Impact of energy devices on the post-operative systemic immune response in women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease of the uterus
article
OA: diamond
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic surgery is associated with reduced surgical stress response, lesser post- operative immune function, and consequent early recovery compared with conventional open surgery. There is a lack of evidence regarding the inflammatory stress response with the use of different energy devices. The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare the inflammatory response in total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) using three different energy devices. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in 60 women with abnormal uterine bleeding undergoing TLH. They were divided into three groups based on the energy devices used, namely integrated bipolar and ultrasonic energy (Thunderbeat), ultrasonic (Harmonic) and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (Ligasure). Cytokines and chemokines were measured in all three groups at different time points. RESULTS: Serum levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) increased postsurgery in all three groups and gradually declined by 72 hours. The geometric mean serum (IL)-6 levels was highest with Ligasure at 24 hours as compared with the other groups. Levels of TNF-α, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP-1) α, MIP-1 β were also higher at 3 hours in the Ligasure group. When the differences between the groups were measured at different time points, there was a significantly greater increase in serum IL-6 levels in the Ligasure group at 24 hours (p=0.010). No significant difference was found in the post-operative course between the groups. CONCLUSION: A greater inflammatory response was seen after the use of Ligasure indicating greater tissue damage. However, this response was not correlated with any difference in postoperative recovery.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
References (20)
- doi:10.1007/s004640010061 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.10.008 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00533.x via openalex
- doi:10.4314/tjpr.v13i4.8 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/bja/72.3.272 via openalex
- doi:10.4172/2155-9899.1000197 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.05.014 via openalex
- doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10007-1215 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00384-010-1056-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s11418-014-0841-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.md.0000481801.40636.7e via openalex
- W1845196765 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e31824336e2 via openalex
- W7073577639 via openalex
- W7073930709 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/md.0000000000001786 via openalex
- doi:10.17772/gp/2072 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/1553350608324933 via openalex
- doi:10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.847 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-011-2001-z via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:16:32.963054+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK