ACMG Secondary Findings in the Brazilian Rare Genomes Project: Insights from 5,402 genome sequencing

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Purpose Secondary findings (SF) are pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in genes unrelated to the primary purpose of genetic testing. The American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) provides guidelines on which SF should be reported, involving 81 genes linked to different conditions. With the increasing use of genome sequencing (GS), SF are more frequently detected, presenting challenges for healthcare systems. The Brazilian population is often underrepresented in genomic studies, which limits population-specific knowledge. Objective This study aimed to outline the profile of SF in the Brazilian Rare Genomes Project (BRGP). Methods We analyzed retrospectively SF (ACMG) data from GS of 5,402 BRGP individuals. Results Of the 5,316 cases who consented to receive SF, 3.6% (191 cases) had at least one SF. The most common genes identified were TTR, TTN, and BRCA2 . SF were mainly related to cardiovascular conditions (40.2%) and cancer predisposition (37.6%). Some variants, such as TTR: c.424G>A; p. (Val142Ile) and TP53: c.1010G>A; p. (Arg337His), were recurrent, reflecting population-specific traits and founder effects. Novel variants were 10.6% of SF. Conclusion SF rate varies across studies and populations. While SF can aid early diagnosis, their relevance is debated due to potential psychological and healthcare burdens. Effective genetic counseling and public health policies are essential.
Full text 3,344 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose Secondary findings (SF) are pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in genes unrelated to the primary purpose of genetic testing. The American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) provides guidelines on which SF should be reported, involving 81 genes linked to different conditions. With the increasing use of genome sequencing (GS), SF are more frequently detected, presenting challenges for healthcare systems. The Brazilian population is often underrepresented in genomic studies, which limits population-specific knowledge.

Objective

This study aimed to outline the profile of SF in the Brazilian Rare Genomes Project (BRGP).

Methods

We analyzed retrospectively SF (ACMG) data from GS of 5,402 BRGP individuals.

Results

Of the 5,316 cases who consented to receive SF, 3.6% (191 cases) had at least one SF. The most common genes identified were TTR, TTN, and BRCA2. SF were mainly related to cardiovascular conditions (40.2%) and cancer predisposition (37.6%). Some variants, such as TTR: c.424G>A; p. (Val142Ile) and TP53: c.1010G>A; p. (Arg337His), were recurrent, reflecting population-specific traits and founder effects. Novel variants were 10.6% of SF.

Conclusion

SF rate varies across studies and populations. While SF can aid early diagnosis, their relevance is debated due to potential psychological and healthcare burdens. Effective genetic counseling and public health policies are essential. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This study was funded by Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein in partnership with PROADI-SUS from the Brazilian Ministry of Health (Law 12.101/2009). Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: Ethics committee of Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein gave ethical approval for The Brazilian Rare Genomes Project and related studies (CAAE: 9567220.4.1001.0071). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Avaliability The anonymized data supporting the findings of this study are provided in Table 1 in supplementary material. Further details regarding the data and variants can be obtained upon request from the corresponding author.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00