Empowering Multilingual Learners: Real-World Adaptation of Multimodal Strategies in English Education

Empowering Multilingual Learners: Real-World Adaptation of Multimodal Strategies in English Education | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Empowering Multilingual Learners: Real-World Adaptation of Multimodal Strategies in English Education Xiaoyan Lian This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6766863/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The research investigates the adaptation process of multimodal strategies used by secondary English teachers at multilingual classrooms to develop student engagement, language proficiency, and identity development. The study examines the integration of student home languages in English teaching through digital storytelling, collaborative tasks, and bilingual media projects, utilizing multimodal learning principles and translanguaging teaching methods. The research team investigated instructional effectiveness using qualitative case study methods in Guangdong, China, which relied on classroom observations, interviews with teachers, student work examples, and the collection of artifacts. The study demonstrated that students made significant progress in their oral skills and vocabulary development, and boosted their language confidence while completing multimodal assignments that incorporated all their linguistic skills. The study results show that institutions featuring rigid curricular instructions and restricted access to technology warrant teachers to exercise professional autonomy through development programs. The paper offers practical insights into classroom multimodal translanguaging approaches in real-world environments, while advocating for institutional improvements in inclusive English education structures. multimodal approaches English education multilingual classrooms digital media inclusive pedagogy creative practices student engagement translanguaging policy reform Figures Figure 1 1. INTRODUCTION Current English education in multilingual classrooms is undergoing rapid transformation due to the collaboration between technology, digital media, and innovative teaching methodologies. The diversity of classrooms makes English a powerful tool for critical thinking, identity development, and building international rapport (Kress, 2010). Standard teaching techniques fall short in attracting students from multicultural backgrounds who speak different languages. Teaching approaches that unite text materials with images, digitized content, sound, and movements are valuable educational solutions to address this issue. Such approaches enable teachers to deliver content in diverse formats, which in turn builds inclusive educational settings that foster multiple literacy approaches and cultural representation (Jewitt, 2009). The effectiveness of multimodal education approaches in monolingual teaching spaces is promising. However, more evidence-based studies are needed to reveal their functions in multilingual classrooms whose students leverage their languages as valuable educational resources. The researchers study teacher implementation and modification of multimodal strategies during their instruction of English language classes with diverse student language backgrounds. The investigators aim to identify effective classroom strategies and implementation methods, as well as understand their impact on student success, while exploring factors that contribute to their effectiveness. The analysis focuses on translanguaging methods, digital media projects created by students, and group learning activities that integrate native languages with English acquisition. The research provides grounded insights into classroom multimodal instruction through systematic observations of teachers, interviews, and assessments of student work and teaching resources. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness and generate practical knowledge about modifying strategies to better support multilingual learners. To guide this inquiry, the following research questions are addressed: How do teachers use multimodal strategies to support engagement and comprehension among multilingual English learners? What classroom factors contribute to the success or limitations of these multimodal approaches? How can these strategies be adapted to better accommodate diverse linguistic backgrounds in English instruction? This study helps bridge the gap between theory and practice in multimodal pedagogy for multilingual learners, offering practical implications for educators, curriculum developers, and language education policymakers. 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Theoretical Frameworks To understand multimodal strategies properly in multilingual classrooms, one needs theoretical frameworks that are comprehensive and strong. This section applies multimodality, sociocultural learning, and translanguaging theories to understand language mediation in diverse classrooms. 2.1.1 Multimodality Theory According to Multimodality theory, meaning-making situations extend beyond language because readers make sense of information through various symbolic modes like visual, spatial, gestural, and auditory components (Kress & van Leeuwen, 2001). The approach challenges the long-standing dominance of alphabetic literary standards in language instruction. The current era has relegated writing to a secondary role in representation and communication, according to Kress (2010, p. 1). A new approach is necessary in classrooms with multilingual students because it opens up more opportunities for them to demonstrate what they understand, whether through writing in English or not. Teachers encounter various benefits and challenges when applying this theory in the classroom. The effective use of multimodal learning strongly depends on skilled teachers who can apply these learning methods in meaningful ways. The study focuses on how students’ interactions with various tools and languages, backgrounds, and classroom are related to one another. 2.1.2 Sociocultural Theory According to sociocultural theory, students learn through social interactions because language is a mediating tool, and Vygotsky is its foundation. The theory demonstrates that students learn through interactions with others while participating in culturally determined activities. The research of Langeloo et al. ( 2019 ) demonstrates that students gain improved cognitive development and language proficiency through home language-based collaborative learning frameworks (p. 540). This theory needs more elements beyond cultural recognition and collaborative learning practices. The theory pushes educational staff to recognize which language practices earn legitimacy within the educational setting. Educational projects that blend various languages and multimedia approaches enable children to establish resistance fronts against uniform language policies. The research expands upon original findings by examining multilingual learning methods that enable students to maintain control over meaning construction while operating within institutional rules. 2.1.3 Translanguaging Theory The translanguaging theory upsets the artificial separation between primary and secondary languages. García and Wei (2014) explain translanguaging theory, describing it as “the process by which multilingual speakers utilize their full linguistic repertoire to make meaning, construct identities, and perform communicative functions” (p. 67). The educational model proves highly effective when used in classrooms that span multiple modes, as students utilize their complete language systems to create meaning through various forms of media. Translanguaging practice surpasses appreciation for linguistic diversity because it necessitates conscious educational planning. English classroom teachers must accompany their students' home language use by permitting exposure, providing supportive structures, and ensuring linguistic validation. A study evaluates inadequate understanding of translanguaging as mere code-switching before examining how teachers use their authority to enhance or limit these practices in actual classrooms that use digital storytelling and multimedia tasks. 2.2 Review of Relevant Studies Research studies have examined multimodal learning in language teaching. While research into multimodal learning in language development continues to increase, thorough analysis of its classroom usage remains limited within educational institutions that face curricular limitations. New studies most often work with monolingual settings or point to the usefulness of multimodal tools in simple classroom situations, ignoring the difficulties that multilingual classrooms encounter due to curriculum rules and limited resources. In their 2019 work, Hirsch and Macleroy highlight that digital storytelling enables students to represent their identities through the use of multimedia, language, and voice. Although their research supports the value of these tools for engagement and affirming identity, much of it is applicable to places where teachers can make significant decisions and access necessary materials. On the other hand, our study focuses on multimodal storytelling in environments with more rules, where both student creativity and teacher flexibility are crucial for these strategies. Similarly, Smith et al. ( 2022 ) investigate how students become authors and producers of knowledge by composing multimodally. Still, they primarily focus on what the students achieved rather than how teachers supported them. Scaffolding language transfer and allowing translanguaging becomes the main job of the teacher in our multilingual classrooms. It seems clear that these multimodal tools can be ineffective until they include guidance for learners about code-meshing, adding subtitles to narrations, or scripting in both languages. In addition, both Ntelioglou et al. ( 2014 ) and Hyun et al. ( 2022 ), among others, suggest that multimodal methods are especially valuable in developing creative literacy. However, these studies often isolate digital tools from the sociopolitical realities of classroom implementation. The role of teachers as content deliverers and policy navigators in under-resourced settings remains under-examined. Our research addresses this gap by foregrounding teacher agency and institutional constraints as key variables in the successful application of multimodal strategies. 2.2.1 The Role of Literature and Digital Media in English Education Conventional monolingual literature presents an accessibility challenge to multilingual learners who want to develop empathy and critical thinking skills in the English classroom context. According to Kress (2010) and Jewitt (2009), schools should expand their semiotic tools by incorporating digital texts and graphic novels because these multimodal projects attract more students through varied learning approaches. Research studies tend to widely demonstrate the benefits of tools while neglecting to address configuration issues in constrained educational environments. The research examines how the effective use of bilingual digital storytelling techniques helps students learn more effectively despite institutional limitations in educational support. 2.2.2 Multilingualism and Its Impact on Language Learning Research consistently highlights the cognitive and metalinguistic advantages of multilingual students (Barac et al., 2014 ; García & Wei, 2014). However, in practice, schools often fail to leverage these assets effectively. While Cummins (2000) champions the validation of home languages as a foundation for identity and academic success, few studies critically examine how this validation occurs—or fails to—in real classrooms. Our findings reveal that bilingual scaffolding, student-authored scripts, and visual narratives can be practical translanguaging tools that bridge home and school discourses. In contrast to studies that treat multilingualism as a backdrop, this study foregrounds it as a dynamic pedagogical asset requiring structural and teacher-driven support. 2.2.3 Creative Pedagogies in Teaching English Creative pedagogies, including digital storytelling, role-play, and collaborative design tasks, are often praised for boosting learner agency and engagement (Marshall, 2020; Langeloo et al., 2020 ). However, many studies lack a critical lens on how institutional constraints mediate their implementation. Creativity thrived in classrooms observed for this study where teachers exercised autonomy and used students’ full linguistic repertoires. Conversely, less confident or inexperienced teachers often defaulted to superficial strategies, limiting students’ creative expression. Our analysis offers a nuanced perspective: while creative pedagogies hold promise, their impact is contingent upon structural support and educators’ ability to employ multimodal tools in culturally responsive and linguistically inclusive ways. 2.3 Gaps in the Literature Research on the use of multimodal approaches within multilingual English classrooms remains sparse, despite growing interest in this subject. Most academic studies on multimodal learning focus on homogeneous classrooms, such as those with a single language or mainstream students. However, little research exists on teaching strategies within education ecosystems where learners possess multiple languages. Ntelioglou et al. ( 2014 ) are researchers who delved into urban elementary school practices of multimodal and multilingual literacy. The research project demonstrated how digital resources with linguistic assets present a potent educational combination; however, institutions often restrict teachers from exercising independent agency. Researchers at Hirsch and Macleroy ( 2019 ) revealed how digital storytelling functions as a primary multimodal approach to enable multilingual students to integrate personal storytelling with multiple languages effectively. The current research primarily focuses on elementary classrooms and specific projects, which fail to provide conclusive findings that can be adapted to secondary educational settings and teacher implementation practices. This indicates that research by Smith et al. ( 2022 ) and Hyun et al. ( 2022 ) evaluates how multilingual students benefit from creating videos and podcasts through multimodal practices. Many research investigations choose to collect insights from students who demonstrate their creative work, rather than examining how teachers implement teaching practices or their curricular limitations in classroom settings. Documented research about how teachers transform theory into practice through multimodal strategies remains scarce in classrooms with rigid learning frameworks and scarce resource availability. The independent analysis of translanguaging as an isolated concept represents a contradiction because both constructs ensure students can create meanings without limitations regarding modes or languages. Research on students' use of multimodal and translanguaging frameworks in practice remains sparse, as it does not address student transitions between linguistic and visual modes when creating digital narratives, nor teacher support of home languages through visual communication. This study addresses these gaps by examining how secondary English teachers in multilingual classrooms use and modify multimodal strategies in real-time instruction. It contributes to the literature by: Offering detailed classroom analysis that connects teacher intent, pedagogical choices, and student responses. Investigating digital storytelling and collaborative tasks as vehicles for both language learning and identity expression. Exploring the interplay between institutional barriers, teacher training, and the feasibility of implementing such strategies effectively. The study expands the empirical foundation for multimodal multilingual pedagogy and provides practical insights for educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers seeking to move beyond monolingual instructional norms. 