The therapeutic effect of percutaneous microwave ablation in treatment of focal uterine adenomyosis
Percutaneous microwave ablation effectively treated focal uterine adenomyosis, with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and DCE-MRI showing over 90% ablation rates and high consistency between modalities.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper studied percutaneous microwave ablation for 42 patients with single focal uterine adenomyosis, using contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) performed before and 1–2 days after treatment to evaluate ablation effects. After ablation, both imaging methods showed no enhancement in the ablated zones, with mean ablation volumes around 49 cm3 and mean ablation rates of about 92% or higher; the authors report similar concordance between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and DCE-MRI for ablation rate assessment. The major limitation explicitly implied by the design is the short post-procedure imaging window (imaging only 1–2 days after ablation), without longer-term outcomes described. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — it assesses how contrast-enhanced ultrasound measures treatment ablation rate for focal uterine adenomyosis after percutaneous microwave ablation, with DCE-MRI comparison.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
5,959 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Objective
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00