Selection, optimization, and validation of ten chronic disease polygenic risk scores for clinical implementation in diverse populations

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-05 ⓘ

This study developed a clinical implementation pipeline for ten polygenic risk scores, including breast cancer and asthma, validated in diverse populations to support genome-informed risk assessment within the eMERGE Network.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have improved in predictive performance supporting their use in clinical practice. Reduced predictive performance of PRS in diverse populations can exacerbate existing health disparities. The NHGRI-funded eMERGE Network is returning a PRS-based genome-informed risk assessment to 25,000 diverse adults and children. We assessed PRS performance, medical actionability, and potential clinical utility for 23 conditions. Standardized metrics were considered in the selection process with additional consideration given to strength of evidence in African and Hispanic populations. Ten conditions were selected with a range of high-risk thresholds: atrial fibrillation, breast cancer, chronic kidney disease, coronary heart disease, hypercholesterolemia, prostate cancer, asthma, type 1 diabetes, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. We developed a pipeline for clinical PRS implementation, used genetic ancestry to calibrate PRS mean and variance, created a framework for regulatory compliance, and developed a PRS clinical report. eMERGE’s experience informs the infrastructure needed to implement PRS-based implementation in diverse clinical settings.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00