2.4 Implications for Practice The conclusions of this literature review produce important implications that affect educational practice and governmental policy regulation. For teachers to be successful using multimodal teaching, they need programs that improve their professional skills. It is essential that teacher training equips individuals with the skills to utilize technology, employ translanguaging strategies, and adopt culturally aware practices. Firms should make use of interactive whiteboards, multimedia software environments, and bilingual dictionaries for extended learning. Curriculum developers need to design educational resources that cater to the linguistic and cultural diversity found among students in schools. When such gaps are closed, educators can design effective learning spaces for all students with different home languages. 2.5 Future Directions in Research Future investigations should examine the long-term effects of multimodal educational methods on the educational achievement, mental development, and social adjustment of multilingual students. Research should investigate methods to integrate technology into multimodal educational strategies, aiming to maximize student learning in multilingual instructional settings. Studies must gather the voices and first-hand perspectives of multilingual learners to understand what works best for their educational journey. Investigators in these areas will inform education approaches that enable students to learn in more than one language. 3. METHODS 3.1 Research Design Through qualitative research methods, the effectiveness of multimodal teaching strategies is evaluated in multilingual classrooms teaching English to students. A case study approach is an ideal method for analyzing educational phenomena when observing them in their original settings, according to Yin (2018). The study adopts an interpretive paradigm because it acknowledges the significance of social dynamics and cultural factors that influence academic learning (Creswell & Poth, 2018). Qualitative techniques are well-suited for this research investigation because they enable researchers to provide detailed insights into instructional approaches, teaching obstacles, and student focus. The research enhances its methodological strength through the triangulation methodology, which combines classroom observations with interviews, analysis of student work, and evaluation of classroom artifacts. The study primarily relies on qualitative research methods, yet it also conducts a small survey involving students to verify emerging patterns and supplement knowledge about student engagement levels. 3.2 Sampling Method The research team employed purposive sampling as their method for selecting participants, targeting those who met predetermined criteria. The researchers worked with secondary schools in Guangdong, China, serving students from different linguistic backgrounds. Participating teachers brought different levels of experience in multimodal instruction, while ten students were participating in English classes through multimodal teaching methods. The additional questionnaire administered to thirty students supported the findings by providing quantitative data to verify the qualitative results. The researcher selected participants from diverse teaching backgrounds and students with different instructional settings to gain a thorough understanding of multilingual classroom multimodal practices. Guest et al. (2006) employed data saturation principles to demonstrate the appropriate sample size, as this ensured thematic convergence, thereby enhancing the credibility of the research results. 3.3 Data Collection Methods Data were collected through multiple methods to ensure a holistic understanding of the research problem: Classroom Observations : The research team watched actual classroom sessions to document teachers' implementation of multimodal teaching methods. The research assessed how teachers interacted with students while exploring various visual and auditory instructional devices and monitoring educational advancement. The research team took comprehensive observation notes throughout every session. Semi-Structured Interviews : Semi-structured interviews enabled teachers to share their ongoing experiences, challenges, and personal observations regarding multimodal teaching. Participating teachers responded to open-ended interview questions, which enabled in-depth responses. Sample questions included: How do multimodal teaching and learning affect student engagement and academic performance in multilingual classrooms? What are the best practices for integrating creative and inclusive methods in English education for multilingual contexts? How can technology and multimedia resources enhance the effectiveness of multimodal teaching approaches in multilingual classrooms? What challenges do educators face in implementing multimodal approaches in multilingual English classrooms? What practical solutions can be proposed to support integrating multimodal strategies in multilingual English education? Analysis of Student Work : The analysis of student work, which included written documents, digital assignments, and multimedia projects, investigated how multimodal strategies influenced creativity, language skills, and student engagement. Classroom Artifacts : Additional classroom resources, including weekly lessons and instructional aids with digital education resources, were examined to understand multimodal teaching techniques in practice. 3 .4 Data Analysis Techniques The researchers analyzed the data using thematic methods, maintaining their analysis in NVivo software to establish systematic coding systems. Multiple reviews of transcripts and observation notes allowed the researchers to perform open coding, identifying recurring themes. The researcher established major themes from which they grouped all coded data, including instructional effectiveness, technological barriers, and student engagement. The data analysis achieved 85% reliability when reviewed by an independent reviewer. The survey data processing, using descriptive statistics, generated numerical findings that supplemented the results obtained from the qualitative themes. 3.5 Ethical Considerations The research study adhered to ethical guidelines, which included obtaining informed consent from all participants. All data was kept anonymous and confidential using encrypted data storage systems and pseudonym identification. All study participants could voluntarily join and withdraw at any point during research activities. The research received proper approval from an institutional review board for ethical purposes. 3.6 Limitations The research has yielded extensive findings; however, researchers need to address specific limitations within this work. The research contains data from 10 teaching professionals and 10 educational students for qualitative assessment, and it utilizes surveys from 30 additional students to present restricted quantitative evidence. The achieved data saturation could be strengthened by using a larger randomized sample to enhance the study's generalizability. The analysis area of focus is Guangdong, which has a significant impact on the universal applicability of these findings beyond the province. The supplementary survey helps strengthen this research; however, the study would gain additional statistical power by implementing a comprehensive mixed-methods research design with experimental controls. Future research should conduct extended studies to examine the long-term effects of implementing multimodal teaching methods. 3.7 Future Research Directions Generalizing the effectiveness of multimodal strategies requires additional research involving wider geographic areas and an evaluation of participant diversity in different educational systems. Extended research following students over time will help us understand how multifaceted instruction continues to influence their academic development, identity emergence, and cultural adjustment. Research applying experimental and mixed-methods approaches must verify how teaching with multiple modes affects student achievement measurements. Research into emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence and virtual spaces, is likely to lead to discoveries that facilitate the large-scale implementation of inclusive language education worldwide. 4. RESULTS The findings from this research examine how teachers employ multimodal strategies within classrooms that include students who speak different languages. Study results demonstrate the effectiveness of multimodal strategies while documenting educational challenges that affect student engagement, revealing their influence on learning comprehension. The paper follows with a detailed examination that incorporates supporting scholarly research. 4.1 Effectiveness of Teaching Strategies The frequency and effectiveness of multimodal strategies are displayed in Table 1 based on teachers' experience and proficiency levels. Table 1 Frequency and Effectiveness of Multimodal Strategies Experience Key Strategies Used Effectiveness (1–5) Institutional Barriers Technology Access Professional Support 4–7 years Digital storytelling, group projects 4 Rigid curricula Low Needs more training < 1 year Visual aids, role-playing 1 Limited resources Medium Relies on peer collaboration 1–3 years Digital storytelling, visual aids 2 None High Requires resource access Teachers achieved maximum success with multimodal approaches, which they used strategically, and by permitting students to incorporate their native languages into their learning activities. Digital storytelling, group projects, and interactive technology were teaching methods that experienced teachers frequently used to build student involvement and increase classroom engagement, as Table 1 demonstrates. During an educational session, an educator led students to develop bilingual video diary recordings of their family customs. During the presentation, Jia delivered her Mandarin narrative with her peer-made English subtitle translation. The student expressed to herself that speaking became simpler because understanding messages in two languages helped convey meaning more easily. The educational project enabled Jia to enhance her classroom discussions significantly. The approach aligns with García and Wei’s (2014) translanguaging pedagogy because it enables students to access their complete linguistic resources for creating meaning while demonstrating their identity and completing communicative activities. Under this approach, students gained validation for their language mixing, rather than facing the restriction of treating languages separately. The approach supported both a deeper understanding and emotional student engagement. Research data showed that participants who used multimodal storytelling techniques throughout the project improved their oral skills and vocabulary selection, particularly when they previously avoided speaking activities. The study supports Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory because students learn through social tools and cultural support systems. The cultural artifacts comprising student videos, visuals, and peer engagement served as scaffolds during learning activities. Student engagement became a concern for this novice teacher because they asked, "Will students remain devoted to their assignments?" Ease of mind led me to present only fundamental visuals to the class. The teacher's reluctance diminished student achievement levels and interaction because the data in Table 1 also highlighted this effect. The data demonstrate why teacher confidence, agency, and proper multimodal training are critical for creating effective outcomes with multimodal instruction approaches. 4.2 Institutional Barriers and Technology Integration Table 2 Institutional Barriers and Technology Integration Experience Institutional Barriers Tech Use Effective Tools Used Support Needs 4–7 years Rigid curriculum No N/A Training programs, digital PD < 1 year Lack of resources Yes Padlet, Canva Peer collaboration 1–3 years None Yes Online platforms Curriculum flexibility < 1 year Lack of resources No N/A Funding and tech access All data collected from classroom elements and interviews demonstrated a persistent conflict between school standards and the promotion of creativity. Educational staff identified three critical obstacles: inflexible teaching guidelines, limited device availability, and weak administrative backing. One teacher noted: I frequently needed to bring my laptop and speakers to make a lesson effective. The school has one projector for four classrooms. Despite these constraints, educators with access to external funding or participating in professional development programs were more likely to integrate digital platforms effectively. For instance, a teacher who regularly used Padlet and Canva reported higher student interaction: "When I allow students to create posters for their narratives with online tools, they become more engaged. They often request to keep working even after class." 