An investigational ovarian stimulation protocol increased significantly the psychological burden in women with premature ovarian failure
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This study found that an investigational ovarian stimulation protocol in women with premature ovarian failure significantly increased anxiety and depression scores compared to baseline.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychological impact (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) of an investigational ovarian stimulation protocol in women with premature ovarian failure (POF). DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study. POPULATION: Ten women with POF. METHODS: Women with idiopathic POF were placed on three consecutive treatment cycles consisting of gonadotropin ovarian stimulation after estrogen priming, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pituitary desensitization, and corticosteroid immune suppression. RESULTS: Median anxiety and depression scores increased significantly from baseline following three consecutive treatment cycles from 4.0 (range 2.0-8.0) to 11.0 (range 10.0-14.0) (p-value 0.041) and from 1.5 (range 0-6.0) to 9.0 (range 7.0-10.0) (p-value 0.039), respectively. There were nine "probable" anxiety (90%) and three "probable" depression (30%) cases on the final treatment cycle compared with none (0%) on baseline (p-value 0.004 and 0.250, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The use of investigational ovarian stimulation protocols in women with idiopathic POF was associated with excessive psychological strain. Women with POF should be cautioned against the potentially harmful aspect of similar treatments of unproven benefit.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (28)
- High-dose, short-term glucocorticoids for the treatment of infertility resulting from premature ovarian failure via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55854-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01991.x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006250-198603001-00018 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/12.12.2623 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.086 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.029 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(88)90791-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54775-x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53513-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/14.7.1777 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humupd/dml040 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humupd/5.5.483 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/dei015 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0753-0_3 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53514-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1037/0021-843x.100.3.316 via openalex
- W2417285425 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57485-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60785-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00411-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45687-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/jc.81.10.3615 via openalex
- doi:10.1037//0021-843x.100.3.316 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0022-3999(94)90118-x via openalex
- doi:10.1210/jcem.81.10.8855811 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0022-3999(61)90004-6 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:37:04.871248+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK