Unequal health risk alarms: How thresholds drive false-positive burdens across sex and race

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Health risk stratification algorithms are increasingly deployed in clinical and public health settings. Despite their potential to predict future outcomes, improve efficiency and consistency, these tools can perpetuate disparities when error patterns fall disproportionately across demographic groups. This study evaluated a simple cardiovascular risk index using NHANES 2017-2018 to examine how a threshold-based classification distributes predictive errors among sex and race subgroups. At a cutoff labeling the top 70% of individuals as 'high risk,' sensitivity was perfect across all subgroups. Yet false positives were not evenly distributed: males were misclassified more often than females (59% vs. 42%), and differences across racial groups reached more than 10 percentage points. These results highlight how technical choices, particularly thresholds, translate into unequal burdens in real-world clinical practice. We discuss the implications for equity, operational trust, and accountability, and recommend fairness auditing, threshold calibration, and transparent reporting as essential components of responsible model deployment.
Full text 6,152 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Unequal health risk alarms: How thresholds drive false-positive burdens across sex and race | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 8 January 2026 V1 Latest version Share on Unequal health risk alarms: How thresholds drive false-positive burdens across sex and race Author : Ela Adhikari 0009-0004-6673-6050 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176790714.41177516/v1 105 views 52 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Health risk stratification algorithms are increasingly deployed in clinical and public health settings. Despite their potential to predict future outcomes, improve efficiency and consistency, these tools can perpetuate disparities when error patterns fall disproportionately across demographic groups. This study evaluated a simple cardiovascular risk index using NHANES 2017-2018 to examine how a threshold-based classification distributes predictive errors among sex and race subgroups. At a cutoff labeling the top 70% of individuals as 'high risk,' sensitivity was perfect across all subgroups. Yet false positives were not evenly distributed: males were misclassified more often than females (59% vs. 42%), and differences across racial groups reached more than 10 percentage points. These results highlight how technical choices, particularly thresholds, translate into unequal burdens in real-world clinical practice. We discuss the implications for equity, operational trust, and accountability, and recommend fairness auditing, threshold calibration, and transparent reporting as essential components of responsible model deployment. Supplementary Material File (unequal health risk alarms.pdf) Download 370.05 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 08 January 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License Keywords algorithm artificial intelligence false positive health risk threshold Authors Affiliations Ela Adhikari 0009-0004-6673-6050 [email protected] Basis Oro Valley High School, Oro Valley View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 105 views 52 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Ela Adhikari. Unequal health risk alarms: How thresholds drive false-positive burdens across sex and race. Authorea . 08 January 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176790714.41177516/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.176790714.41177516/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe1b53aba15e2c5',t:'MTc3OTE3OTA5NA=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00