4.3 Linguistic Diversity and Multimodal Bridging The analysis in Table 3 illustrates the impact of linguistic diversity on multimodal bridging effectiveness. Table 3 Linguistic Diversity and Multimodal Bridging Experience Perceived Impact of Diversity Use of Multimodal Bridging Outcomes Observed 4–7 years Varies widely Yes Enhanced comprehension, identity work < 1 year Creates challenges Not sure Minimal adaptation 1–3 years Improves understanding Not sure Some success, inconsistent strategy 1–3 years Varies widely No Missed opportunities < 1 year Creates challenges Yes Modest gains, potential for growth Classroom data showed that teachers frequently struggled with addressing the diverse linguistic backgrounds of their students. Those who acknowledged and incorporated students' home languages into lessons—via subtitled videos, bilingual glossaries, or peer translation—reported more effective outcomes. One student explained: "I felt a sense of joy when I could write part of the script in my language. It allowed me to grasp better what I wanted to express in English." On the other hand, teachers who hesitated to use translanguaging practices tended to observe limited participation from non-native speakers. This highlights the importance of multimodal bridging in connecting students' prior knowledge with English instruction. 4.4 Student Perceptions of Multimodal Learning A summary of student perspectives on multimodal teaching methods and their impact on learning experiences is presented in Table 4 . Table 4 Student Perceptions of Multimodal Learning Student Language Level First Language Strategy Impact Support Needs Beginner Other Improves understanding Peer support, visual aids Intermediate English Mixed experience More digital support Native-level English Minimal impact Challenge not addressed Advanced English Strong improvement Tech engagement, creativity outlets Student feedback revealed a spectrum of responses. Advanced learners found multimodal assignments empowering, while beginners expressed excitement and frustration. A student noted: "I enjoyed creating the video, but the editing was challenging. I needed assistance with the English section." Peer collaboration helped mitigate these challenges. Less proficient learners benefited from linguistic support in classrooms where students were encouraged to work in pairs or groups. Observations revealed that these students contributed actively through drawings, gestures, and translations. 4.5 Professional Development and Support Needs Table 5 highlights professional development and institutional support needs. Table 5 Professional Development and Support Needs Experience Support Resources Development Needs 4–7 years Ongoing training Workshops on digital tools < 1 year Peer support, Funding Mentorship, curriculum alignment 1–3 years Curriculum flexibility Digital integration and planning 8 + years Training and collaboration Advanced multimodal techniques PD Teachers repeatedly emphasized the need for more consistent training and institutional backing. One teacher stated: "We were supposed to use these new methods, but no one taught us how. I figured it out through trial and error." Professional development sessions focused on digital media, multilingual learning, and classroom management were reported as especially helpful. Informal networks among colleagues also proved valuable, with one teacher describing their support group as "a lifeline." 4.6 Assessment Results Table 6 presents the assessment results based on pre-test and post-test evaluations. Table 6 Results of the Study Assessment Type Mean Score Key Insight Pre-Test 70 Baseline language proficiency Post-Test 85 Notable gains linked to strategy use The pre-test and post-test results (averaging from 70 to 85) show significant improvement. However, this improvement was not uniform across all students or classrooms—it was closely tied to the depth of multimodal strategy integration. These findings support Kress’s (2010) assertion that learning across multiple modes facilitates deeper engagement and a more comprehensive representation of knowledge. In Vygotskian terms, the combination of peer interaction, culturally relevant topics, and multimodal tools served as scaffolding for student development. Students in a particular classroom demonstrated improved vocabulary skills and enhanced grammatical accuracy in spoken English, while their performance in storyboarding and peer video assessment remained steady throughout instruction. Student work examples revealed improved creativity and enhanced sentence complexity in their content production. A bilingual student reflected in an interview: I used to write only short answers. However, with the video project, I needed to describe scenes. I improved my ability to explain feelings and actions in English. This suggests that the multimodal task encouraged language expansion—students had to plan, narrate, and visually express their ideas, engaging more deeply with the language. 4.6.1 The Comparison Results Student performance data indicate substantial growth when teachers use multimodal approaches. Student scores from the post-test assessment show significant improvement, demonstrating the effectiveness of these techniques with multilingual students. The pre- and post-test data demonstrate the effective outcomes that multimodal methodologies produce when applied properly. Students under teachers who used visual, speaking, and writing methods with translation improved their vocabulary development, speaking abilities, and sentence complexity. When participating in a multilingual digital storytelling project, participants improved their scores from the 60s to the mid-80s. Students utilized video recordings that covered various topics, with text subtitles alternating between English and their native language to clarify the more complex sections. To put it in the words of one teacher: "What we aimed for was teaching the skills to think and share their ideas comfortably, whether they spoke Italian or not." The findings demonstrate that assessment gains are significant factors that reflect students’ self-esteem and ability to control their communication. 5. DISCUSSION The research results support Vygotsky's sociocultural theory, demonstrating that interpersonal collaboration and relevant cultural teaching materials facilitate student learning. Professional collaboration through multiple modes enabled students to become active knowledge creators, rather than merely absorbing language lessons. The study demonstrated that teacher agency is vital for facilitating successful translanguaging practices, aligning with Cummins' (2000) perspective on how educational policies should enable teachers to utilize students' home languages in relevant real-world contexts effectively. Data shows that students become most successful when they have opportunities to use their entire language, incorporating their cultural background, and shape their learning through personal expressions in diverse modes of communication. Learners became more engaged through digital storytelling projects, bilingual poster production, and dramatized role-play, as these methods leveraged their pre-existing linguistic abilities. Through these activities, students developed the ability to direct their storytelling by combining the languages they know with English as a means of understanding and communication. One teacher emphasized the significance of these tasks: "Allowing students to share their stories through pictures and their authentic voices made a significant impact. They felt acknowledged, and their confidence in English developed naturally.” Research observations indicated that students who formerly avoided speaking in English started actively participating by giving answers and supervising group activities after the instructional materials shifted from text-based to a combination of visual and aural elements. Learning strategies that follow translanguaging principles allow students to use all their available linguistic tools for deeper comprehension in their studies. García and Wei (2014) explain that translanguaging extends beyond language mixing, as it aims to provide students with personalized approaches to creating meaning. The observed classrooms utilized multimodal strategies, which enabled this achievement. A teacher enabled students to create short films with English dialogue, including native subtitles. Through this support structure, students developed vocabulary skills and gained a better conceptual understanding by investing prolonged time in refining their ideas. Due to flexible instruction practices, students developed an environment that minimized their concerns and allowed them to engage with authentic content and activities freely. Multimodality has brought success to students in multilingual classrooms by offering an alternative approach to language learning, thereby reducing apprehension about grammatical errors and accent judgments. Grade schoolers developed a progressive confidence in their communication, while minimizing linguistic formality. This technique yielded improved language results over time. These gains were measurable. Students who devoted extensive time to multimodal activities scored better on their grammar skills, expanded their vocabulary, and demonstrated improved fluency in speech in post-tests. The classroom environment improved when teachers consistently employed multiple teaching methods, resulting in improved student behavior, enhanced peer teamwork, and standardized participation across different skill levels. This achievement occurred exclusively in certain instances throughout the study area. Non-multimodal training among educators led to resistance, resulting in some teachers instructing their students to use only static images or basic activities. As one less experienced teacher shared: "I used images but was unsure how to make them interactive. The students enjoyed them, but I did not notice significant improvement in their language skills." The comparison shows that multimodal approaches require deliberate planning, as they necessitate teachers with strong proficiency and skill in their application. With proper usage, multimodal strategies serve as effective instruments to develop the potential of multilingual students. However, these instructional methods become ineffective when applied shallowly or incorrectly during learning activities. 6. CONCLUSION This study makes an important contribution to the current literature by focusing on the role of teachers in operationalizing translanguaging through multimodal strategies. Unlike previous research focusing on student outcomes or ideal classroom scenarios, this study grounds its findings in real-world secondary schools with limited resources and structural constraints. It highlights the specific ways educators adapt practices like bilingual video narration, collaborative storyboarding, and peer translation to meet the needs of multilingual learners. Doing so bridges the gap between theory and application, offering practical and policy-relevant insights into inclusive English instruction. Narrowed research findings indicate that multi-input learning methods lead to significant growth in student participation, as well as enhanced academic results and creative abilities, within multilingual English learning environments. Integrating digital storytelling with collaborative projects and interactive media by teachers creates adaptable learning environments that cater to students from diverse linguistic backgrounds. Teachers with higher expertise and extended experience handling multimodal methods deliver better classroom outcomes. Although these approaches show promise, they remain limited by institutional barriers, including rigid educational frameworks, limited resource availability, and a lack of professional development opportunities. These obstacles can be addressed through structural policy improvements, increased funding for technology, and well-organized training for educational professionals. These promising results are, however, limited by several factors in this research. Such research was conducted exclusively within a defined geographic space and institutional network, limiting its ability to demonstrate universal applicability across all multilingual educational settings. Qualitative classroom observation methods, student interview data, and academic work analysis provided unique insights into pedagogical practices. However, they lacked the quantitative evidence required to measure lasting student achievement. Multimodal teaching strategies need further validation through expanded research involving larger subject pools and long-term data analysis, accompanied by qualitative experimental methods that can assess their effectiveness across various educational locations. An assessment becomes possible when researchers investigate how multimodal teaching techniques scale up across different educational levels, combined with cultural environments, alongside studying the sustained language learning and cognitive evolution results. The possibilities of emerging technologies, including AI-driven language tools and virtual learning environments, offer opportunities to enhance the delivery and effectiveness of multimodal, multilingual education. Future research on these key areas will generate innovative teaching strategies for preparing global students in multilingual communication through inclusive learning practices. References Arend B, Sunnen P (2018) Multilingualism in Action: A Conversation Analytic View on How Children are Re-Voicing a Story in a French. Second Lang Learn Lesson 3(2). https://doi.org/10.22492/ijll.3.2.01 Barac R, Bialystok E, Castro D, Sánchez M (2014) The Cognitive Development of Young Dual Language Learners: A Critical Review. Early Child Res Q 29(4):699–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.02.003 Bermingham N (2021) Countering Recapitalization: Examining Teachers' Discourses of Migration in Galicia. Lang Cult Curriculum 34(3):337–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1874965 Coccetta F (2018) Developing university students’ multimodal communicative competence: field research into multimodal text studies in English. System 77:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.01.004 Gilmour R (2017) Reading/writing multilingualism: language, literature, and creativity in the multilingual classroom. Engl Educ 51(3):296–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2017.11964030 Hiippala T, Bateman J (2020) Introducing the diagrammatic semiotic mode. