cesarean delivery can be confused with conditions such as foreign body reaction, granuloma, abscess, or incisional hernia. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it is a case report of incision scar endometriosis that was initially treated due to a false diagnosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
3,375 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (5)
- Cesarean scar endometriosis--a case report. via openalex
- Different patterns of pelvic ureteral endometriosis. What is the best treatment? Results of a retrospective analysis via openalex
- Laparoscopic Trocar Port Site Endometriosis: A Case Report and Brief Literature Review via openalex
- Scar Endometriosis: a Case Report with Literature Review. via openalex
- Scar endometriosis: an entity not to be forgotten. via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00