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2001.11224 Hirsch S, Macleroy V (2019) The art of belonging: Exploring the effects on the English classroom when poetry meets multilingual digital storytelling. Engl Educ 54(1):41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2019.1690394 Hyun J, Heidt E, Prasad G (2022) Designing Critical Multilingual Multiliteracies Projects in Two-Way Immersion Classrooms: Affordances and Impacts on Students. Can J Appl Linguistics 25(3):1–32. https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2022.32599 Ibrahim N (2022) Visual and Artifactual Approaches in Engaging Multilingual Teachers: Creating Documents in Pre-Service Teacher Education. Languages 7(2):152. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020152 Jang J (2024) Emerging multilingual children’s school language socialization: a three-year longitudinal case study of a Korean middle school. Languages 9(3):104. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9030104 Kapoyannis T (2019) Literacy Engagement in Multilingual and Multicultural Learning Spaces. Tesl Can J 36(2):1–25. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v36i2.1298 Kwon S (2022) Translanguaging in multilingual English classrooms. Int J Lit Cult Lang Educ 3:76–80. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijlcle.v3i.35385 Langeloo A, Lara M, Deunk M, Klitzing N, Strijbos J (2019) A systematic review of teacher-child interactions with multilingual young children. Rev Educ Res 89(4):536–568. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319855619 Langeloo A, Lara M, Deunk M, LoCasale-Crouch J, Strijbos J (2020) Profiles of learning opportunities for multilingual and monolingual children in kindergarten. Eur J Psychol Educ 36(2):379–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00487-0 Li M (2020) Multimodal pedagogy in TESOL teacher education: Students’ perspectives. System 94:102337 Ntelioglou BY, Fannin J, Montanera M, Cummins J (2014) A multilingual and multimodal approach to literacy teaching and learning in urban education: A collaborative inquiry project in an inner city elementary school. Front Psychol 5:533 Nouri J (2018) Students' multimodal literacy and design of learning during self-studies in higher education. Technol Knowl Learn 24(4):683–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9360-5 Osuna E, Sudholt D (2018) Empirical analysis of diversity-preserving mechanisms on example landscapes for multimodal optimization. 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99259-4_17 O’Halloran K, Tan S, E M (2015) Multimodal analysis for critical thinking. Learn Media Technol 42(2):147–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1101003 Putrawan G, Sinaga T, Poh S, Dekhnich O (2022) Beliefs about multilingualism concerning translanguaging: a survey among pre-service EFL teachers in Indonesia. Integr Educ 26(4):756–770. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.109.026.202204.756-770 Rahmadhani A (2018) A genre-based approach to teaching multimodal text. Curricula 3(2). https://doi.org/10.22216/jcc.2018.v3i2.3571 Reyes-Torres A, Raga MP (2020) A multimodal approach fosters multiliteracy pedagogy in teaching EFL through picture books. Atlantis 42(1):94–119 Salamanti E, Park D, Ali N, Brown S (2023) The Efficacy of Collaborative and Multimodal Learning Strategies in Enhancing English Language Proficiency Among ESL/EFL Learners: A Quantitative Analysis. 1(2):78–89Research Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning Slaughter Y, Cross R (2020) Understanding plurilingual pedagogies in English as an additional language (EAL) classrooms challenges the monolingual mindset. Lang Teach Res 25(1):39–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820938819 Smith BE, Amgott N, Malova I (2022) It made me think differently: Bilingual students’ perspectives on multimodal composing in the English language arts classroom. Tesol Q 56(2):525–551 Son M (2024) Conbat+: Possibilities and challenges in preparing student teachers in English for plurilingual education. Nordic J Lang Teach Learn 11(3). LII-LVIII. https://doi.org/10.46364/njltl.v11i2.1167 Song J, Howard D, Olazabal-Arias W (2022) Translanguaging as a strategy for supporting multilingual learners’ social-emotional learning. Educ Sci 12(7):475. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070475 Thapa D (2023) A review on teachers and students' engagement in mathematics learning: a critical reflection on the Nepalese context. Dhaulagiri J Contemp Iss 1(1):34–39. https://doi.org/10.3126/djci.v1i1.58624 Wagner C, Parra M, Proctor C (2019) Teacher agency in a multi-year professional development collaborative. Engl Teach Pract Critique 18(4):399–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-11-2018-0099 Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Supplementary Files Questionnaire.docx Questionnaire Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6766863","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":463004917,"identity":"1eae43cc-2ef2-4d6b-8f02-6a181e65f23c","order_by":0,"name":"Xiaoyan Lian","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6169-4104","institution":"Zhanjiang Preschool Education College","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xiaoyan","middleName":"","lastName":"Lian","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-05-28 10:01:36","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6766863/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6766863/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":83612620,"identity":"3e4560f2-199d-4c48-be23-a19e99d947b6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-29 12:39:51","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":13451,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eThe comparison of results.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6766863/v1/6fc3210a065f751113bd5a09.png"},{"id":83613577,"identity":"ae306481-8331-47de-b4a0-6ca6376148d5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-29 12:55:51","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1016560,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6766863/v1/8eda5ae3-1ace-47e4-a55d-b8ea77c4054e.pdf"},{"id":83612830,"identity":"13c5bd94-d0ba-4d8d-b26c-d3154d5f61cb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-29 12:47:51","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":36916,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eQuestionnaire\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Questionnaire.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6766863/v1/de2bc5290eb7a371eea333f1.docx"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmpowering Multilingual Learners: Real-World Adaptation of Multimodal Strategies in English Education\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"1. INTRODUCTION","content":"\u003cp\u003eCurrent English education in multilingual classrooms is undergoing rapid transformation due to the collaboration between technology, digital media, and innovative teaching methodologies. The diversity of classrooms makes English a powerful tool for critical thinking, identity development, and building international rapport (Kress, 2010). Standard teaching techniques fall short in attracting students from multicultural backgrounds who speak different languages.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTeaching approaches that unite text materials with images, digitized content, sound, and movements are valuable educational solutions to address this issue. Such approaches enable teachers to deliver content in diverse formats, which in turn builds inclusive educational settings that foster multiple literacy approaches and cultural representation (Jewitt, 2009). The effectiveness of multimodal education approaches in monolingual teaching spaces is promising. However, more evidence-based studies are needed to reveal their functions in multilingual classrooms whose students leverage their languages as valuable educational resources.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe researchers study teacher implementation and modification of multimodal strategies during their instruction of English language classes with diverse student language backgrounds. The investigators aim to identify effective classroom strategies and implementation methods, as well as understand their impact on student success, while exploring factors that contribute to their effectiveness. The analysis focuses on translanguaging methods, digital media projects created by students, and group learning activities that integrate native languages with English acquisition.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe research provides grounded insights into classroom multimodal instruction through systematic observations of teachers, interviews, and assessments of student work and teaching resources. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness and generate practical knowledge about modifying strategies to better support multilingual learners.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo guide this inquiry, the following research questions are addressed:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003col\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow do teachers use multimodal strategies to support engagement and comprehension among multilingual English learners?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat classroom factors contribute to the success or limitations of these multimodal approaches?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow can these strategies be adapted to better accommodate diverse linguistic backgrounds in English instruction?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003c/ol\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study helps bridge the gap between theory and practice in multimodal pedagogy for multilingual learners, offering practical implications for educators, curriculum developers, and language education policymakers.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. LITERATURE REVIEW","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1 Theoretical Frameworks\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo understand multimodal strategies properly in multilingual classrooms, one needs theoretical frameworks that are comprehensive and strong. This section applies multimodality, sociocultural learning, and translanguaging theories to understand language mediation in diverse classrooms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1.1 Multimodality Theory\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccording to Multimodality theory, meaning-making situations extend beyond language because readers make sense of information through various symbolic modes like visual, spatial, gestural, and auditory components (Kress \u0026amp; van Leeuwen, 2001). The approach challenges the long-standing dominance of alphabetic literary standards in language instruction. The current era has relegated writing to a secondary role in representation and communication, according to Kress (2010, p. 1). A new approach is necessary in classrooms with multilingual students because it opens up more opportunities for them to demonstrate what they understand, whether through writing in English or not.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTeachers encounter various benefits and challenges when applying this theory in the classroom. The effective use of multimodal learning strongly depends on skilled teachers who can apply these learning methods in meaningful ways. The study focuses on how students\u0026rsquo; interactions with various tools and languages, backgrounds, and classroom are related to one another.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1.2 Sociocultural Theory\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e According to sociocultural theory, students learn through social interactions because language is a mediating tool, and Vygotsky is its foundation. The theory demonstrates that students learn through interactions with others while participating in culturally determined activities. The research of Langeloo et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) demonstrates that students gain improved cognitive development and language proficiency through home language-based collaborative learning frameworks (p. 540).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis theory needs more elements beyond cultural recognition and collaborative learning practices. The theory pushes educational staff to recognize which language practices earn legitimacy within the educational setting. Educational projects that blend various languages and multimedia approaches enable children to establish resistance fronts against uniform language policies. The research expands upon original findings by examining multilingual learning methods that enable students to maintain control over meaning construction while operating within institutional rules.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1.3 Translanguaging Theory\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe translanguaging theory upsets the artificial separation between primary and secondary languages. Garc\u0026iacute;a and Wei (2014) explain translanguaging theory, describing it as \u0026ldquo;the process by which multilingual speakers utilize their full linguistic repertoire to make meaning, construct identities, and perform communicative functions\u0026rdquo; (p. 67). The educational model proves highly effective when used in classrooms that span multiple modes, as students utilize their complete language systems to create meaning through various forms of media.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTranslanguaging practice surpasses appreciation for linguistic diversity because it necessitates conscious educational planning. English classroom teachers must accompany their students' home language use by permitting exposure, providing supportive structures, and ensuring linguistic validation. A study evaluates inadequate understanding of translanguaging as mere code-switching before examining how teachers use their authority to enhance or limit these practices in actual classrooms that use digital storytelling and multimedia tasks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2 Review of Relevant Studies\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eResearch studies have examined multimodal learning in language teaching. While research into multimodal learning in language development continues to increase, thorough analysis of its classroom usage remains limited within educational institutions that face curricular limitations. New studies most often work with monolingual settings or point to the usefulness of multimodal tools in simple classroom situations, ignoring the difficulties that multilingual classrooms encounter due to curriculum rules and limited resources.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn their 2019 work, Hirsch and Macleroy highlight that digital storytelling enables students to represent their identities through the use of multimedia, language, and voice. Although their research supports the value of these tools for engagement and affirming identity, much of it is applicable to places where teachers can make significant decisions and access necessary materials. On the other hand, our study focuses on multimodal storytelling in environments with more rules, where both student creativity and teacher flexibility are crucial for these strategies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSimilarly, Smith et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) investigate how students become authors and producers of knowledge by composing multimodally. Still, they primarily focus on what the students achieved rather than how teachers supported them. Scaffolding language transfer and allowing translanguaging becomes the main job of the teacher in our multilingual classrooms. It seems clear that these multimodal tools can be ineffective until they include guidance for learners about code-meshing, adding subtitles to narrations, or scripting in both languages.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition, both Ntelioglou et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e) and Hyun et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e), among others, suggest that multimodal methods are especially valuable in developing creative literacy. However, these studies often isolate digital tools from the sociopolitical realities of classroom implementation. The role of teachers as content deliverers and policy navigators in under-resourced settings remains under-examined. Our research addresses this gap by foregrounding teacher agency and institutional constraints as key variables in the successful application of multimodal strategies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2.1 The Role of Literature and Digital Media in English Education\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eConventional monolingual literature presents an accessibility challenge to multilingual learners who want to develop empathy and critical thinking skills in the English classroom context. According to Kress (2010) and Jewitt (2009), schools should expand their semiotic tools by incorporating digital texts and graphic novels because these multimodal projects attract more students through varied learning approaches. Research studies tend to widely demonstrate the benefits of tools while neglecting to address configuration issues in constrained educational environments. The research examines how the effective use of bilingual digital storytelling techniques helps students learn more effectively despite institutional limitations in educational support.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2.2 Multilingualism and Its Impact on Language Learning\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eResearch consistently highlights the cognitive and metalinguistic advantages of multilingual students (Barac et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Garc\u0026iacute;a \u0026amp; Wei, 2014). However, in practice, schools often fail to leverage these assets effectively. While Cummins (2000) champions the validation of home languages as a foundation for identity and academic success, few studies critically examine how this validation occurs\u0026mdash;or fails to\u0026mdash;in real classrooms. Our findings reveal that bilingual scaffolding, student-authored scripts, and visual narratives can be practical translanguaging tools that bridge home and school discourses. In contrast to studies that treat multilingualism as a backdrop, this study foregrounds it as a dynamic pedagogical asset requiring structural and teacher-driven support.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2.3 Creative Pedagogies in Teaching English\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eCreative pedagogies, including digital storytelling, role-play, and collaborative design tasks, are often praised for boosting learner agency and engagement (Marshall, 2020; Langeloo et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). However, many studies lack a critical lens on how institutional constraints mediate their implementation. Creativity thrived in classrooms observed for this study where teachers exercised autonomy and used students\u0026rsquo; full linguistic repertoires. Conversely, less confident or inexperienced teachers often defaulted to superficial strategies, limiting students\u0026rsquo; creative expression. Our analysis offers a nuanced perspective: while creative pedagogies hold promise, their impact is contingent upon structural support and educators\u0026rsquo; ability to employ multimodal tools in culturally responsive and linguistically inclusive ways.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Gaps in the Literature\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eResearch on the use of multimodal approaches within multilingual English classrooms remains sparse, despite growing interest in this subject. Most academic studies on multimodal learning focus on homogeneous classrooms, such as those with a single language or mainstream students. However, little research exists on teaching strategies within education ecosystems where learners possess multiple languages.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNtelioglou et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e) are researchers who delved into urban elementary school practices of multimodal and multilingual literacy. The research project demonstrated how digital resources with linguistic assets present a potent educational combination; however, institutions often restrict teachers from exercising independent agency. Researchers at Hirsch and Macleroy (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) revealed how digital storytelling functions as a primary multimodal approach to enable multilingual students to integrate personal storytelling with multiple languages effectively. The current research primarily focuses on elementary classrooms and specific projects, which fail to provide conclusive findings that can be adapted to secondary educational settings and teacher implementation practices.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis indicates that research by Smith et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) and Hyun et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) evaluates how multilingual students benefit from creating videos and podcasts through multimodal practices. Many research investigations choose to collect insights from students who demonstrate their creative work, rather than examining how teachers implement teaching practices or their curricular limitations in classroom settings. Documented research about how teachers transform theory into practice through multimodal strategies remains scarce in classrooms with rigid learning frameworks and scarce resource availability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe independent analysis of translanguaging as an isolated concept represents a contradiction because both constructs ensure students can create meanings without limitations regarding modes or languages. Research on students' use of multimodal and translanguaging frameworks in practice remains sparse, as it does not address student transitions between linguistic and visual modes when creating digital narratives, nor teacher support of home languages through visual communication.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study addresses these gaps by examining how secondary English teachers in multilingual classrooms use and modify multimodal strategies in real-time instruction. It contributes to the literature by:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eOffering detailed classroom analysis that connects teacher intent, pedagogical choices, and student responses.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eInvestigating digital storytelling and collaborative tasks as vehicles for both language learning and identity expression.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eExploring the interplay between institutional barriers, teacher training, and the feasibility of implementing such strategies effectively.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study expands the empirical foundation for multimodal multilingual pedagogy and provides practical insights for educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers seeking to move beyond monolingual instructional norms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4 Implications for Practice\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe conclusions of this literature review produce important implications that affect educational practice and governmental policy regulation. For teachers to be successful using multimodal teaching, they need programs that improve their professional skills. It is essential that teacher training equips individuals with the skills to utilize technology, employ translanguaging strategies, and adopt culturally aware practices. Firms should make use of interactive whiteboards, multimedia software environments, and bilingual dictionaries for extended learning. Curriculum developers need to design educational resources that cater to the linguistic and cultural diversity found among students in schools. When such gaps are closed, educators can design effective learning spaces for all students with different home languages.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.5 Future Directions in Research\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFuture investigations should examine the long-term effects of multimodal educational methods on the educational achievement, mental development, and social adjustment of multilingual students. Research should investigate methods to integrate technology into multimodal educational strategies, aiming to maximize student learning in multilingual instructional settings. Studies must gather the voices and first-hand perspectives of multilingual learners to understand what works best for their educational journey. Investigators in these areas will inform education approaches that enable students to learn in more than one language.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3. METHODS","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.1 Research Design\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThrough qualitative research methods, the effectiveness of multimodal teaching strategies is evaluated in multilingual classrooms teaching English to students. A case study approach is an ideal method for analyzing educational phenomena when observing them in their original settings, according to Yin (2018). The study adopts an interpretive paradigm because it acknowledges the significance of social dynamics and cultural factors that influence academic learning (Creswell \u0026amp; Poth, 2018). Qualitative techniques are well-suited for this research investigation because they enable researchers to provide detailed insights into instructional approaches, teaching obstacles, and student focus. The research enhances its methodological strength through the triangulation methodology, which combines classroom observations with interviews, analysis of student work, and evaluation of classroom artifacts. The study primarily relies on qualitative research methods, yet it also conducts a small survey involving students to verify emerging patterns and supplement knowledge about student engagement levels.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.2 Sampling Method\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe research team employed purposive sampling as their method for selecting participants, targeting those who met predetermined criteria. The researchers worked with secondary schools in Guangdong, China, serving students from different linguistic backgrounds. Participating teachers brought different levels of experience in multimodal instruction, while ten students were participating in English classes through multimodal teaching methods. The additional questionnaire administered to thirty students supported the findings by providing quantitative data to verify the qualitative results. The researcher selected participants from diverse teaching backgrounds and students with different instructional settings to gain a thorough understanding of multilingual classroom multimodal practices. Guest et al. (2006) employed data saturation principles to demonstrate the appropriate sample size, as this ensured thematic convergence, thereby enhancing the credibility of the research results.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.3 Data Collection Methods\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eData were collected through multiple methods to ensure a holistic understanding of the research problem:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClassroom Observations\u003c/strong\u003e: The research team watched actual classroom sessions to document teachers\u0026apos; implementation of multimodal teaching methods. The research assessed how teachers interacted with students while exploring various visual and auditory instructional devices and monitoring educational advancement. The research team took comprehensive observation notes throughout every session.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSemi-Structured Interviews\u003c/strong\u003e: Semi-structured interviews enabled teachers to share their ongoing experiences, challenges, and personal observations regarding multimodal teaching. Participating teachers responded to open-ended interview questions, which enabled in-depth responses. Sample questions included:\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHow do multimodal teaching and learning affect student engagement and academic performance in multilingual classrooms?\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWhat are the best practices for integrating creative and inclusive methods in English education for multilingual contexts?\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHow can technology and multimedia resources enhance the effectiveness of multimodal teaching approaches in multilingual classrooms?\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWhat challenges do educators face in implementing multimodal approaches in multilingual English classrooms?\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWhat practical solutions can be proposed to support integrating multimodal strategies in multilingual English education?\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003c/ul\u003e\n \u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAnalysis of Student Work\u003c/strong\u003e: The analysis of student work, which included written documents, digital assignments, and multimedia projects, investigated how multimodal strategies influenced creativity, language skills, and student engagement.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClassroom Artifacts\u003c/strong\u003e: Additional classroom resources, including weekly lessons and instructional aids with digital education resources, were examined to understand multimodal teaching techniques in practice.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e.4 Data Analysis Techniques\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe researchers analyzed the data using thematic methods, maintaining their analysis in NVivo software to establish systematic coding systems. Multiple reviews of transcripts and observation notes allowed the researchers to perform open coding, identifying recurring themes. The researcher established major themes from which they grouped all coded data, including instructional effectiveness, technological barriers, and student engagement. The data analysis achieved 85% reliability when reviewed by an independent reviewer. The survey data processing, using descriptive statistics, generated numerical findings that supplemented the results obtained from the qualitative themes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.5 Ethical Considerations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe research study adhered to ethical guidelines, which included obtaining informed consent from all participants. All data was kept anonymous and confidential using encrypted data storage systems and pseudonym identification. All study participants could voluntarily join and withdraw at any point during research activities. The research received proper approval from an institutional review board for ethical purposes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.6 Limitations\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe research has yielded extensive findings; however, researchers need to address specific limitations within this work. The research contains data from 10 teaching professionals and 10 educational students for qualitative assessment, and it utilizes surveys from 30 additional students to present restricted quantitative evidence. The achieved data saturation could be strengthened by using a larger randomized sample to enhance the study\u0026apos;s generalizability. The analysis area of focus is Guangdong, which has a significant impact on the universal applicability of these findings beyond the province. The supplementary survey helps strengthen this research; however, the study would gain additional statistical power by implementing a comprehensive mixed-methods research design with experimental controls. Future research should conduct extended studies to examine the long-term effects of implementing multimodal teaching methods.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.7 Future Research Directions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGeneralizing the effectiveness of multimodal strategies requires additional research involving wider geographic areas and an evaluation of participant diversity in different educational systems. Extended research following students over time will help us understand how multifaceted instruction continues to influence their academic development, identity emergence, and cultural adjustment. Research applying experimental and mixed-methods approaches must verify how teaching with multiple modes affects student achievement measurements. Research into emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence and virtual spaces, is likely to lead to discoveries that facilitate the large-scale implementation of inclusive language education worldwide.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"4. RESULTS","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe findings from this research examine how teachers employ multimodal strategies within classrooms that include students who speak different languages. Study results demonstrate the effectiveness of multimodal strategies while documenting educational challenges that affect student engagement, revealing their influence on learning comprehension. The paper follows with a detailed examination that incorporates supporting scholarly research.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec23\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1 Effectiveness of Teaching Strategies\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe frequency and effectiveness of multimodal strategies are displayed in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e based on teachers' experience and proficiency levels.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrequency and Effectiveness of Multimodal Strategies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExperience\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKey Strategies Used\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffectiveness (1\u0026ndash;5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInstitutional Barriers\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTechnology Access\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProfessional Support\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u0026ndash;7 years\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDigital storytelling, group projects\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRigid curricula\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNeeds more training\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;1 year\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVisual aids, role-playing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLimited resources\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMedium\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRelies on peer collaboration\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u0026ndash;3 years\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDigital storytelling, visual aids\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNone\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRequires resource access\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTeachers achieved maximum success with multimodal approaches, which they used strategically, and by permitting students to incorporate their native languages into their learning activities. Digital storytelling, group projects, and interactive technology were teaching methods that experienced teachers frequently used to build student involvement and increase classroom engagement, as Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e demonstrates.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuring an educational session, an educator led students to develop bilingual video diary recordings of their family customs. During the presentation, Jia delivered her Mandarin narrative with her peer-made English subtitle translation. The student expressed to herself that speaking became simpler because understanding messages in two languages helped convey meaning more easily. The educational project enabled Jia to enhance her classroom discussions significantly.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe approach aligns with Garc\u0026iacute;a and Wei\u0026rsquo;s (2014) translanguaging pedagogy because it enables students to access their complete linguistic resources for creating meaning while demonstrating their identity and completing communicative activities. Under this approach, students gained validation for their language mixing, rather than facing the restriction of treating languages separately. The approach supported both a deeper understanding and emotional student engagement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e Research data showed that participants who used multimodal storytelling techniques throughout the project improved their oral skills and vocabulary selection, particularly when they previously avoided speaking activities. The study supports Vygotsky\u0026rsquo;s sociocultural theory because students learn through social tools and cultural support systems. The cultural artifacts comprising student videos, visuals, and peer engagement served as scaffolds during learning activities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudent engagement became a concern for this novice teacher because they asked, \"Will students remain devoted to their assignments?\" Ease of mind led me to present only fundamental visuals to the class. The teacher's reluctance diminished student achievement levels and interaction because the data in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e also highlighted this effect. The data demonstrate why teacher confidence, agency, and proper multimodal training are critical for creating effective outcomes with multimodal instruction approaches.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec24\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.2 Institutional Barriers and Technology Integration\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInstitutional Barriers and Technology Integration\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExperience\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInstitutional Barriers\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTech Use\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffective Tools Used\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSupport Needs\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u0026ndash;7 years\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRigid curriculum\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eN/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTraining programs, digital PD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;1 year\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLack of resources\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePadlet, Canva\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePeer collaboration\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u0026ndash;3 years\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNone\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOnline platforms\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCurriculum flexibility\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;1 year\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLack of resources\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eN/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFunding and tech access\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAll data collected from classroom elements and interviews demonstrated a persistent conflict between school standards and the promotion of creativity. Educational staff identified three critical obstacles: inflexible teaching guidelines, limited device availability, and weak administrative backing. One teacher noted:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eI frequently needed to bring my laptop and speakers to make a lesson effective. The school has one projector for four classrooms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite these constraints, educators with access to external funding or participating in professional development programs were more likely to integrate digital platforms effectively. For instance, a teacher who regularly used Padlet and Canva reported higher student interaction:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\"When I allow students to create posters for their narratives with online tools, they become more engaged. They often request to keep working even after class.\"\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec25\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.3 Linguistic Diversity and Multimodal Bridging\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe analysis in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e illustrates the impact of linguistic diversity on multimodal bridging effectiveness.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLinguistic Diversity and Multimodal Bridging\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExperience\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePerceived Impact of Diversity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUse of Multimodal Bridging\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOutcomes Observed\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u0026ndash;7 years\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVaries widely\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnhanced comprehension, identity work\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;1 year\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCreates challenges\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNot sure\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMinimal adaptation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u0026ndash;3 years\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eImproves understanding\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNot sure\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSome success, inconsistent strategy\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u0026ndash;3 years\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVaries widely\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMissed opportunities\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;1 year\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCreates challenges\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModest gains, potential for growth\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eClassroom data showed that teachers frequently struggled with addressing the diverse linguistic backgrounds of their students. Those who acknowledged and incorporated students' home languages into lessons\u0026mdash;via subtitled videos, bilingual glossaries, or peer translation\u0026mdash;reported more effective outcomes. One student explained:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\"I felt a sense of joy when I could write part of the script in my language. It allowed me to grasp better what I wanted to express in English.\"\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e On the other hand, teachers who hesitated to use translanguaging practices tended to observe limited participation from non-native speakers. This highlights the importance of multimodal bridging in connecting students' prior knowledge with English instruction.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec26\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.4 Student Perceptions of Multimodal Learning\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA summary of student perspectives on multimodal teaching methods and their impact on learning experiences is presented in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudent Perceptions of Multimodal Learning\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudent Language Level\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFirst Language\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrategy Impact\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSupport Needs\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBeginner\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eImproves understanding\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePeer support, visual aids\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntermediate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnglish\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMixed experience\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMore digital support\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNative-level\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnglish\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMinimal impact\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChallenge not addressed\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdvanced\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnglish\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrong improvement\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTech engagement, creativity outlets\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudent feedback revealed a spectrum of responses. Advanced learners found multimodal assignments empowering, while beginners expressed excitement and frustration. A student noted:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\"I enjoyed creating the video, but the editing was challenging. I needed assistance with the English section.\"\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePeer collaboration helped mitigate these challenges. Less proficient learners benefited from linguistic support in classrooms where students were encouraged to work in pairs or groups. Observations revealed that these students contributed actively through drawings, gestures, and translations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec27\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.5 Professional Development and Support Needs\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e highlights professional development and institutional support needs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab5\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 5\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProfessional Development and Support Needs\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExperience\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSupport Resources\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDevelopment Needs\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u0026ndash;7 years\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOngoing training\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWorkshops on digital tools\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;1 year\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePeer support, Funding\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMentorship, curriculum alignment\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u0026ndash;3 years\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCurriculum flexibility\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDigital integration and planning\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;years\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTraining and collaboration\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdvanced multimodal techniques PD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTeachers repeatedly emphasized the need for more consistent training and institutional backing. One teacher stated:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\"We were supposed to use these new methods, but no one taught us how. I figured it out through trial and error.\"\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eProfessional development sessions focused on digital media, multilingual learning, and classroom management were reported as especially helpful. Informal networks among colleagues also proved valuable, with one teacher describing their support group as \"a lifeline.\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec28\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.6 Assessment Results\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e presents the assessment results based on pre-test and post-test evaluations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab6\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 6\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eResults of the Study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAssessment Type\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean Score\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKey Insight\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-Test\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e70\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBaseline language proficiency\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePost-Test\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e85\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotable gains linked to strategy use\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe pre-test and post-test results (averaging from 70 to 85) show significant improvement. However, this improvement was not uniform across all students or classrooms\u0026mdash;it was closely tied to the depth of multimodal strategy integration. These findings support Kress\u0026rsquo;s (2010) assertion that learning across multiple modes facilitates deeper engagement and a more comprehensive representation of knowledge. In Vygotskian terms, the combination of peer interaction, culturally relevant topics, and multimodal tools served as scaffolding for student development.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudents in a particular classroom demonstrated improved vocabulary skills and enhanced grammatical accuracy in spoken English, while their performance in storyboarding and peer video assessment remained steady throughout instruction. Student work examples revealed improved creativity and enhanced sentence complexity in their content production.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA bilingual student reflected in an interview:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eI used to write only short answers. However, with the video project, I needed to describe scenes. I improved my ability to explain feelings and actions in English.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis suggests that the multimodal task encouraged language expansion\u0026mdash;students had to plan, narrate, and visually express their ideas, engaging more deeply with the language.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec29\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.6.1 The Comparison Results\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudent performance data indicate substantial growth when teachers use multimodal approaches. Student scores from the post-test assessment show significant improvement, demonstrating the effectiveness of these techniques with multilingual students.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe pre- and post-test data demonstrate the effective outcomes that multimodal methodologies produce when applied properly. Students under teachers who used visual, speaking, and writing methods with translation improved their vocabulary development, speaking abilities, and sentence complexity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen participating in a multilingual digital storytelling project, participants improved their scores from the 60s to the mid-80s. Students utilized video recordings that covered various topics, with text subtitles alternating between English and their native language to clarify the more complex sections. To put it in the words of one teacher: \"What we aimed for was teaching the skills to think and share their ideas comfortably, whether they spoke Italian or not.\" The findings demonstrate that assessment gains are significant factors that reflect students\u0026rsquo; self-esteem and ability to control their communication.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"5. DISCUSSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe research results support Vygotsky's sociocultural theory, demonstrating that interpersonal collaboration and relevant cultural teaching materials facilitate student learning. Professional collaboration through multiple modes enabled students to become active knowledge creators, rather than merely absorbing language lessons.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study demonstrated that teacher agency is vital for facilitating successful translanguaging practices, aligning with Cummins' (2000) perspective on how educational policies should enable teachers to utilize students' home languages in relevant real-world contexts effectively. Data shows that students become most successful when they have opportunities to use their entire language, incorporating their cultural background, and shape their learning through personal expressions in diverse modes of communication. Learners became more engaged through digital storytelling projects, bilingual poster production, and dramatized role-play, as these methods leveraged their pre-existing linguistic abilities. Through these activities, students developed the ability to direct their storytelling by combining the languages they know with English as a means of understanding and communication.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOne teacher emphasized the significance of these tasks:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\"Allowing students to share their stories through pictures and their authentic voices made a significant impact. They felt acknowledged, and their confidence in English developed naturally.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e Research observations indicated that students who formerly avoided speaking in English started actively participating by giving answers and supervising group activities after the instructional materials shifted from text-based to a combination of visual and aural elements.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLearning strategies that follow translanguaging principles allow students to use all their available linguistic tools for deeper comprehension in their studies. Garc\u0026iacute;a and Wei (2014) explain that translanguaging extends beyond language mixing, as it aims to provide students with personalized approaches to creating meaning. The observed classrooms utilized multimodal strategies, which enabled this achievement. A teacher enabled students to create short films with English dialogue, including native subtitles. Through this support structure, students developed vocabulary skills and gained a better conceptual understanding by investing prolonged time in refining their ideas.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDue to flexible instruction practices, students developed an environment that minimized their concerns and allowed them to engage with authentic content and activities freely. Multimodality has brought success to students in multilingual classrooms by offering an alternative approach to language learning, thereby reducing apprehension about grammatical errors and accent judgments. Grade schoolers developed a progressive confidence in their communication, while minimizing linguistic formality. This technique yielded improved language results over time.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese gains were measurable. Students who devoted extensive time to multimodal activities scored better on their grammar skills, expanded their vocabulary, and demonstrated improved fluency in speech in post-tests. The classroom environment improved when teachers consistently employed multiple teaching methods, resulting in improved student behavior, enhanced peer teamwork, and standardized participation across different skill levels.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis achievement occurred exclusively in certain instances throughout the study area. Non-multimodal training among educators led to resistance, resulting in some teachers instructing their students to use only static images or basic activities. As one less experienced teacher shared:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\"I used images but was unsure how to make them interactive. The students enjoyed them, but I did not notice significant improvement in their language skills.\"\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe comparison shows that multimodal approaches require deliberate planning, as they necessitate teachers with strong proficiency and skill in their application. With proper usage, multimodal strategies serve as effective instruments to develop the potential of multilingual students. However, these instructional methods become ineffective when applied shallowly or incorrectly during learning activities.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"6. CONCLUSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study makes an important contribution to the current literature by focusing on the role of teachers in operationalizing translanguaging through multimodal strategies. Unlike previous research focusing on student outcomes or ideal classroom scenarios, this study grounds its findings in real-world secondary schools with limited resources and structural constraints. It highlights the specific ways educators adapt practices like bilingual video narration, collaborative storyboarding, and peer translation to meet the needs of multilingual learners. Doing so bridges the gap between theory and application, offering practical and policy-relevant insights into inclusive English instruction. Narrowed research findings indicate that multi-input learning methods lead to significant growth in student participation, as well as enhanced academic results and creative abilities, within multilingual English learning environments. Integrating digital storytelling with collaborative projects and interactive media by teachers creates adaptable learning environments that cater to students from diverse linguistic backgrounds. Teachers with higher expertise and extended experience handling multimodal methods deliver better classroom outcomes. Although these approaches show promise, they remain limited by institutional barriers, including rigid educational frameworks, limited resource availability, and a lack of professional development opportunities. These obstacles can be addressed through structural policy improvements, increased funding for technology, and well-organized training for educational professionals.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese promising results are, however, limited by several factors in this research. Such research was conducted exclusively within a defined geographic space and institutional network, limiting its ability to demonstrate universal applicability across all multilingual educational settings. Qualitative classroom observation methods, student interview data, and academic work analysis provided unique insights into pedagogical practices. However, they lacked the quantitative evidence required to measure lasting student achievement. Multimodal teaching strategies need further validation through expanded research involving larger subject pools and long-term data analysis, accompanied by qualitative experimental methods that can assess their effectiveness across various educational locations. An assessment becomes possible when researchers investigate how multimodal teaching techniques scale up across different educational levels, combined with cultural environments, alongside studying the sustained language learning and cognitive evolution results. The possibilities of emerging technologies, including AI-driven language tools and virtual learning environments, offer opportunities to enhance the delivery and effectiveness of multimodal, multilingual education. Future research on these key areas will generate innovative teaching strategies for preparing global students in multilingual communication through inclusive learning practices.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eArend B, Sunnen P (2018) Multilingualism in Action: A Conversation Analytic View on How Children are Re-Voicing a Story in a French. Second Lang Learn Lesson 3(2). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.22492/ijll.3.2.01\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.22492/ijll.3.2.01\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBarac R, Bialystok E, Castro D, S\u0026aacute;nchez M (2014) The Cognitive Development of Young Dual Language Learners: A Critical Review. Early Child Res Q 29(4):699\u0026ndash;714. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.02.003\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.02.003\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBermingham N (2021) Countering Recapitalization: Examining Teachers' Discourses of Migration in Galicia. Lang Cult Curriculum 34(3):337\u0026ndash;351. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1874965\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/07908318.2021.1874965\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCoccetta F (2018) Developing university students\u0026rsquo; multimodal communicative competence: field research into multimodal text studies in English. System 77:19\u0026ndash;27. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.01.004\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.system.2018.01.004\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGilmour R (2017) Reading/writing multilingualism: language, literature, and creativity in the multilingual classroom. Engl Educ 51(3):296\u0026ndash;307. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2017.11964030\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/04250494.2017.11964030\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHiippala T, Bateman J (2020) Introducing the diagrammatic semiotic mode. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2001.11224\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.48550/arxiv.2001.11224\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHirsch S, Macleroy V (2019) The art of belonging: Exploring the effects on the English classroom when poetry meets multilingual digital storytelling. Engl Educ 54(1):41\u0026ndash;57. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2019.1690394\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/04250494.2019.1690394\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHyun J, Heidt E, Prasad G (2022) Designing Critical Multilingual Multiliteracies Projects in Two-Way Immersion Classrooms: Affordances and Impacts on Students. Can J Appl Linguistics 25(3):1\u0026ndash;32. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2022.32599\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.37213/cjal.2022.32599\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIbrahim N (2022) Visual and Artifactual Approaches in Engaging Multilingual Teachers: Creating Documents in Pre-Service Teacher Education. Languages 7(2):152. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020152\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/languages7020152\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJang J (2024) Emerging multilingual children\u0026rsquo;s school language socialization: a three-year longitudinal case study of a Korean middle school. Languages 9(3):104. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/languages9030104\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/languages9030104\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKapoyannis T (2019) Literacy Engagement in Multilingual and Multicultural Learning Spaces. Tesl Can J 36(2):1\u0026ndash;25. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v36i2.1298\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.18806/tesl.v36i2.1298\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKwon S (2022) Translanguaging in multilingual English classrooms. Int J Lit Cult Lang Educ 3:76\u0026ndash;80. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.14434/ijlcle.v3i.35385\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.14434/ijlcle.v3i.35385\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLangeloo A, Lara M, Deunk M, Klitzing N, Strijbos J (2019) A systematic review of teacher-child interactions with multilingual young children. Rev Educ Res 89(4):536\u0026ndash;568. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319855619\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3102/0034654319855619\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLangeloo A, Lara M, Deunk M, LoCasale-Crouch J, Strijbos J (2020) Profiles of learning opportunities for multilingual and monolingual children in kindergarten. Eur J Psychol Educ 36(2):379\u0026ndash;404. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00487-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10212-020-00487-0\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi M (2020) Multimodal pedagogy in TESOL teacher education: Students\u0026rsquo; perspectives. System 94:102337\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNtelioglou BY, Fannin J, Montanera M, Cummins J (2014) A multilingual and multimodal approach to literacy teaching and learning in urban education: A collaborative inquiry project in an inner city elementary school. Front Psychol 5:533\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNouri J (2018) Students' multimodal literacy and design of learning during self-studies in higher education. Technol Knowl Learn 24(4):683\u0026ndash;698. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9360-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10758-018-9360-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOsuna E, Sudholt D (2018) Empirical analysis of diversity-preserving mechanisms on example landscapes for multimodal optimization. 207\u0026ndash;219. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99259-4_17\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-3-319-99259-4_17\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eO\u0026rsquo;Halloran K, Tan S, E M (2015) Multimodal analysis for critical thinking. Learn Media Technol 42(2):147\u0026ndash;170. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1101003\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/17439884.2016.1101003\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePutrawan G, Sinaga T, Poh S, Dekhnich O (2022) Beliefs about multilingualism concerning translanguaging: a survey among pre-service EFL teachers in Indonesia. Integr Educ 26(4):756\u0026ndash;770. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.109.026.202204.756-770\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.15507/1991-9468.109.026.202204.756-770\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRahmadhani A (2018) A genre-based approach to teaching multimodal text. Curricula 3(2). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.22216/jcc.2018.v3i2.3571\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.22216/jcc.2018.v3i2.3571\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eReyes-Torres A, Raga MP (2020) A multimodal approach fosters multiliteracy pedagogy in teaching EFL through picture books. Atlantis 42(1):94\u0026ndash;119\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSalamanti E, Park D, Ali N, Brown S (2023) The Efficacy of Collaborative and Multimodal Learning Strategies in Enhancing English Language Proficiency Among ESL/EFL Learners: A Quantitative Analysis. 1(2):78\u0026ndash;89Research Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSlaughter Y, Cross R (2020) Understanding plurilingual pedagogies in English as an additional language (EAL) classrooms challenges the monolingual mindset. Lang Teach Res 25(1):39\u0026ndash;60. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820938819\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1362168820938819\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSmith BE, Amgott N, Malova I (2022) It made me think differently: Bilingual students\u0026rsquo; perspectives on multimodal composing in the English language arts classroom. Tesol Q 56(2):525\u0026ndash;551\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSon M (2024) Conbat+: Possibilities and challenges in preparing student teachers in English for plurilingual education. Nordic J Lang Teach Learn 11(3). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003eLII-LVIII. https://doi.org/10.46364/njltl.v11i2.1167\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"LII-LVIII. 10.46364/njltl.v11i2.1167\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSong J, Howard D, Olazabal-Arias W (2022) Translanguaging as a strategy for supporting multilingual learners\u0026rsquo; social-emotional learning. Educ Sci 12(7):475. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070475\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/educsci12070475\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThapa D (2023) A review on teachers and students' engagement in mathematics learning: a critical reflection on the Nepalese context. Dhaulagiri J Contemp Iss 1(1):34\u0026ndash;39. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3126/djci.v1i1.58624\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3126/djci.v1i1.58624\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWagner C, Parra M, Proctor C (2019) Teacher agency in a multi-year professional development collaborative. Engl Teach Pract Critique 18(4):399\u0026ndash;414. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-11-2018-0099\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1108/etpc-11-2018-0099\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"multimodal approaches, English education, multilingual classrooms, digital media, inclusive pedagogy, creative practices, student engagement, translanguaging, policy reform","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6766863/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6766863/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThe research investigates the adaptation process of multimodal strategies used by secondary English teachers at multilingual classrooms to develop student engagement, language proficiency, and identity development. The study examines the integration of student home languages in English teaching through digital storytelling, collaborative tasks, and bilingual media projects, utilizing multimodal learning principles and translanguaging teaching methods. The research team investigated instructional effectiveness using qualitative case study methods in Guangdong, China, which relied on classroom observations, interviews with teachers, student work examples, and the collection of artifacts. The study demonstrated that students made significant progress in their oral skills and vocabulary development, and boosted their language confidence while completing multimodal assignments that incorporated all their linguistic skills. The study results show that institutions featuring rigid curricular instructions and restricted access to technology warrant teachers to exercise professional autonomy through development programs. The paper offers practical insights into classroom multimodal translanguaging approaches in real-world environments, while advocating for institutional improvements in inclusive English education structures.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Empowering Multilingual Learners: Real-World Adaptation of Multimodal Strategies in English Education","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-05-29 12:39:46","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6766863/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"b603335b-746d-4e2d-9c8b-a24e85182d0e","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 29th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-05-29T12:39:46+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-05-29 12:39:46","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6766863","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6766863","identity":"rs-6766863","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}